Revolution postponed? Tracing the development and limitations of open content filmmaking

References

• Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the internet Age. Amsterdam: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., Caliandro, A., Cossu, A., Deka, M., Gandini, A., Luise, V., & Anselmi, G. (2017). Commons based peer production in the information economy (Report). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/29210209/Commons_Based_Peer_Production_in_the_Information_Economy
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, G., Franklin, M., Giannatou, E., Stewart, J., & Williams, R. (2018). Revolution Remixed? The emergence of Open Content Filmmaking as a viable component within the mainstream film industry. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1465109
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M. (2005). The Political Economy of Peer Production, CTheory, 12–1. Retrieved from http://www.ctheory.net/printer.aspx?id=499, last sampled 9 October 2017
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2016). Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strategic Organization, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., Chin, B., & Jones, B. (2015). Crowdfunding [special issue]. New Media and Society, 17(2), 141–148. doi: 10.1177/1461444814558906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Harvard: Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, I., & Geuna, A. (2007). Remixing cinema: The case of the Brighton Swarm of Angels. The Freeman Centre, University of Sussex: SPRU Working Paper Series, Retrieved from: www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp165.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008). Copyright and innovation: freedom to innovate. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/Documents/435-Jessica_Coates.pdf sampled 06/12/2008)
   Google Scholar
• Coombe, R. J. (2004). Commodity culture, private censorship, branded environments, and global trade politics: Intellectual property as a topic of Law and society research. In A. Sarat (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to Law and society (pp. 369–391). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, R. (1995). Law’s community: Legal theory in sociological perspective. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CREATe. (2017). Theme 2: openness and open business models; RCUK Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy, Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://www.create.ac.uk/research-programme/theme-2/ last sampled 1 November 2017
   Google Scholar
• Dulong De Rosnay, M. (2006). Creative commons: Open content licenses to govern creative works. Upgrade, European Journal for the Informatics Professional, VII(3), 38–40. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00120068
   Google Scholar
• Elkin-Koren, N. (2005). What contracts can’t do: the limits of private ordering in facilitating a creative commons. Fordham Law Review, Vol.74. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=760906
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, W. T. (Ed.). (2007). Intellectual property. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. (2009). Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. California: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. (2008). Hacking: Digital media and technological determinism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. (2006). The consequences of information: Institutional implications of technological change. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2014). Network society and future scenarios for a collaborative economy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from max weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259. doi: 10.1177/1461444810370951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production: The power of mass creativity. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C., & Oakley, K. (2005). Why cultural entrepreneurs matter. In J. Hartley (Ed.), Creative industries (pp. 299–311). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture. New York: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. (1996). Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. London: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999 [1985]). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516–531. doi: 10.1080/09502380210139098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESTA. (2015). Managing the commons in the knowledge economy, National Endowment for Science, Technology and The Arts, London. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/d-cent_managing_the_commons_in_the_knowledge_economy.pdf last sampled 13 Nov 2017
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2008). Tragedy of the commons. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 6716–6719). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. First Monday, 2. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1472/1387
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salt, B. (2009). Film style and technology. London: Starword.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organisations. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, I. E. (2012). Crowdsourcing and outsourcing: The impact of online funding and distribution on the documentary film industry in the UK. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 726–743. doi: 10.1177/0163443712449499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Learning technology, constructing culture. Sociotechnical change as social learning. STS working paper no 18/96. University of Trondheim: Centre for Technology and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything first. London: Atlantis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tehranian, J. (2007). Infringement nation: Copyright reform and the law/norm Gap. Utah Law Review, 537–569. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1029151
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Harvard: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 856–899. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Stewart, J., & Slack, R. (2005). Social learning in technological innovation: Experimenting with information and communication technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar