8,401
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The methodology of a multi-model project examining how facebook infrastructures social relations

&
Pages 1356-1372 | Received 17 Mar 2015, Accepted 28 Aug 2015, Published online: 20 Oct 2015

References

  • Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. London: Routledge.
  • Back, L., & Puwar, N. (Eds.) (2013). Live methods. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Baym, N. K. (2007). The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday, 12(8). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1978/1853
  • boyd, d. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Eds.), Youth identity and digital media (119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bucher, T. (2012). A technicity of attention: How software ‘makes sense’. Culture Machine, 13, 1–13.
  • Bucher, T. (2013). Objects of intense feeling: The case of the twitter API. Computational Culture, 3. Retrieved from http://computationalculture.net/article/objects-of-intense-feeling-the-case-of-the-twitter-api
  • Burrows, R. (2012).  Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review 60(2): 355–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077.x
  • Burrows, R., & Savage, M. (2014) After the crisis? Big data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology. Big Data and Society, 1, 1–6. doi: 10.1177/2053951714540280
  • Crogan, P., & Kinsley, S. (2012). Paying attention: Towards a critique of the attention economy. Culture Machine, 13, 1–29.
  • DeLyser, D., & Sui, D. (2013). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative divide II: Inventive approaches to big data, mobile methods, and rhythmanalysis. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 293–305. doi: 10.1177/0309132512444063
  • Galloway, A. (2012). The interface effect. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Gibbs, S. (2015). Facebook tracks all visitors, breaching EU law. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/mar/31/facebook-tracks-all-visitors-breaching-eu-law-report
  • Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of platforms. New Media and Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738
  • Hands, J. (2013). Introduction: Politics, power and ‘platformativity’. Culture Machine, 13, 1–9.
  • Hayles, K. N. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Hochman, N., & Manovich, L. (2013, June). Zooming into an instagram city: Reading the local through social media. First Monday. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4711/3698
  • Hogan, B. (2008). Analyzing social networks via the internet. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The handbook of online research methods  (pp. 141–161).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ito, M. (2007). Introduction. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 1–14). London: The MIT Press.
  • Jameson, F. (1981). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://dmlcentral.net/resources/3756
  • Karpf, D. (2012). Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 639–661. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468
  • Kember, S., & Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after new media: Mediation as a vital process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kittler, F. (1999).  Gramophone, Film, Typewriter.  Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langlois, G., & Elmer, G. (2013). The research politics of social media platforms. Culture Machine, 14, 1–17.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmnanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London: Continuum.
  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2012). The next decade in internet time. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 616–638. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.675691
  • Lievrouw, L. A., & Nguyen, L. U. (2007). Linking and the network imaginary. In New Network Theory Conference. Amsterdam Polytechnic, Hogeschool van Amsterdam: Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis, the Institute of Network Cultures.
  • Light, B., & Cassidy, E. (2014). Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: Rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1169–1184.
  • Mackenzie, A. (2002). Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. London: Continuum.
  • Mackenzie, A. (2006). Cutting code: Software and sociality. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 769–787. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
  • Mair, M., Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. W. (2015). Statistical practice: Putting society on display. Theory, Culture & Society, 1–27. doi:10.1177/0263276414559058
  • Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social? Issues in real-time social research. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
  • Mierzwinski, E., & Chester, J. (2013). Selling consumers, not lists: The new world of digital decision-making and the role of the fair credit reporting act. Suffolk University Law Review, XLVI(3). Retrieved from http://suffolklawreview.org/selling-consumers-not-lists/
  • Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(4), 387–400.
  • Miyazaki, S. (2012). Algorhythmics: Understanding micro-temporality in computational cultures. Computational Cultures, 3. Retrieved from http://computationalculture.net/article/algorhythmics-understanding-micro-temporality-in-computational-cultures
  • Morozov, E. (2014). How much for your data? What you whistle in the shower. LeMonde Diplomatique. Kent, LeMonde 1408: 1, 10–11.
  • Munster, A. (2013). An aesthesia of networks: Conjunctive experience in art and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Murphie, A. (2007). The fallen present: Time in the mix. In R. Hassan & R. E. Purser (Eds.), 24/7: Time and temporality in the network society  (pp. 122–141). Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
  • Napoli, P. (2003).  Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Neyland, D. (2014). On organizing algorithms. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276414530477
  • Nixon, B. (2014). Toward a political economy of ‘audience labour’ in the digital era. tripleC, 12(2), 713–734.
  • Peters, J. D. (2013). Calendar, clock, tower. In J. Stolow (Ed.), Tower in Deus in Machina: Religion, technology and the things in between (pp. 25–42). New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Poon, M. (2013). Response to tarleton Gillespie's ‘the relevance of algorithms’. In Governing Algorithms Conference. New York University, US. Retrieved from http://governingalgorithms.org/
  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2014). What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814546481
  • Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. doi: 10.1177/0038038507080443
  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.
  • Skeggs, B. (2009). The moral economy of person production: The class relations of self-performance on ‘reality’ television. Sociological Review, 57(4), 626–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01865.x
  • Skeggs, B. (2014a). Values beyond value? Is anything beyond the logic of capital? (The 2013 BJS annual lecture). The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12072
  • Skeggs, B. (2014b). A global sociology of values and value: How to move beyond the analytic of capital. International Sociology Association, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012). Reacting to reality television: Performance, audience, value. London: Routledge.
  • Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London: Pluto.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In ICWSM ‘14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 505–514.
  • Turkle, S. (2011). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2012). Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity. Television and New Media, 13, 160–176. doi: 10.1177/1527476411415291
  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). London: Routledge.
  • Weltevrede, E., Helmond, A., & Gerlitz, C. (2014). The politics of real-time: A device perspective on social media platforms and search engines. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(6), 125–150. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537318
  • Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 51–76. doi: 10.1177/02632760122052048