Contentious connective action: a new kind of life-political association for problematizing how expert systems operate

References

• Bang, H. P. (2003). Governance as social and political communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2004). Culture governance: Governing self-reflexive modernity. Public Administration, 82(1), 157–190. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2005). Among everyday makers and expert citizens. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance: Peoples, politics and the public sphere (pp. 159–178). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2010). Everyday makers and expert citizens: Active participants in search for a new governance. In J. Fenwick, & J. McMillan (Eds.), Public management in the postmodern Era: Challenges and prospects (pp. 163–192). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2015). Foucault’s political challenge. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2016). Interactive governance: A challenge to institutionalism. In J. Edelenbos (Ed.), Critical reflections on interactive governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, K. (2014). Rancière, politics, and the occupy movement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 886–901. doi: 10.1068/d5013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2012). Recent shifts in the relationship between the internet and democratic engagement in Britain and the United States: Granularity, informational exuberance, and political learning. In E. Anduiza, M. C. Jensen, & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Chicago: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Feher, M. (2009). Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital. Public Culture, 21(1), 21–41. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2008-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schramm, S. (2012). Real social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1997). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115–132. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI355
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. (2016). The rise of information activism: How to bridge dualisms and reconceptualise political participation. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1119872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Wyn, J., & Younes, S. (2010). Beyond apathetic or activist youth ‘ordinary’ young people and contemporary forms of participation. Young, 18(1), 9–32. doi: 10.1177/110330880901800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2010). Online political mobilization from the advocacy group’s perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7–41. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1098
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. D. (2012). Building a progressive movement in 2012. Souls, 14(1–2), 10–18. doi: 10.1080/10999949.2012.723413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2012). Political participation among the young in Australia: Testing Dalton’s good citizen thesis. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 211–226. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2012.677003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2003). Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice. Report for the Council of Europe Symposium. Strasbourg. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ostman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, T., Lister, M., Marsh, D., Jones, S., & McDonagh, A. (2003). Tuning out or left out? Participation and non-participation among young people. Contemporary Politics, 9(1), 45–61. doi: 10.1080/1356977032000072477
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. M. (2014). New media and public activism: Neoliberalism, the state and radical protest in the public sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, T. J. (1995). Aristotle: Politics: Books I and II. Wotton-under-Edge Gloucestershire: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters: Making democracy work. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, A., & Collin, P. (2010). Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people. Young, 18(1), 97–112. doi: 10.1177/110330880901800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar