Neogeography and the democratization of GIS: a metasynthesis of qualitative research

References

• Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). Nothing includes everything: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 193–214. doi:10.1177/0309132509343728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/690/
   Google Scholar
• Batty, K., Hudson-Smith, A., Milton, R. & Crooks, A. (2010). Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS, 16, 1–13. doi:10.1080/19475681003700831
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T., Donert, K., Gossette, F., Kienberger, S. Marani, M., Qureshi, S. & Tiede, D. (2012). Virtual globes: Serving science and society. Information, 3, 372–390. doi:10.3390/info3030372
   Google Scholar
• Bondas, T. & Hall, O. C. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 113–121. doi:10.1177/1049732306295879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7, 209–215. doi:10.1258/135581902320432732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budhathoki, N., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72, 149–160. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9189-x
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. (2006). Virtual Globes: The web-wide world. Nature, 439, 776–778. doi:10.1038/439776a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinnamon, J., & Schuurman, N. (2013). Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information. Geojournal, 78, 657–674. doi:10.1007/s10708-012-9458-6
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y. & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4, 332–358. doi:10.2902/1725-0463.2009.04.art16
   Google Scholar
• Connell, A. F., & Nord, W. R. (1996). The bloodless coup: The infiltration of organizaton science by uncertainty and values. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 32, 407–427. doi:10.1177/0021886396324005
   Google Scholar
• Connors, J. P., Lei, S., & Kelly, M. (2012). Citizen Science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 1267–1289. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.627058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. (2005a). Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: Observations from two communities in Indonesia. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Information Technologies and International Development, 2, 25–44. Retrieved from http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewFile/197/67 doi: 10.1162/1544752044193425
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. M. & Keller, C. P. (2005b). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica, 40, 91–102. doi:10.3138/J590-6354-P38V-4269
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. (2003). The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS, 7, 165–175. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00138
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, J. E. & Fisher, P. F. (2003). Geoslavery. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 22, 47–52. Retrieved from https://msu.edu/~kg/874/geoslavery.pdf doi: 10.1109/MTAS.2003.1188276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M. & Kitchin, R. (2013). Crowdsourced cartography: Mapping experience and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 45, 19–36. doi:10.1068/a44484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58, 197–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 349–357. doi:10.1177/0309132509340711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F. & Sui, D. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 571–590. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2004). The Alexandria digital library project. D-Lib Magazine, 10. doi:10.1045/may2004-goodchild
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2009). Neogeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Services, 3, 82–96. doi:10.1080/17489720902950374
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. (2009). Neogeography and the palimpsests of place: Web 2.0 and the construction of a virtual earth. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101, 422–436. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45, 55–69. doi:10.1068/a45184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, 2, 2011–2039. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. T., & Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the appropriate methodology: Understanding research philosophy. Waterford: Waterford Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.wit.ie/1466/1/Choosing_the_Appropriate_Methodology_Understanding_Research_Philosoph(RIKON_Group).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, L., Khosla, R., & Canepa, C. (2005). Leaves, pebbles, and chalk: Building a Public Participation GIS in New Delhi, India. Journal of Urban Technology, 12, 1–19. doi:10.1080/10630730500116479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A., & Milton, R. (2008). Mapping for the masses: Accessing Web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6). Retrieved from http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/15198/1/15198.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jasco, P. (2004). Citation searching. Online Information Review, 28, 454–460. doi:10.1108/14684520410570580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553–560. Retrieved from http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/6/4/553.short doi:10.1177/104973239600600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. (2003). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 645–661. Retrieved from http://meipokwan.org/Paper/Annals_2002.pdf doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. (2011). Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & C. Perkins (Eds.), The map reader: Theories of mapping practice and cartographic representation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470979587.ch58
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 220–230. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2014). On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 60–79. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.846159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLafferty, S. (2002). Mapping women's worlds: Knowledge power and the bounds of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 269–69. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003879
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz, F. (2013). Power, empowerment and participatory development: Conceptual linkages. Open Journal of Social Science Research, 1, 26–30. doi:10.12966/ojssr.05.03.2013
   Google Scholar
• Noy, C. (2008). Sampling Knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327–344. doi:10.1080/13645570701401305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painho, M., Peixoto, M., Cabral, P., & Sena, R. (2001). WebGIS as a teaching tool. Proceedings of the ESRI UC, New University of Lisbon, Portugal, Institute for Statistics and Information Management. Retrieved from http://labnt.isegi.unl.pt/links_CV/WebGIS_as_a_teaching_tool.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58, 470–484. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. L., Dubouloz, C. J., Chevrier, J., Ashe, B., King, J. & Moldoveanu, M. (2009). Conducting qualitative metasynthesis research: Insights from a metasynthesis project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 22–33. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/5100
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, K., Baud, I., Denis, E., Scott, D. & Sydenstricker-neto, J. (2013). Participatory spatial knowledge management tools: Empowerment and upscaling or exclusion? Information, Communication & Society, 16, 258–285. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.687393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, A. J. (2007). Research methods in information. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, S. & Joliveau, T. (2009). Neogeography? An extension of mainstream geography for everyone made by everyone? Journal of Location Based Services 3, 75–81. doi:10.1080/17489720903146824
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Focus on Qualitative Methods, Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365–371. Retrieved from https://www.google.ie/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Qualitative+metasynthesis:+issues+and+techniques doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scassa, T. (2013). Legal issues with volunteered geographic information. The Canadian Geographer, 57, 1–10. doi:10.11111/j.1541-0064.2012.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. (2004). GIS: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. (2013). Gender and the Geoweb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, 78, 981–996. doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9492-z
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D., & Goodchild, M. (2003). A tetradic analysis of GIS and society using McLuhan's law of the media. Canadian Geographers, 47, 5–17. Retrieved from http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~good/papers/385.pdf doi: 10.1111/1541-0064.02e08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, D. Z. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. Geojournal, 72, 161–171. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. J. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://brainoff.com/iac2009/IntroductionToNeogeography.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1t39FkufgCOSaVQDt_J6SSBZbX1w&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). Addressing inequalities: The heart of the post-2015 agenda and the future we want for all UN System Task Team on the post 2015 UN development Agenda. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/10_inequalities_20July.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C. (2010). Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science. Information Research, 15. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/15--3/colis7/colis708.html
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, 204–211. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B., & Sui, D. (2010). From GIS to neogeography: Ontological implications and theories of truth. Annals of GIS, 16, 197–209. doi:10.1080/19475683.2010.539985
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. C. and Gilmore, M. P. (2013). The spatial politics of affect and emotion in participatory GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 808–823. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.707596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar