The feminine style, the male influence, and the paradox of gendered political blogspace

References

• Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005, March 4). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. LinkKDD ’05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, ACM Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2000). Power-law distribution of the world wide web. Science, 287(5461), 2115–2115. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2115a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, J. (2004). Mot en digital demokrati?: Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring (Doctoral dissertation). Örebro universitetsbibliotek, Örebro.
   Google Scholar
• Åström, J., & Karlsson, M. (2013). Blogging in the shadow of parties: Exploring ideological differences in online campaigning. Political Communication, 30(3), 434–455. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H. (2000). Kommunpolitiker i den stora nyordningens tid. Liber: Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 327–343. doi: 10.2307/256204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystrom, D. G., Robertson, T., Banwart, M. C., & Kaid, L. L. (Eds.). (2005). Gender and candidate communication: Videostyle, webstyle, newstyle. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K. (1989). Man cannot speak for her (Vol. 1). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 7(2), 177–198. doi: 10.1177/1461444805050745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J.-G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Moss, G. (2008). Governing at a distance – politicians in the blogosphere. Information Polity, 13(1–2), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, K. (2014). Gender stereotypes, candidate evaluations, and voting for women candidates what really matters? Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 96–107. doi: 10.1177/1065912913487949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, K., & Lynch, T. (2014). It takes a survey: Understanding gender stereotypes, abstract attitudes, and voting for women candidates. American Politics Research, 42(4), 656–676. doi: 10.1177/1532673X13503034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekdale, B., Namkoong, K., Fung, T. K. F., & Perlmutter, D. D. (2010). Why blog? (then and now): Exploring the motivations for blogging by popular American political bloggers. New Media & Society, 12, 217–234. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, M. L., Leeden, R., & Willemsen, T. M. (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 581–598. doi: 10.1348/096317901167532
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. W. (2008). The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 15–30. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findahl, O. (2013). Svenskarna och internet 2013 [The Swedes and the Internet 2013]. Gävle: World Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Findahl, O. (2014). Svenskarna och internet 2014 [The Swedes and the Internet 2014]. Gävle: World Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilljam, M., Karlsson, D., & Sundell, A. (2010a). Politik på hemmaplan. Tiotusen fullmäktigeledamöter tycker om politik och demokrati. Stockholm: Kommentus.
   Google Scholar
• Gilljam, M., Karlsson, D., & Sundell, A. (2010b). Representationsprinciper i riksdag och kommuner. In Martin Brothén & Sören Holmberg (Eds.), Folkets representanter-En bok om riksdagsledamter och politisk representation i Sverige. Gteborg: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Gteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, D., & Tremayne, M. (2006). The gendered blogosphere: Examining inequality using network and feminist theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 247–264. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil, B., & Piskorski, M. (2009). New Twitter research: Men follow men and nobody tweets. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2009/06/new-twitter-research-men-follo
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 142–171. doi: 10.1108/09593840510601513
   Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447. doi: 10.2307/2393451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91–102. doi: 10.2307/2787014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2015). Women in parliament. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. (2006). Dipping their big toe into the blogosphere: The use of weblogs by the political parties in the 2005 general election. Aslib Proceedings, 58(4), 292–303. doi: 10.1108/00012530610687678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. (2008). ‘Scattergun’ or ‘rifle’ approach to communication: MPs in the blogosphere. Information Polity, 13, 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A., Friedman, B., & Peach, S. (2011). Standpoint in political blogs: Voice, authority, and issues. Women's Studies, 40(3), 269–298. doi: 10.1080/00497878.2010.548427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2011). Connecting citizens to the European parliament: E-consultations as a tool for political representation. In M. Z. Sobaci (Ed.), E-parliament and ICT-based legislation: Concept, experiences and lessons (pp. 80–102). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2012). Participatory initiatives and political representation: The case of local councillors in Sweden. Local Government Studies, 38(6), 795–815. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.688036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2013). Representation as interactive communication: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Information, Communication & Society, 16(8), 1201–1222. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.757633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., & Åström, J. (2014). The political blog space: A new arena for political representation? New Media & Society. Online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. A. (2009, September 3–6). All the dogs that didn't bark: Understanding the dearth of online conservative infrastructure. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J., & Lawrence, S. (2001). Network analysis: The structure of the web. Science, 294(30/11), 1849–1850. doi: 10.1126/science.1067014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenke, K. (1996). Women and leadership: A contextual perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2013). Online political communication strategies: MEPs, e-representation, and self-representation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(2), 190–207. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2012.758071
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2009). A ‘selection model’ of political representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(4), 369–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(4), 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, E., & Öhberg, P. (2013). Call me maybe? Politicians’ views of citizen-initiated contacts with elected representatives. A survey and experiment with Swedish politicians. In S. Dahlberg, H. Oscarsson, & L. Wägnerud (Eds.), Stepping stones: Research on political representation, voting behavior and quality of government (pp. 77–91). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet in democratic societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2007). Four models of political representation: British MPs and the use of ICT. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(3), 354–369. doi: 10.1080/13572330701500771
   Google Scholar
• Nowson, S., & Oberlander, J. (2006). The identity of bloggers: Openness and gender in personal weblogs. In AAAI spring symposium: Computational approaches to analyzing weblogs (pp. 163–167 ). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S., & Macafee, C. (2007). Gender differences in British blogging. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1472–1492. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, H. (2010, April 16). Cyberactivism and women in the blogosphere. Paper presented at James Madison University's first annual WRTC graduate symposium: Communication in the 21st century: Obstacles and opportunities.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio, A., & Aragon, J. (1997). ‘To boldly go (where no man has gone before)’: Women and politics in cyberspace. New Political Science, 19(Fall 1997), 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 20–34. doi: 10.2307/3088412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanne, M. (2001). Att se till helheten: Svenska kommunalpolitiker och det demokratiska uppdraget. Stockholm: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., & Benkler, Y. (2012). A tale of two blogospheres: Discursive practices on the left and right. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 459–487. doi: 10.1177/0002764211433793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Lovin, L., & McPherson, J. M. (1993). You are who you know: A network approach to gender. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 223–251). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Straits, B. C. (1996). Ego-net diversity: Same-and cross-sex coworker ties. Social Networks, 18(1), 29–45. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00254-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedesco, J. C. (2006). Web interactivity and young adult political efficacy. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign (pp. 187–202). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1183–1194. doi: 10.1177/0002764207300041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., & Sapp, A. M. (2006). Republic of blog: Examining Polish bloggers through content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 702–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00032.x
   Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2011). Communicating with voters by blogs? Campaigning for the 2009 European Parliament elections. Discourse & Communication, 5(4), 413–428. doi: 10.1177/1750481311418098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. (2010). Minskade könsskillnader i Sveriges riksdag. In M. Brothén & S. Holmberg (Eds.), Folkets representanter: En bok om riksdagsledamöter och politisk representation i Sverige (pp. 209–241). Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., Lusoli, W., & Gibson, R. (2007). Australian MPs and the Internet: Avoiding the digital age? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(2), 210–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., & Williams, C. B. (2010). Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 669–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Internet Stats. (2015). List of countries by digital access index – DAI. Retrieved June 23, 2015, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/list3.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wrenne, P. (1997). Kontakter och förankring: En studie av kommunstyrelsens ordförande. Göteborg: Cefos, Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2008). Read my day? Communication, campaigning and councillors’ blogs. Information Polity, 13(1–2), 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. (2003). Political representation in the networked society: The Americanisation of European systems of responsible party government? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(3), 32–53. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000246855
   Google Scholar