Disability citizenship and digital capital: the case of engagement with a social enterprise telco

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: Summary of findings, 2012 (Cat No. 4430.0). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/4430.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Communication and Media Authority. (2013). Communications report 2011-12 series, Report 3 ‒ Smartphones and tablets take-up and use in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/acmaSlideShare/acma-communications-report-201112-series-report-3-smartphones-and-tablets
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2012). The new leviathan: A national disability insurance scheme. The Centre for Independent Studies Policy Monograph 131. Retrieved from https://www.cis.org.au/images/stories/policy-monographs/pm-131.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (2010). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organisations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. London: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buckmaster, L., & Thomas, M. (2009). Social inclusion and social citizenship towards a truly inclusive society. Parliament of Australia (Research Paper No. 08 2009–10). Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp0910/10rp08#_Toc244315401
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Government. (2013). National disability insurance scheme – our history. Retrieved from http://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/our-history
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., Knox, M., & Parmenter, T. (2014). Mobile technology in inclusive research: Tools of empowerment. Disability & Society, 29(7), 999–1012. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.886556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy, S., Green, J., & Maxwell, H. (2017). I’ve got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(4), 341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy, S., Maxwell, H., & Green, J. (2016). Disability citizenship and independence through mobile technology? A study exploring adoption and use of a mobile technology platform. Disability & Society, 31(4), 497–519. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1179172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawans, V., Alter, K., & Miller, L. (2009). The four lenses strategic framework: Toward an integrated social enterprise methodology. Virtue Ventures LCC. Disponível em http://www. virtueventures.com/files/fourlenses.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. (1973). Information needs of urban residents: A conceptual context. In E. Warner, et al. (Ed.), Information needs of urban residents. Final report. Baltimore, MD/Rockville, MD: Regional Planning Council/Westat Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED088464.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases (Working Paper #15). Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/~artspol/workpap/WP15%20-%20DiMaggio%2BHargittai.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, E. L., Theodoros, D., & Russell, T. G. (2015). Usability-for-one. Work, 52(1), 211–213. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furneaux, C., & Ryan, N. (2014). Modelling NPO–government relations: Australian case studies. Public Management Review, 16(8), 1113–1140. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.895030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1050438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2010). The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disability & Society, 25(4), 427–439. doi: 10.1080/09687591003755815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Telecommunications Union & G3ict. (2012). Making mobile phones and services accessible for persons with disabilities. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Digital-Inclusion/Persons-with-Disabilities/Documents/Making%20Mobile-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, A. J. (1966). Neighborhood Information Centers: A study and some proposals. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshed, A., & Sophia, I. (2015). The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 344–365. doi: 10.1108/ITP-04-2014-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbetter, C. (1997). The rise of social entrepreneurship. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J., & Hutchison, P. (2003). Individualised support and funding: Building blocks for capacity building and inclusion. Disability & Society, 18(1), 71–86. doi: 10.1080/713662196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. J., & Clayton, J. (2012). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society, 28(5), 702–718. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.732538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. (1965). Class, citizenship and social development. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD. Paris, 30(1), 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. (2010). Redefining disability: A rejoinder to a critique. Etikk i Praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 4(1), 125–135. doi: 10.5324/eip.v4i1.1744
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J. (2002). The change in emphasis from people to person: Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., French, S., & Cameron, C. (2003). Controversial issues in a disabling society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569–583. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society, social aspects of the new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., & Mäkelä, P. (2009). The ontology of disability and impairment: A discussion of the natural and social features. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas, & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 42–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J. (2006). The information revolution and developing countries. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D., & Shulman, J. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar