Facing up to Facebook: how digital activism, independent regulation, and mass media foiled a neoliberal threat to net neutrality

References

• Agrawal, R. (2016, February 9). Why India rejected Facebook’s ‘free’ version of the Internet. Mashable, Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2016/02/09/why-facebook-free-basics-failed-india/#ChrWqoSN8uqB
   Google Scholar
• Babu, A. (2016, January 5). Why Free Basics is so contentious in India. Business Standard, p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (2009). Social construction of technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen, & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of technology (pp. 88–94). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2009). Topic models. Retrieved from http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~blei/papers/BleiLafferty2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. L., & Barrow, S. C. (2009). The political economy of free speech and network neutrality: A critical analysis. Journal of Media Law and Ethics, 1(1/2), 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Standard. (2015, December 30). The Free Basics debate. Business Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, B. A. (2006). Misusing network neutrality to eliminate common carriage threatens free speech and the postal system. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 33, 483–511.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, V. (2016, January 9). Facebook spends around Rs300 crore on Free Basics ad campaign in India. Mint.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. (1985). How the refrigerator got its hum. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (pp. 202–218). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deccan Chronicle. (2015, February 10). Now users can enjoy zero data charges on Facebook and others. Deccan Chronicle.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. Government arts funding. Poetics, 41, 570–606. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Express Computer. (2013, August 21). Facebook’s Zuckerberg launches internet.org portal. Express Computer.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2016). Facebook reports fourth quarter and full year 2015 results. Retrieved from http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=952040
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Express. (2013, September 2). Battle for the next billion clicks. Financial Express.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Express. (2015, December 11). What is TRAI trying to fix? Financial Express.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Flanagin, C., & Flanagin, J. (2010). Technical code and the social construction of the internet. New Media & Society, 12(2), 179–196. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, S. K. (2004). Rhetorical criticism. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, M. (2015, December 17). Facebook turns evil. Trak.in.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, A. E. (2008). Net neutrality: Background and issues. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. CRS Report for Congress, RS22444.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. W., & Wallsten, S. (2006). The economics of net neutrality. Economists’ Voice, 3(6), 1–7. doi: 10.2202/1553-3832.1194
   Google Scholar
• Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hindu. (2016, January 1). Consultation papers are not opinion polls, says TRAI chief. The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• Hindustan Times. (2016a, February 10). A Facebook board member wants to bring colonialism back to India. Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Hindustan Times. (2016b, January 20). TRAI raps Facebook, Apple Stores in India: Tech news you need to know. Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., & Milan, S. (2009). At the margins of internet governance: Grassroots tech groups and communication policy. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 5, 23–38. doi: 10.1386/macp.5.1-2.23_1
   Google Scholar
• Hogendorn, C. (2005). Regulating vertical integration in broadband: Open access versus common carriage. Review of Network Economics, 4(1), 19–32. doi: 10.2202/1446-9022.1064
   Google Scholar
• Indo-Asian News Service. (2015, April 15). Zuckerberg says his new platform can co-exist with net neutrality. Indo-Asian News Service.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, C., van Atteveldt, W., & Welbers, K. (2016). Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modelling. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 89–106. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. (2015, December 23). Facebook initiates blitzkrieg ad campaign for Free Basics in India ahead of Dec. 31 deadline. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2015/12/23/facebook-free-basics-net-neutrality-india/#vVWrs1gKx5qw
   Google Scholar
• Karr, T. (2015). Internet.Not. New Perspectives Quarterly, 32(3), 13–16. doi: 10.1111/npqu.11520
   Google Scholar
• Kern, T. (2008). Soziale Bewegungen: Ursachen, Wirkungen, Mechanismen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loblich, M., & Wendelin, M. (2012). ICT policy activism on a national level: Ideas, resources and strategies of German civil society in governance processes. New Media & Society, 14(6), 899–915. doi: 10.1177/1461444811432427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical approach. London: Macmilllan.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (1987). Missile accuracy: A case study in the social processes of technological change. In T. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 195–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 769–787. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597. doi: 10.1177/0049124112437709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesevic, S. (2006). Identity as ideology: Understanding ethnicity and nationalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, A. K. (2002). MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. Retrieved from http://mallet.cs.umass.edu
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. (2013, August 25). India a huge opportunity, says Mark Zuckerberg. Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. (2014, October 10). Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg in India, looks to work with PM Narendra Modi on connecting villages. Economic Times.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press Trust of India. (2015, April 15). Now, Cleartrip reboots, logs out of internet.org. Press Trust of India.
   Google Scholar
• Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2), 134–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01063.x
   Google Scholar
• Quail, C., & Larabie, C. (2010). Net neutrality: Media discourses and public perception. Global Media Journal, 3(1), 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• SavetheInternet.in Coalition. (2015, April 16). Dear Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook is not, and should not be the internet. Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, S. (2016a). Right to be forgotten: How national identity, political orientation, and capitalist ideology structured a trans-Atlantic debate on information access and control. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 360–382. doi: 10.1177/1077699016638835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin, S. (2016b). When scale meets depth: Integrating natural language processing and textual analysis for studying digital corpora. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 28–50. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2015.1118447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• TechTree.com. (2015, December 24). Why TRAI Put The Brakes On Free Basics. TechTree.com.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T. K. (2014, July 3). We are in the process of monetisation in India. Business Line.
   Google Scholar
• Times of India. (2015a, April 14). Flipkart pulls out of Airtel’s net neutrality violating Airtel Zero. Times of India.
   Google Scholar
• Times of India. (2015b, December 18). Facebook is selling old wine (internet.org) in a new bottle (Free Basics). Times of India.
   Google Scholar
• Trai. (2016, February 8). TRAI Releases the ‘Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulation, 2016’. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Press Release No. 13/2016. Retrieved from http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/PressRealease/Document/Press_Release_No_13%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 2, 141–179.
   Google Scholar
• Your Story. (2014, October 11). Mark Zuckerberg’s tryst with India, Modi and ‘Chandauli’. Your Story.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerberg, M. (2015, December 28). Free Basics protects net neutrality. Times of India.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerberg, M. (n.d.). Is connectivity a human right? Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/isconnectivityahumanright.
   Google Scholar