Who likes to be reachable? Availability preferences, weak ties, and bridging social capital

References

• Ames, M. G. (2013). Managing mobile multitasking: The culture of iPhones on Stanford campus. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1487–1498). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, L., Dadlani, P., Dwyer, M., Hampton, K., Kitzie, V., Matni, Z. A., … Teodoro, R. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 398–416. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.884612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2011). Concerns about mobile phones: A cross-national study. First Monday, 16. doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i8.3335
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26, 128–149. doi: 10.1111/comt.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashears, M. E., & Quintane, E. (2015). The microstructures of network recall: How social networks are encoded and represented in human memory. Social Networks, 41, 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2015). Mobile communication and network privatism: A literature review of the implications for diverse, weak, and new ties. Review of Communication Research, 3, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19–36. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
   Google Scholar
• Eden, J., & Veksler, A. E. (2016). Relational maintenance in the digital age: Implicit rules and multiple modalities. Communication Quarterly, 64, 119–144. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., Taylor, S. E., Gable, S. L., Hilmert, C. J., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. Neuroimage, 35, 1601–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Y. C., Ho, H. C., & Chen, H. M. (2013). Weak ties and contact initiation in everyday life: Exploring contextual variations from contact diaries. Social Networks, 35, 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., & Wu, Y. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in others … Unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 384–398. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Baym, N. K. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14, 316–331. doi: 10.1177/1461444811415047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N. (2016). Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 101–124. doi: 10.1177/0002764215601714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Lee, C. J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13, 1031–1049. doi: 10.1177/1461444810390342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8, 125–147. doi: 10.1080/13691180500146185
   Google Scholar
• Helliwell, J. F. K., & Putnam, R. D. K. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1435–1446. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., & Okabe, D. (2005). Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use. Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, 20, 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T., Boase, J., Suzuki, T., & Suzuki, T. (2015). Emerging from the cocoon? Revisiting the tele-cocooning hypothesis in the smartphone era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 330–345. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuru, O., & Pasek, J. (2016). Improving social media measurement in surveys: Avoiding acquiescence bias in Facebook research. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, B. (2016). Personality and social networks in organizations: A review and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S107–S121. doi: 10.1002/job.2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., & Mazer, J. P. (2014). Do online communication attitudes mitigate the association between Facebook use and relational interdependence? An extension of media multiplexity theory. New Media & Society, 16, 806–822. doi: 10.1177/1461444813495159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Taylor, S. H., & Mazer, J. P. (2016). Enjoyment fosters media use frequency and determines its relational outcomes: Toward a synthesis of uses and gratifications theory and media multiplexity theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 135–156. doi: 10.1068/d323t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2016). Soft coercion: Reciprocal expectations of availability in the use of mobile communication. First Monday, 21. doi: 10.5210/fm.v21i9.6814
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., Bjelland, J., Sundsøy, P. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Small circles: Mobile telephony and the cultivation of the private sphere. The Information Society, 30, 282–291. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2014.915279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCormick, J. S., Dery, K., & Kolb, D. G. (2012). Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the ‘porcupine problem’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M. (2013). Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1225–1250. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miritello, G., Moro, E., Lara, R., Martínez-López, R., Belchamber, J., Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. (2013). Time as a limited resource: Communication strategy in mobile phone networks. Social Networks, 35, 89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, D. R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/
   Google Scholar
• RamirezJr, A., & Broneck, K. (2009). ‘IM me’: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 291–314. doi: 10.1177/0265407509106719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 910–922. doi: 10.1177/0146167214529799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, V., Azmitia, M., & Whittaker, S. (2016). Unplugged: Exploring the costs and benefits of constant connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. M. (2016). Permanently online – permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2006). On and off the ’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., & Birnholtz, J. (2015). From ambient to adaptation: Interpersonal attention management among young adults. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 26–35). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. B., & Miller, C. H. (2010). A measure of weak-tie/strong-tie support network preference. Communication Monographs, 77, 500–517. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.502538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. B., Rains, S., & Banas, J. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar