93
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Reviews

The possibility of enmemberment

Pages 458-466 | Received 07 Jun 2018, Accepted 21 Aug 2018, Published online: 12 Sep 2018

References

  • Alper, M., & Goggin, G. (2017). Digital technology and rights in the lives of children with disabilities. New Media & Society, 19(5), 726–740. doi: 10.1177/1461444816686323
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. ( C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press.
  • Bialka, C. S. (2015). Deconstructing dispositions: Toward a critical ability theory in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 37(2), 138–155. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2015.1004602
  • Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The power of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
  • Cashio, T. (2018). Full access for gamers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Cook-Sather, A., & Shore, E. (2007). Breaking the rule of discipline in interdisciplinarity: Redefining professors, students, and staff as faculty. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2), 1–12. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp
  • Danforth, S. (2016). Social justice and technocracy: Tracing the narratives of inclusive education in the USA. Discourse-Studies in The Cultural Politics of Education, 37(4), 582–599. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1073022
  • Darder, A. (2017). Pedagogy of love: Embodying our humanity. In A. Darder, R. D. Torres, & M. Baltodano, (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 95–110). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Darder, A., Torres, R. D., & Baltodano, M. (2017). The critical pedagogy reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., McNamara, D., & Dessus, P. (2015). Readerbench: Automated evaluation of collaboration based on cohesion and dialogism. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 395–423. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03419-5_9 doi: 10.1007/s11412-015-9226-y
  • Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dei, G. S., & Jaimungal, C. S. (2018). Indigeneity and decolonial resistance: An introduction. In G. S. Dei, & C. S. Jaimungal (Eds.), Indigeneity and decolonial resistance: Alternatives to colonial thinking and practice (pp. 1–14). Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press.
  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
  • Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. London: Routledge.
  • Erevelles, N. (2016). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Gartner. (2014). Hype cycles 2014: Research methodologies. Gartner. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle
  • Harry, B., & Klingner, J. K. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education?: Understanding race & disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hess, J. (2018). A “discomfortable” approach to music education re-envisioning the “strange encounter.”. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 26(1), 24–45. doi: 10.2979/philmusieducrevi.26.1.03
  • hooks, b. (2017). Confronting class in the classroom. In A. Darder, R. D. Torres, & M. Baltodano (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 412–417). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Lang, J. M. (2016). Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • McLaren, P. (2013). A critical patriotism for urban schooling: A call for a pedagogy against fear and denial and for democracy. Texas Education Review, 1, 234–253. Retrieved from http://txedrev.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/McLaren_A-Critical-Patriotismfor-Urban-Schooling_TxEdRev.pdf
  • McLaren, P. (2017). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, R. D. Torres, & M. Baltodano (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 56–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McNeil, J. (2009). Contemporary curriculum in thought and action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Molin, M., & Sorbring, E. (2017). Editorial: Internet use and disability. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), doi: 10.5817/CP2017-1-xx
  • Noguera, P. A. (2017). Introduction to “Racial inequality and education: Patterns and prospects for the future”. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 129–135. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2017.1280753
  • Paraskeva, J. (2016). Curriculum epistemicide: Towards an itinerant curriculum theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Phillips, S. (2016). Brown is the new white: How the demographic revolution has created a new American majority. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Riguet, M., & Mpouli, S. S. (2017). At the crossroads between the scientific and the literary discourse: Comparison as a figure of dialogism. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(60), 77. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqx026
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Scuro, J. (2018). Addressing ableism: Philosophical questions via disability studies. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Sheldon, A. (2004). Changing technology. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers enabling environments (pp. 155–160). London: : Sage.
  • Spencer, D. C. (2014). Exposing the conditions of precarity: Compounding victimization and marginalized young people. Contemporary Justice Review, 17(1), 87–103. doi: 10.1080/10282580.2014.883846
  • Tatum, B. D. (2017). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?": And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Torres, V., Howard-Hamilton, M. F., & Cooper, D. L. (2003). Identity development of diverse populations: Implications for teaching and administration in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Wheeler-Bell, Q. (2017). Standing in need of justification: Michael Apple, R.S. Peters and Jurgen Habermas. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(4), 561–578. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2017.1279219

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.