I do not believe you: how providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms

References

• Al-Qahtani, A. A., Nazir, N., Al-Anazi, M. R., Rubino, M. R., & Al-Ahdal, M. N. (2016). Zika virus: A new pandemic threat. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 10(3), 201–207. doi: 10.3855/jidc.8350
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2014). How social media reduces mass political polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. working paper. Retrieved from http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Hanna, A., Yang, J. H., & Shah, D. V. (2015). Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression: Strategic Hashtag use in the 2010 midterms. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 149–165. doi: 10.1177/0002716214563923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65, 619–638. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. (in press). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Polete, B. (2011). Information credibility on Twitter. In WWW ’11 proceedings of the 20th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 675–684). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & gil de Zuniga, H. (2016). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1875–1895. doi: 10.1177/1461444815616224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, G., & Clarke, C. (2013). The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism–vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Education Research, 28(2), 352–359. doi: 10.1093/her/cys110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dredze, M., Broniatowski, D. A., & Hilyard, K. M. (2016). Zika vaccine misperceptions: A social media analysis. Vaccine, 34, 3441–3442. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. (2015). The demographics of social media users. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 570–578. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Shelton, A. K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 372–376. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. (2012). Social media sway: Worries over political misinformation on Twitter attract scientists' attention. Science News, 182(8), 22–25. doi: 10.1002/scin.5591820826
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social media affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64, 590–611. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, A., & Margolis, M. (2014). The political consequences of uninformed voters. Electoral Studies, 34(1), 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37, 255–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. doi: 10.1177/0003122412438225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, E. (2016). Was Zika outbreak caused by release of genetically modified mosquitoes in Brazil? The Mirror. Retrieved from http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/zika-outbreak-caused-release-genetically-7281671
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318. doi: 10.1177/0002764211409378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives/
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866–883. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahng, M. R., & Littau, J. (2016). Interacting is believing: Interactivity, social cue, and perceptions of journalistic credibility on Twitter. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 38–58. doi: 10.1177/1077699015606680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. (in press). From code to discourse: Social media and linkage mechanisms in deliberative systems. Journal of Public Deliberation.
   Google Scholar
• Maireder, A., & Ausserhofer, J. (2013). Political discourses on Twitter: Networking topics, objects and people (pp. 291–341). Twitter and Society. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., & Shearer, E. (2016). The modern news consumer: News attitudes and practices in the digital era. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the ‘death panel’ myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1). doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1354
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318279486b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyeyemi, S. O., Gabarron, E., & Wynn, R. (2014). Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination? BMJ, 349, g6178–g6178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to metacognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 137–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69–81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radzikowski, J., Stefanidis, A., Jacobsen, K. H, Croitoru, A., Crooks, A., & Delamater, P. L. (2016). The measles vaccination narrative in Twitter: A quantitative analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2(1), e1. doi:10.2196/publichealth.5059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reedy, J., Wells, C., & Gastil, J. (2014). How voters become misinformed: An investigation of the emergence and consequences of false factual beliefs. Social Science Quarterly. Online first. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojecki, A., & Meraz, S. (2016). Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society, 18, 25–43. doi: 10.1177/1461444814535724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, L. (2014). Invisible risks, emotional choices – mammography and medical decision making. New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 1549–1552. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1409003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., Yadav, K., Yadav, N., & Ferdinand, K. C. (2017). Zika virus pandemic – analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. American Journal of Infection Control, 45(3), 301–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journal and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 974–991. doi: 10.1177/107769909607300415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication, and Society, 14, 872–895. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon, O. (2016). In firing human editors, Facebook has lost the fight against fake news. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/29/facebook-trending-news-editors-fake-news-stories
   Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., & Mason, R. M. (2014). Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing. In iConference 2014 proceedings (pp. 654–662). Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafuri, S., Gallone, M. S., Cappelli, M. G., Martinelli, D., Prato, R., & Germinario, C. (2014). Addressing the anti-vaccination movement and the role of HCWs. Vaccine, 32(38), 4860–4865. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Edgerly, S., Ekdale, B., Schrock, A., Swartz, L., … Wells, C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter, and the occupy movement: Connecting content and circulation practices. Information, Communication, & Society, 16, 421–451. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K. (2014). Facing an uncertain reception: Young citizens and political interaction on Facebook. Information, Communication, and Society, 17, 203–216. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.862563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26, 309–328. doi: 10.1111/comt.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189.
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(1), 281–289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171–183. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2016a). WHO Director-General summarizes the outcome of the Emergency Committee regarding clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2016/emergency-committee-zika-microcephaly/en/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2016b). Dispelling rumours around Zika and complications. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/articles/rumours/en/
   Google Scholar
• Worth, K. (2016). As Brazil confronts Zika, vaccine rumors shape perceptions. Frontline. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/as-brazil-confronts-zika-vaccine-rumors-shape-perceptions/
   Google Scholar