Satire as a source for learning? The differential impact of news versus satire exposure on net neutrality knowledge gain

References

• Aamoth, D. (2014, June 3). John Oliver’s net neutrality ran crashes FCC servers. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/2817567/john-oliver-net-neutrality-fcc/
   Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don’t expect too much! Learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research, 36(6), 783–809. doi:10.1177/0093650209346805 doi: 10.1177/0093650209346805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, D. (2014, September 26). John Oliver is doing some really good investigative journalism. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/26/john-oliver-journalism_n_5888184.html
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C. (2013). No laughing matter? Young adults and the “spillover effect” of candidate-centered political humor. Humor, 26(1), 23–43. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S., & Coleman, J. M. (2015). “Does the “road to the White House run through” Letterman? Chris Christie, Letterman, and other-disparaging v. self-deprecating humor”. Journal of Political Marketing. doi:10.1080/15377857.2015.1074137
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341–367. doi:10.1177/1532673x05280074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S., & Walth, N. L. (2012). The Fey effect: Young adults, political humor, and perceptions of Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 95–104. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. (2011). Soft news and the four Oprah effects. In G. C. Edwards, L. R. Jacobs, & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 121–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2003a). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. doi: 10.1080/10584600390211181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2003b). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2011). Political humor as democratic relief? The effects of exposure to comedy and straight news on trust and efficacy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19(5), 235–250. doi:10.1080/15456870.2011.622191
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2012). Comedy types and political campaigns: The differential influence of other-directed hostile humor and self-ridicule on candidate evaluations. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 791–812. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.628431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2013). What about those interviews? The impact of exposure to political comedy and cable news on factual recall and anticipated political expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 344–356. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2014). Playing with politics: Online political parody, affinity for political humor, anxiety reduction, and implications for political efficacy. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 424–445. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Goldberg, A. B. (2017). Entertainment, intelligent, or hybrid programming? An automated content analysis of twelve years of political satire interviews. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 25(2), 127–137. doi:10.1080/15456870.2017.1293670 doi: 10.1080/15456870.2017.1293670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Haller, B. A. (2014). When political comedy turns personal: Humor types, audience evaluations, and attitudes. Howard Journal of Communications, 25(1), 34–55. doi:10.1080/10646175.2013.835607
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. L. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, B. (2015, February 26). How John Oliver transformed the net neutrality debate once and for all. Bloomberg Politics. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-02-26/how-john-oliver-transformed-the-net-neutrality-debate-once-and-for-all
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Yeo, S. K., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Choi, D.-H., Brossard, D., … Corley, E. A. (2014). Misperceptions in polarized politics: The role of knowledge, religiosity, and media. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(03), 654–661. doi:10.1017/s1049096514000791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2008). Political comedy shows and knowledge about primary campaigns: The moderating effects of age and education. Mass Communication and Society, 11(1), 43–61. doi:10.1080/15205430701585028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2014). Is there a cost to convenience? An experimental comparison of data quality in laboratory and online studies. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(2), 120–131. doi: 10.1017/xps.2014.5
   Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S., Gotlieb, M. R., & Vraga, E. K. (2016). “That show really spoke to me!”: The effects of compatible psychological needs and talk show host style on audience activity. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1950–1970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S., Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., Thorson, K., & Thorson, E. (forthcoming). New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertories and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Esralew, S., & Young, D. G. (2012). The influence of parodies on mental models: Exploring the Tina Fey–Sarah Palin phenomenon. Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 338–352. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.688791
   Google Scholar
• Federal Communication Commission. (2015). Open internet. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov/general/open-internet.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2013). Learning about politics from The Daily Show: The role of viewer orientation and processing motivations. Mass Communication and Society, 16(4), 586–607. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.735742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., & Young, D. G. (2008). Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication, 25(4), 401–422. doi:10.1080/10584600802427013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. R., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 213–227. doi:10.1080/08838150701304621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., Becker, A. B., Lannon, B., & Pendleton, A. (2016). Narrowing the gap: Gender and mobilization in net neutrality advocacy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5908–5930. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4598/1867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J. A., Matsa, K. E., & Barthel, M. (2015, August 6). As Jon Stewart steps down, 5 facts about The Daily Show. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/06/5-facts-daily-show/
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, B. W., Gottfried, J. A., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2014). Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 329–353. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. P., & Hartelius, E. J. (2007). The political sins of Jon Stewart. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(3), 263–272. doi:10.1080/07393180701520991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmore, E. (2014, June 14). How John Oliver started a revolution in US TV’s political satire. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/jun/15/john-oliver-started-a-revolution-in-us-tv-political-satire
   Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Holbert, R. L., & Lee, J. (2011). Predicting the consumption of political TV satire: Affinity for political humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 96–114. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.542579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H. (2013). Breaking boundaries | Political interviews: Examining perceived media bias and effects across TV entertainment formats. International Journal of Communication, 7(0). Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1942/1864
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H., & Young, D. G. (2011). Satire, punch lines, and the nightly news: Untangling media effects on political participation. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 159–168. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.565278
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4), 402–415. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, E. (2014, June 3). John Oliver helps rally 45,000 net neutrality comments to FCC. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2014/06/03/318458496/john-oliver-helps-rally-45-000-net-neutrality-comments-to-fcc
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You dont need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 338–360. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L. (2013). Breaking boundaries| When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7(20). Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1939
   Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L., & Walther, W. (2013). Ability matters: Testing the differential effects of political news and late-night political comedy on cognitive responses and the role of ability in micro-level opinion formation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 303–322. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. B. (2015, May 21). Network neutrality, explained. Vox. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/cards/network-neutrality/whats-network-neutrality
   Google Scholar
• Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1). doi:10.1177/2158244016636433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2013). Elaboration or distraction? Knowledge acquisition from thematically related and unrelated humor in political speeches. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 291–302. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S.N. (2014, June 4). John Oliver’s net neutrality rant may have caused FCC site crash. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/06/04/john-olivers-net-neutrality-rant-may-have-caused-fcc-site-crash/
   Google Scholar
• Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 198–210. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Guse, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. doi:10.1080/03637750701196896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necka, E. A., Cacioppo, S., Norman, G. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016). Measuring the prevalence of problematic respondent behaviors among MTurk, campus, and community participants. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niven, D., Lichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(3), 118–133. doi:10.1177/1081180x03008003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. (2014, June 1). Net neutrality. Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpbOEoRrHyU
   Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20(2), 149–171. doi:10.1080/10584600390211172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, T. F. (2014, August 14). How John Oliver beats apathy. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/08/how-john-oliver-is-procuring-latent-activism/376036/
   Google Scholar
• Suebaseng, A. (2014, September 29). ‘Last Week Tonight’ does real journalism, no matter what John Oliver says. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/29/last-week-tonight-does-real-journalism-no-matter-what-john-oliver-says.html
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Edgerly, S., Bode, L., Carr, D. J., Bard, M., Johnson, C. N., … Shah, D. V. (2012). The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 5–22. doi:10.1177/1077699011428575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, F. (2015, April 9). John Oliver talked to Edward Snowden about how the government is spying on your dick pics. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2015/04/06/john_oliver_talks_to_edward_snowden_about_your_dick_pics_for_last_week_tonight.html
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 2, 141–179.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/10584600903053569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2006). Late-night comedy and the salience of the candidates’ caricatured traits in the 2000 election. Mass Communication and Society, 9(3), 339–366. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0903_5
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11(1), 119–142. doi:10.1080/15213260701837073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 153–169. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G., & Tisinger, R. M. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 113–134. doi:10.1177/1081180x05286042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar