‘Warren Buffet is my cousin’: shaping public understanding of big data biotechnology, direct-to-consumer genomics, and 23andMe on Twitter

References

• 23AndMe. (2015). What the FDA decision means for 23andMe customers. 23AndMe Blog. Retrieved from http://blog.23andme.com/news/what-the-fda-decision-means-for-23andme-customers/
   Google Scholar
• Adams, S. A. (2014). Maintaining the collision of accounts: Crowdsourcing sites in health care as brokers in the co-production of pharmaceutical knowledge. Information, Communication and Society, 17(6), 657–669. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.808362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L. (2014). Alexander calls for administration to clarify position on patient access to personal health information. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.help.senate.gov/chair/newsroom/press/alexander-calls-for-administration-to-clarify-position-on-patient-access-to-personal-health-information
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E., & Benaquisto, L. (2014). Fundamentals of social research (Third Cana.). Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baudhuin, L. M. (2014). The FDA and 23andMe: Violating the first amendment or protecting the rights of consumers? Clinical Chemistry, 60(6), 835–837. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. F. (2012). The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, J. M., Green, R. C., & Kaufman, D. (2013). Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 17(5), 424–428. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry, P., Cornel, M. C., & Howard, H. C. (2010). Where are you going, where have you been: A recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market. Journal of Community Genetics, 1(3), 101–106. doi: 10.1007/s12687-010-0023-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 801–814. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., & McGuire, A. L. (2012). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Perceptions, problems, and policy responses. Annual Review of Medicine, 63(1), 23–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062110-123753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., Ries, N., Ray, P., Shuman, C., & Wilson, B. (2010). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Good, bad or benign? Clinical Genetics, 77(2), 101–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01291.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A.-S., Fleischmann, K. R., Wang, P., Ishita, E., & Oard, D. W. (2010). Values of stakeholders in the net neutrality debate: Applying content analysis to telecommunications policy. 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, C., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PloS One, 5(11), e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422(6934), 835–847. doi: 10.1038/nature01626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, S. L., Szczypka, G., Abril, E. P., Kim, Y., & Vera, L. (2014). Are you scared yet? Evaluating fear appeal messages in Tweets about the tips campaign. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 278–295. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K. R., Oard, D. W., Cheng, A. S., Wang, P., & Ishita, E. (2009). Automatic classification of human values: Applying computational thinking to information ethics. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1002/meet.2009.1450460345
   Google Scholar
• Foster, M. W., & Sharp, R. R. (2008). Out of sequence: How consumer genomics could displace clinical genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 419–419. doi: 10.1038/nrg2374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gane, M. (2008). Conflicting visions of code-work in recent social science fiction. Information, Communication & Society, 11(6), 799–815. doi: 10.1080/13691180802005220
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, T. (2010). Sergey Brin’s search for a Parkinson’s cure. Wired. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/2010/06/ff_sergeys_search/all/1
   Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., … Bernhardt, B. A. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: Perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15(1), 22–30. doi: 10.1159/000327296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2014). Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Social Networks, 38(1), 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S. W., Hornik, R. C., Schwartz, J. S., Armstrong, K. (2012). The impact of risk information exposure on women’s beliefs about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations. Clinical Genetics, 81, 29–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01797.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. C., & Farahany, N. a. (2014). Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics. Nature, 505(7483), 286–7. doi: 10.1038/505286a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. (2008). Best Inventions of 2008. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1852747_1854493_1854113,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2012). Becoming a tweep: How prior online experiences influence Twitter use. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 680–702. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.666256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A, Kelly, S. E., & Wyatt, S. (2013). Counseling customers: Emerging roles for genetic counselors in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(2), 277–288. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9548-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Wyatt, S., & Kelly, S. E. (2013). The gift of spit (and the obligation to return it) how consumers of online genetic testing services participate in research. Information, Communication & Society, 16(2), 236–257. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.701656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 10(1), 19–32. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, H. C., & Borry, P. (2009). Personal genome testing: Do you know what you are buying? The American Journal of Bioethics, 9, 11–13. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, B., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. J., Khoury, M. J., & Drazen, J. M. (2008). Letting the genome out of the bottle – will we get our wish? New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 105–107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0708162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239–259. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 639–661. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D. J., Baker, R., Milner, L. C., Devaney, S., & Hudson, K. L. (2016). A survey of US adults’ opinions about conduct of a nationwide precision medicine initiative® cohort study of genes and environment. PloS One, 11(8), e0160461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D., Murphy Bollinger, J., Devaney, S., & Scott, J. (2010). Direct from consumers: a survey of 1,048 customers of three direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing companies about motivations, attitudes, and responses to testing. In Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics in Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, J. (2008). The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Human Molecular Genetics, 17(R2), R180–R183. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, B. M. (2008). Risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer genetic testing remain unclear. JAMA, 300(13), 1503–1505. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.13.1503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S.-J., & Crawley, L. (2009). Research 2.0: Social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6–7), 35–44. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, M. (2010). Googling your genes: Personal genomics and the discourse of citizen bioscience in the network age. Journal of Science Communication, 9(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, M. L., Fishman, J. R., & Lambrix, M. A. (2010). Personal genomics and individual identities: Motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genetics and Society, 29, 261–290. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2010.507485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., Diaz, C. M., Wang, T., & Hilsenbeck, S. G. (2009). Social networkers’ attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6–7), 3–10. doi: 10.1080/15265160902928209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, R. (1994). Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. Journal of Management, 20(4), 903–931. doi: 10.1177/014920639402000410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter age. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2015). Twitter and elections: Are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz? Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 816–831. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1006659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Win Hwang, J. (2012). Roots and revelation: Genetic ancestry testing and the Youtube generation. In L. Nakamura & P. Chow-White (Eds.), Race after the internet (pp. 271–290). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, P. J., Hammitt, J. K., Mueller, C., Fillit, H. M., Hill, J., Tetteh, N. A., & Kosik, K. S. (2001). Public attitudes about genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease. Health Affairs, 20(5), 252–264. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offit, K. (2008). Genomic profiles for disease risk: Predictive or premature? JAMA, 299(11), 1353–1355. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Rodgers, S., & Stemmle, J. (2013). Analyzing health organizations’ use of twitter for promoting health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 18(4), 410–425. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.727956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pushpangadan, S., & Seckman, C. (2015). Consumer perspective on personal health records: A review of the literature. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 19(1), Retrieved from http://www.himss.org/consumer-perspective-personal-health-records-review-literature
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. S., & Ostergren, J. (2013). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and personal genomics services: A review of recent empirical studies. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 1(3), 182–200. doi: 10.1007/s40142-013-0018-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarkar, S. (1998). Genetics and reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saurabh, J. (2014). The FDA and 23andMe puts a libertarian in a dilemma. KevinMD. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/01/fda-23andme-puts-libertarian-dilemma.html
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, A., Erby, L. H., Foisie, K. V., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2012). Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: A content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 433–9. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9474-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephansen, H. C., & Couldry, N. (2014). Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: A ‘small data’ approach. Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), 1212–1227. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.902984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Su, P. (2013). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: A comprehensive view. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(3), 359–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su, Y., Howard, H. C., & Borry, P. (2011). Users’ motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: An exploratory study of personal stories. Journal of Community Genetics, 2(3), 135–146. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0048-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services. (2015). What is the cost of genetic testing, and how long does it take to get the results? Help Me Understand Genetics. Retrieved from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/testing/costresults
   Google Scholar
• Wade, C. H., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 284–292, discussion 293. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechers, I. R., Perin, N. C., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2013). The emergence of commercial genomics: Analysis of the rise of a biotechnology subsector during the Human Genome Project, 1990 to 2004. Genome Medicine, 5(9), 83. doi: 10.1186/gm487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, A., Meiser, B., Mitchell, P. B., & Schofield, P. R. (2010). Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: Preliminary findings. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18(1), 47–51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar