The effect of comment moderation on perceived bias in science news

References

• Akin, H., Rose, K. M., Scheufele, D. A., Simis-Wilkinson, M., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., & Corley, E. A. (2017). Mapping the landscape of public attitudes on synthetic biology. BioScience, 67(3), 290–300. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, KS: American Association for Public Opinion Research. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edw022. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2014). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 135–156. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edt032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(3), 373–400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi: 10.1111/J.1460-2466.2008.00410.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström, A., & Wadbring, I. (2014). Beneficial yet crappy: Journalists and audiences on obstacles and opportunities in reader comments. European Journal of Communication. doi: 10.1177/0267323114559378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. doi: 10.1177/0093650212449353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293. doi: 10.1037/h0046049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. doi: 10.1080/13691180110097030
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24(1), 101–117. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407–432. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2015). Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion. New Media & Society, 17(5), 772–791. doi: 10.1177/1461444813513259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2014). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31(4), 564–583. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GfK Knowledge Networks. (2013). KnowledgePanel design summary. Retrieved from http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/knpanel/docs/knowledgePanel(R)-design-summary-description.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, L. (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1287–1305. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147–167. doi: 10.1086/269308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 449–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Binder, A. R., Becker, A. B., Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The role of perceptions of media bias in general and issue-specific political participation. Mass Communication & Society, 14(3), 343–374. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.491933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors? Human Communication Research, n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khushf, G. (2007). The ethics of NBIC convergence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(3), 185–196. doi: 10.1080/03605310701396950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBarre, S. (2013, September 24). Why we’re shutting off our comments. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, M., & Hmielowski, J. (2012). Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 13(3), 303–319. doi: 10.1177/1464884911421696
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(01), 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2016). Science and Engineering indicators 2016 (No. NSB-2016-1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. W. J., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), 32. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirenberg, M. W. (1967). Will society be prepared? Science, 157(3789), 633–633. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3789.633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42–55. doi: 10.1037/h0048153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer: How Internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Z. (2011). User comments: The transformation of participatory science. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, & rina Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism (pp. 96–117). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444340747.ch6/summary
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist: Audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 125–143. doi: 10.1177/1354856509347719
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 121–138. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Micó, J. L., Díaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487. doi: 10.1177/1940161211415849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 418–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Communicating science in social settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Suppl 3), 14040–14047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213275110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. C. (2012). Online news and the demise of political disagreement. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 36, pp. 45–53). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B5WvkZDHlIq5aWN3Z3l4UzJHRTA
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 14(4), 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, R., Messaris, P., & Cappella, J. N. (2014). Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 975–990. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., Duyn, E. V., & Peacock, C. (2016). News commenters and news comment readers (engaging news project). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://engagingnewsproject.org/enp_prod/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ENP-News-Commenters-and-Comment-Readers1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A. L. (2014). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L. Y.-F., Akin, H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2015). Science news consumption patterns and their implications for public understanding of science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/1077699015586415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Ekdale, B. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 289–313. doi: 10.1080/15205430903225571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAN-IFRA. (2013). Online comment moderation: Emerging best practices. Darmstadt: World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 24–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar