Don’t read the comments: the effects of abusive comments on perceptions of women authors’ credibility

References

• Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect:” online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andsager, J. L., & Mastin, T. (2003). Racial and regional differences in readers’ evaluations of the credibility of political columnists by race and sex. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. L., & McAdams, M. J. (2009). Blogs of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2012). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. doi: 10.1177/0093650212449353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, J. (2012). Social networking. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-SocialNetworking-full-detail.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart, F. N., & Sigelman, C. K. (1990). Byline bias? Effects of gender on news article evaluations. Journalism Quarterly, 67(3), 492–500. doi: 10.1177/107769909006700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M. (2017). Online incivility and public debate: Nasty talk. Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56273-5
   Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin, L., & Roberts, C. (2016). Presence of online reader comments lowers news site credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 37(4), 365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Dulin, A. M. (2007). A lesson on social role theory: An example of human behavior in the social environment theory. Advances in Social Work, 8(1), 104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S. (2017). Net neutrality: Too neutral on online abuse. The Gender Policy Report. Retrieved from http://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/net-neutrality-too-neutral-on-online-abuse/
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., & Steiner, L. (2013). (Re)triggering backlash: Responses to news about Wikipedia’s gender gap. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(4), 284–303.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 683–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, B., Mansfield, M., Anderson, I., Holder, J., Louder, D., & Ulmanu, M. (2016, April 12). The dark side of Guardian comments. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/12/the-dark-side-of-guardian-comments
   Google Scholar
• Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1989). Gender voices. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2015). A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, L., & Otterbacher, J. (2012, February). Learning the lingo? Gender, prestige and linguistic adaptation in review communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 305–314). Seattle, WA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2010). Who’s got the floor in computer-mediated conversation? Edelsky’s gender patterns revisited. Language@Internet, 7(8), 8. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2857
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing gender authenticity in computer-mediated language Use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 424–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Stoerger, S. (2013). Gender and (a)nonymity in computer-mediated communication. In J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff, & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (2nd ed., pp. 1–22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2009). Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market. Written Communication, 26(1), 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, B. J., Hansen, G. J., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2014). Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Working paper, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, M. (2013). Women in TV broadcast news: Reporters and sources in hard news stories. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 4(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. (2004). Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images (pp. 231–236). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K. (2015). The relational turbulence model: Communicating during times of transition. Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, 2, 377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. H., & Cho, D. (2017). Swearing effects on citizen-to-citizen commenting online. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 84–102. doi: 10.1177/0894439315602664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBarre, S. (2013, September 24). Why we’re shutting off our comments. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J. (2003). Effects of “gender” of the computer on informational social influence: The moderating role of task type. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(4), 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J. (2007). Categorical person perception in computer-mediated communication: Effects of character representation and knowledge bias on sex inference and informational social influence. Media Psychology, 9(2), 309–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J. (2008). Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: The moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(11), 789–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J. (2012, October 10). That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37(6), 825–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantilla, K. (2013). Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies A Special Issue: Categorizing Sexualities, 39(2), 563–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashable. (2012). “63% of retweets are of male users.” Mashable Social Media, July 30. http://mashable.com/2012/07/30/men-dominate-retweets/
   Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A., & Trumbo, C. W. (2001). Source credibility in environmental health - risk controversies: Application of meyer's credibility index. Risk Analysis, 21(3), 467–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Molenda, A. K., & Cramer, C. R. (2015). Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 194–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Stroud, N. J. (2017). News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 586–609. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, C. (2014, April 12). Sick of internet comments? Us too – here’s what we’re doing about it. The Chicago Sun Times. Retrieved from http://voices.suntimes.com/news/sick-of-web-comments-us-too-heres-what-were-doing-about-it/
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. W., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), 00–00. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/ng.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortutay, B. (2013, December 26). How sites like YouTube are combating nasty commenters. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/26/youtube-commenters-_n_4504185.html
   Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., Weber, P., & Schweiger, W. (2016). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 62–78. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198.
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, K. (2014, January 21). Gender and the female journalist who dares read the Internet. LA Observed. Retrieved from http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2014/01/the_next_civil_rights_iss.php
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K., & Carter, C. (2011). Women and news: A long and winding road. Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), 1148–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverblatt, A. (2004). Media as social institution. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, L. (1998). Newsroom accounts of power at work. In C. Carter, G. Branston, & S. Allan (Eds.), News, Gender and power (pp. 145–159). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., Van Duyn, E., & Peacock, C. (2016). News commenters and news comment readers. Engaging News Project. Retrieved from https://engagingnewsproject.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/ENP-News-Commenters-and-Comment-Readers1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital media, youth, and credibility, 73100.
   Google Scholar
• Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro, H. M. (2005). Public perceptions of credibility of male and female sportscasters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• von Sikorski, C. (2016). The effects of reader comments on the perception of personalized scandals: Exploring the roles of comment valence and commenters’ social status. International Journal of Communication, 10(22), 4480–4501.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J., Stoerger, S., & Kelley, K. (2011, June 16). Longitudinal gender and age bias in a prominent new media community. New Media & Society, 14(7), 7–27. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410390
   Google Scholar
• Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Groner, R. (2008). How gender and age affect newscasters’ credibility ‒ an investigation in Switzerland. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 466–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. E. (2012, October 19). The War on 12-year-old girls. Salon. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/the_war_on_12_year_old_girls/
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S., & Yee, N. (2009). Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 700–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar