4,096
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

I like what I see: studying the influence of popularity cues on attention allocation and news selection

Pages 286-305 | Received 17 Aug 2016, Accepted 08 Sep 2017, Published online: 27 Sep 2017

References

  • Agapie, E., & Munson, S. A. (2015, May). Social cues and interest in reading political news stories. ICWSM, Oxford.
  • Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the ‘new’ news patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180–207. doi: 10.1177/0093650202029002004
  • Barthel, M., Shearer, E., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2015). The evolving role of news on Twitter and Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolving-role-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/
  • Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066. doi: 10.3758/bf03213926
  • Briggs, S. R., Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1980). An analysis of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 679–686. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.679
  • Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. doi: 10.1177/1461444812440159
  • Bucher, H.-J., & Schumacher, P. (2006). The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications, 31, 347. doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.022
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032–1043. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032
  • Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Douglas, S., Maruyama, M., Semaan, B., & Robertson, S. P. (2014). Politics and young adults: The effects of Facebook on candidate evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
  • Fu, W. W., & Sim, C. C. (2011). Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2382–2395. doi: 10.1002/asi.21641
  • Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530–555. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.530
  • Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The Like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. doi: 10.1177/1461444812472322
  • Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172
  • Kim, H. S., & Shyam Sundar, S. (2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.039
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York,NY: Routledge.
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 296–313. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3
  • Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 580–604. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0026
  • Lee, E. J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37(6), 825–846. doi: 10.1177/0093650210376189
  • Lünich, M., Rössler, P., & Hautzer, L. (2012). Social navigation on the internet: A framework for the analysis of communication processes. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4), 232–249. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2012.744244
  • Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements Trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406
  • Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nir, L. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq076
  • Orquin, J. L., & Mueller Loose, S. (2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 190–206. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003
  • Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
  • Redlawsk, D. P., & Pierce, D. (2014). How social cues influence political information processing strategies. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Glasgow, Scotland. Retrieved from http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/2e70bd63-68ac-4788-9dea-eb8f60c740ab.pdf
  • Stayman, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: Effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2), 125–142. doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80053-8
  • Vraga, E., Bode, L., & Troller-Renfree, S. (2016). Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 149–164. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443
  • Webster, J. G. (2016). Why study measures of exposure? From exposure to attention. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 179–180. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150974
  • Winter, S., Brückner, C., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). They came, they liked, they commented: Social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(8), 431–436. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0005
  • Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2012). Selecting science information in Web 2.0: How source cues, message sidedness, and need for cognition influence users’ exposure to blog posts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 80–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01596.x
  • Yang, J. (2016). Effects of popularity-based news recommendations (‘most-viewed’) on users’ exposure to online news. Media Psychology, 19(2), 243–271. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1006333

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.