4,604
Views
77
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life

, &
Pages 691-707 | Received 02 Oct 2015, Accepted 05 Jan 2016, Published online: 17 Feb 2016

References

  • Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3.
  • Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74 (3), 252–259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2673277
  • Baker, C. (2013). A connection for all ages: Enabling the benefits of high-speed Internet access for older adults. AARP Public Policy Institute, 79, 18.
  • Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013). Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1715–1724. doi:10.1016 = j.chb.2013.02.006
  • Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of a post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Blaikie, A. (1999). Ageing & popular culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189
  • Broady, T., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2010). Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 473–485.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., & McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of Internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e39. doi:10.2196/jmir.2306
  • Cotten, S. R., Ford, G., Ford, S., & Hale, T. M. (2012). Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 496–499.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Bingley, UK: Academic Press.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University, 15, 1–23.
  • Drucker, P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. London: Heineman.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
  • Gardiner, M. (2004). Everyday utopianism: Lefebvre and his critics. Cultural studies, 18(2-3), 228–254.
  • Gatto, S. L., & Tak, S. H. (2008). Computer, internet, and e-mail use among older adults: Benefits and barriers. Educational Gerontology, 34(9), 800–811. doi:10.1080=03601270802243697
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
  • Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1999). Finding your story: Data analysis. In Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman, pp.127–149.
  • Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 503–519.
  • Hale, T. M., Cotten, S. R., Drentea, P., & Goldner, M. (2010). Rural-urban differences in general and health-related Internet use. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1304–1325. doi:10.1177/0002764210361685
  • Hogan, B., & Quan-Haase, A. (2010). Persistence and change in social media: A framework of social practice. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30(5), 309–315.
  • Howard, P. N., Busch, L., & Sheets, P. (2010). Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 109–128. Retrieved from http://cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/viewArticle/2192
  • Kemman, M., Kleppe, M., & Scagliola, S. (2013). Just google it: Digital research practices of humanities scholars. Cornell Digital Libraries, 1–17.
  • Kok, A., Williams, K., & Yan, H. (2012). Seniors skyping: A professional, academic, and community collaboration. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1), 1–12.
  • Kolodinsky, J., Cranwell, M., & Rowe, E. (2002). Bridging the generation gap across the digital divide: Teens teaching Internet skills to senior citizens. Journal of Extension, 40(3). Retrieved from Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2002june/rb2.php/site_urlindex.php
  • Laslett, P. (1989). A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life (translation). London: Verso.
  • Lin, W., Lin, H., & Yueh, H. (2014). Explore elder users’ reading behaviors with online newspaper. In P. L. Patrick Rau (Ed.), Cross cultural design, 6th international conference, CCD 2014 (pp. 184–192). Crete: Springer.
  • Luyt, B., & Ann, H. S. (2011). Reading, the library, and the elderly: A Singapore case study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 43(4), 204–212.
  • Martel, L., & Ménard, F. P. (2011). Generations in Canada. Statistics Canada. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-311-x/98-311-x2011003_2-eng.cfm
  • Martin, K., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Are e-books replacing print books? Tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1016–1028. doi:10.1002/asi
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nasmith, W., & Parkinson, M. (2008). Senior citizens embrace change and make a new technology work for them. The Electronic Library, 26(5), 673–682. doi:10.1108/02640470810910693
  • Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135–1155.
  • Peacock, S. E., & Künemund, H. (2007). Senior citizens and Internet technology. European Journal of Ageing, 4(4), 191–200. doi:10.1007/s10433-007-0067-z
  • Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., & Schreurs, K. (2014). Not all on the same page: e-book adoption and technology exploration by seniors. Information Research, 19(2), 1–15. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-2/paper622.html
  • Rainie, L. (2015). Digital Divides 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/09/22/digital-divides-2015/
  • Reddick, A., Boucher, C., & Groseilliers, M. (2000). The dual digital divide: The information highway in Canada. Human resources development Canada, industry Canada (Vol. 2001). Ottawa, ON: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://olt-bta.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/publicat/index.html
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Robinson, L., et al. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 369–384. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008
  • Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., & Madden, L. (2003). Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing and Society, 23(5), 561–582. doi:10.1017/S0144686x03001302
  • Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). London: Sage.
  • Smith, A. (2014). Older adults and technology use. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/
  • Stevenson, S. (2009). Digital divide: A discursive move away from the real inequities. The Information Society, 25(1), 1–22.
  • Tsai, H. S., Shillair, R., Cotten, S. R., Winstead, V., & Yost, E. (2015). Getting grandma online: Are tablets the answer for increasing digital inclusion for older adults in the U.S.? Educational Gerontology, 41(10), 695–709. doi:10.1080/03601277.2015.1048165
  • Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society, 22(5), 279–290.
  • Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455.
  • Werner, F., Werner, K., & Oberzaucher, J. (2012). Tablets for seniors–An evaluation of a current model (iPad). In Reiner Wichert and Birgid Eberhardt (Eds.), Ambient assisted living (pp. 177–184). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27491-6_13
  • Winstead, V., Anderson, W. A., Yost, E. A., Cotten, S. R., Warr, A., & Berkowsky, R. W. (2012). You can teach an old dog new tricks: A qualitative analysis of how residents of senior living communities may use the web to overcome spatial and social barriers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32(5), 540–560. doi:10.1177/0733464811431824
  • Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2009). The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge.
  • Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/13/digital-differences/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.