Self as enterprise: digital disability practices of entrepreneurship and employment in the wave of ‘Internet + disability’ in China

References

• Abrams, L. S. (2010). Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research: The case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 536–550.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, A., & Kreps, D. (2009). Disability and discourses of web accessibility. Information, Communication & Society, 12(7), 1041–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, B., Summerville, J., Knox, M., Brown, A. R., & Dillon, S. (2013). Digital technologies and musical participation for people with intellectual disabilities. New Media & Society, 15(4), 501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Public Welfare. (2017). Alleviating poverty for people with disabilities is a strategy in Ali’s strategy. Retrieved from http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6GmSxbBg3VnwMyGTKKR_YQ
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A., & Abbariki, M. (2017). Competencies of disabled entrepreneurs in Iran: Implications for learning and development. Disability & Society, 32(1), 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajde, D. (2013). Marketized philanthropy: Kiva’s utopian ideology of entrepreneurial philanthropy. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, W.-N., & Haas, A. (2009). Social change, life strain and delinquency among Chinese urban adolescents. Sociological Focus, 42(3), 285–305.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (1999). Disability and paid employment. Work, Employment & Society, 13(1), 147–149.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., & Sheldon, A. (2010). Disability, politics and poverty in a majority world context. Disability & Society, 25(7), 771–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, K., Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2017). Precarious lives and resistant possibilities: The labour of people with learning disabilities in times of austerity. Disability & Society, 32(2), 160–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, J., Larsson, S., & Östergren, P. (2011). The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom? Disability & Society, 26(2), 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, precarity and sexual politics. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 04(3), i–xiii.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D., & Wesson, C. (2016). Digital inclusion and disability. In A. Attrill, & C. Fullwood (Eds.), Applied cyberpsychology: Practical applications of cyberpsychological theory and research (pp. 1–23). Nottingham, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5, 376–397.
   Google Scholar
• China Disable Persons’ Federation (CDPF). (2012). The statistic of disabilities in China until 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cdpf.org.cn/sjzx/cjrgk/201206/t20120626_387581.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, S., Taylor, T., & Green, J. (2016). ‘But I can do the job:’ Examining disability employment practice through human rights complaint cases. Disability & Society, 31(9), 1242–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart, R. (2004). Being ‘business-like’ in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 290–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauncey, S. (2012). Three days to walk: A personal story of life writing and disability consciousness in China. Disability & Society, 27(3), 311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhurst, M. (2017). We are not entrepreneurs. In M. Graham, & J. Shaw (Eds.), Towards a fairer gig economy (pp. 20–23). Oxford, UK: Meatspace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, C. (2013). An examination of the Internet’s development as a disabling environment in the context of the social model of disability and anti-discrimination legislation in the UK and USA. Universal Access in the Information Society, 12, 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access: Media, disability, and the politics of participation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K., & Jing, L. (2008). Chinese disability independent living policy. Disability & Society, 23(2), 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2017). Engaging with materialism and material reality: Critical disability studies and economic recession. Disability & Society, 32(2), 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedner, M. I. (2015). Valuing deaf worlds in urban India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2006). Disability, identity, and interdependence: ICTs and new social forms. Information, Communication and Society, 9(3), 309–311.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London, UK: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., & Svarverud, R. (2010). IChina: The rise of the individual in modern Chinese society. Copenhagen, Denmark: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. P., Owen, R., & Gould, R. (2011). The parity of participation in liberal welfare states: Human rights, neoliberalism, disability and employment. Disability & Society, 27(6), 826–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M., & Honneth, A. (2006). Paradoxes of capitalism. Constellations (Oxford, England), 13(1), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. (2006). Autonomous choices and patriotic professionalism: On governmentality in late-socialist China. Economy & Society, 35(4), 550–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Guo, B., & Bricout, J. C. (2009). From concentration to dispersion the shift in policy approach to disability employment in China. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20(1), 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. K., & Brandon, T. (2015). A comparative examination of policy and models of disability in Korea and the UK. Language of Public Administration and Qualitative Research, 3(1), 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. K., & Roulstone, A. (2015). Enterprising? Disabled? The status and potential for disabled people’s microenterprise in South Korea. Disability & Society, 30(1), 114–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. K., & Latreille, P. L. (2011). Disability and self-employment: Evidence for the UK. Applied Economics, 43(27), 4161–4178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, M. (2010). Ethnography essentials: Designing, conducting, and presenting your research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kohrman, M. (2005). Bodies of difference experiences of disability and institutional advocacy in the making of modern China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, J. M. (2017a). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: In response to Mike Oliver. Disability & Society, 32(4), 589–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, J. M. (2017b). Developing a model of disability that focuses on the actions of disabled people. Disability & Society, 32(5), 735–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Yang, L., & Zhang, Z. A. (2018). To include, or not to include, that is the question: Disability digital inclusion and exclusion in China. New Media & Society, online. doi: 1461444818774866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., & Zhou, L. (2016, March 25). Website helps the disabled to find jobs. China Daily. Retrieved from https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/kindle/2016-03/25/content_24096032.htm
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J., & Zhang, C. (2015). Seeking self-governance: From grassroots mobilization to movement mobilization. The China Nonprofit Review, 7(2), 329–344.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhulu, A. M. (2016). Introduction: Welfare and precarity. South Atlantic Quarterly, 115(1), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2017). Entrepreneurial subjects: Venturing from alley to valley. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2026–2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2009). Self as enterprise dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault’s: The birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. (2000). Disability on a different model: Glimpses of an Asian heritage. Disability & Society, 15(4), 603–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, personal and social life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Sinanan, J. (2014). Webcam. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. (2015). Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability. Disability & Society, 30(3), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395.
   Google Scholar
• Namatovu, R., Dawa, S., Mulira, F., & Katongle, C. (2012). Entrepreneurs with Disabilities in Uganda. Research Report. Retrieved from http://trustafrica.org/en/publications-trust/icbe-research-reports?download=62:entrepreneurs-with-disability-in-uganda&start=40
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2010). Disability studies, disabled people and the struggle for inclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, V., Wong, Y. C., & Pierini, J. (2002). The structure and content of social inclusion: Voices of young adults with learning difficulties in Guangzhou. Disability & Society, 17(4), 365–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierini, J., Pearson, V., & Wong, Y. C. (2001). Glorious work: Employment of adults with a learning disability in Guangzhou from the perspective of their parents. Disability & Society, 16(2), 255–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2009). Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 19(2), 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Renko, M., Harris, S. P., & Caldwell, K. (2015). Entrepreneurial entry by people with disabilities. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 555–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2017). Entrepreneuring the good life? International Journal of Communication, 11, 2017–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofel, L. (2007). Desiring China: Experiments in neoliberalism, sexuality, and public culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, F., Yalcin, B., & Priestley, M. (2017). Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E., Gordon, J., Harvey, C., & Maclean, M. (2013). Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(5), 580–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud, A. B. (2017). Precarious entrepreneurship: Mobile phones, work and kinship in neoliberal Peru. Social Anthropology, 25(2), 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E. (1996). A law to protect, a law to prevent: Contextualising disability legislation in China. Disability & Society, 11(4), 469–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoreau, E. (2006). Ouch!: An examination of the self-representation of disabled people on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 442–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregaskis, C. (2002). Social model theory: The story so far. Disability & Society, 17, 457–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, C. E. (1993). The development of public policy and new laws concerning the rights of people with disabilities in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4(1), 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, M. R., & Lopez, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society, 26, 48–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton, R., & Schuer, S. (2006). Towards socio-spatial inclusion? Disabled people, neoliberalism and the contemporary labour market. Area, 38(2), 186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xun, Z. (2002). The discourse of disability in modern China. Patterns of Prejudice, 36(1), 104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Y. (2009). The individualization of Chinese society. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. (2015). Institutions and life for people with disability: From ‘individual model’ to ‘universal model.’. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 35(6), 85–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yapp, H. (2017). Disability as exception: China, race, and human rights. American Quarterly, 69(3), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. (2017). ‘Nothing about us without us:’ The emerging disability movement and advocacy in China. Disability & Society, 32(7), 1096–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Ong, A. (2008). Privatizing China: Socialism from afar. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2015, July 13). ‘Internet +’ Helps Disabled people’ employment. Guangzhou Daily, F02.
   Google Scholar