Synchronicity matters: defining the characteristics of digital generations

References

• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people and new media (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, L., & Smith, L. (2003). The digital divide: an urban miss? In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact, integrate, impact: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 95–103). Adelaide, 7–10 December 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., & Corrocher, N. (2011). The intensity of VoIp usage in Great Britain: Users’ characteristics and firms’ strategies. Telecommunications Policy, 35(6), 522–531. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantiou, I. D., & Kautz, K. (2008). Economic factors and diffusion of IP telephony: Empirical evidence from an advanced market. Telecommunications Policy, 32(3–4), 197–211. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2007.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Coleman, J., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), (2014). Digital technologies in the lives of young people. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dingli, A., & Seychell, D. (2015). The new digital natives: Cutting the chord. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dolničar, V., Hrast, M. F., Vehovar, V., & Petrovčič, A. (2013). Digital inequality and intergenerational solidarity: The role of social support in proxy internet use. Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR). Retrieved from http://spir.aoir.org/index.php/spir/article/viewFile/734/324
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (1998). La comunicazione tecnologica: Comportamenti, opinioni ed emozioni degli Europei [Technological communication behaviour, opinions and emotions in Europe] (pp. 125–194). In L. Fortunati (Ed.), Telecomunicando in Europa [Telecommunication in Europe]. Milan: Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (in press). Digital generations, but not as we know them.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 8, 288–309.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Communications Research, 37(3), 352–374. doi: 10.1177/0093650209356439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. doi: 10.1080/01411920902989227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 202–228). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information, Technology & People, 18(2), 142–171. doi: 10.1108/09593840510601513
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (2008). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 71–92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & Society, 1, 149–172.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S. S. K. (2013). ICT's impact on family solidarity and upward mobility in translocal China. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(3), 322–340. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2012.739186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2008). The impacts of young people's internet use on class boundaries and life trajectories. Sociology, 42(1), 137–153. doi: 10.1177/0038038507084829
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, K. C. (2007). Generation digital: Politics, commerce, and childhood in the age of the internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N. (2010). Adoption and use of computer-based voice over internet protocol phone service: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 40–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's sociology of generations. British Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 481–495. doi: 10.2307/591659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 2. On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424843
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2009). H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate, 5. Retrieved April 4, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=705
   Google Scholar
• Smoreda, Z., & Licoppe, C. (2000). Gender-specific use of the domestic telephone. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 238–252. doi: 10.2307/2695871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2012). Tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö 2012 [Use of information and communications technology in 2012]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2013). Use of information and communications technology by individuals in 2013. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2013/sutivi_2013_2013-11-07_tau_011_fi.html
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2014). Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö 2014 [Use of information and communications technology in 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2014/sutivi_2014_2014-11-06_fi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, S. (2014). The affordances of reading/writing on paper and digitally in Finland. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 532–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• University of Michigan. (2006). On the move: The role of cellular communications in American life. Pohs report on mobile communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N., & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. (2008). Families without borders: Mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635–652. doi: 10.1177/0038038508091620
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Li, Y., Tan, C.-H., & Teo, H.-H. (2007). Students’ participation intention in an online discussion forum: why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? Information & Management, 44(5), 456–466. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar