Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere

References

• Ball, J. (2011, August 9). Riot cleanup campaign launched on Twitter and Facebook. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/aug/09/riot-cleanup-campaign-twitter-facebook
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2013). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.986349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, W. L. (2014). Connective action: The public’s answer to democratic dysfunction. The Conversation.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Honolulu, HI, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the networked society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., & Crain, R. L. (2014). Socially networked citizen science and the crowd-sourcing of pro-environmental collective actions. In N. Agarwal, M. Lim, & R. Wigand (Eds.), Online collective action: Dynamics of the crowd in social media (pp. 133–152). Verlag-Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & List, C. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1017/S0007123403000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmer, G., Elmer, G., McKelvey, F., & Devereaux, Z. (2009). Networked publics: The double articulation of code and politics on facebook. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(2009), 415–434.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (2012). Network as metaphor. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(2), 912–921.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 35–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R. W. (2011). The archive and the processor: The internal logic of Web 2.0. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1228–1244. doi: 10.1177/1461444811401735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943–965. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2015). Everyday political talk in the internet-based public sphere. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of digital politics (pp. 247–263). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Potts, J. (2014). Cultural science – The evolution of meaningfulness. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, R. (2012). Not ready for democracy: Social networking and the power of the people. The Revolts of 2011 in a Temporalized Context. Arab Media & Society, 15, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1954/2013). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). The synthetic situation: Interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), 61–87. doi:10.1525/si.2009.32.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2000). Manufacturing dissent: New democracy and the era of computer communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1), 103–122. doi: 10.1177/136787790000300106
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2005). Language wars: The role of media and culture in global terror and political violence. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pond, P. (2016a). Questions, time, and tweets: Exploring network temporality and social media engagement with televised political debate. Television & New Media, 17(2), 142–158. doi: 10.1177/1527476415616190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pond, P. (2016b). Software and the struggle to signify: theories, tools and techniques for reading Twitter-enabled communication during the 2011 UK Riots (Doctor of Philosophy). RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J. (2013). Book review: The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(4), 498–500. doi: 10.1177/1940161215599940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, J. T., Smith, A., Parish, M., & Rickhoff, A. (2014). Using contemporary collective action to understand the use of computer-mediated communication in virtual citizen science. In N. Agarwal, M. Lim, & R. Wigand (Eds.), Online collective action: Dynamics of the crowd in social media (pp. 121–132). Verlag-Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2012). What is in PageRank? A historical and conceptual investigation of a recursive status index. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies, 2, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 3–14). New York: Peter Laing.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. W. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and Society, 27(6), 845–872. doi: 10.1023/A:1006975321345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. (2014). Sentiment analysis and time series with Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, & M. Mahrt (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. doi: 10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltevrede, E., Helmond, A., & Gerlitz, C. (2014). The politics of real-time: A device perspective on social media platforms and search engines. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(6), 125–150. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, E. (2016). Discourses and differences: Situating pro-Palestine activism in discursive context. Theory in Action, 9(3), 48–71. doi: 10.3798/tia.1937-0237.16018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar