What is platform governance?

References

• Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. doi: 10.1177/1461444816676645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARTICLE 19. (2018). Self-regulation and ‘hate speech’ on social media platforms. London. Retrieved from https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Self-regulation-and-‘hate-speech’-on-social-media-platforms_March2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (Eds.). (2004). Power in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2018). Fairness and machine learning. Retrieved from https://fairmlbook.org/
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., Hood, S., & Ziewitz, M. (2013). Governing algorithms: A provocation piece. Presented at the governing algorithms: A conference on computation, automation, and control, New York University. Retrieved from https://governingalgorithms.org/resources/provocation-piece/
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E. J., Owen, T., Brown, P. D., Hauka, C., & Rashidian, N. (2017). The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University. doi: 10.7916/D8R216ZZ
   Google Scholar
• Bikert, M. (2018, April 24). Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals process. Facebook newsroom. Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/.
   Google Scholar
• Bivens, R. (2017). The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 19(6), 880–898. doi: 10.1177/1461444815621527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2007). New media as material constraint: An introduction to platform studies. In Proceedings of the first international HASTAC conference (pp. 176–193). Durham, NC: Lulu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2009). Platform studies: Frequently questioned answers. In Proceedings of the digital arts and culture conference. Irvine, CA. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/01r0k9br
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, I., & Marsden, C. (2015). Regulating code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 254–278). London: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781473984066
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951715622512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, R., & boyd, d. (2018). Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook. Big Data & Society, 5(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951718757253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K. (2009). Cyber civil rights. Boston University Law Review, 89, 61–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K., & Wittes, B. (2017). The internet will not break: Denying bad samaritans sec. 230 immunity. Fordham Law Review, 86, 401–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society. doi: 10.1177/2053951716679678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N., Friedler, S., Arenas, M., Barocas, S., Hay, M., Howe, B., … Zevenbergen, B. (2016). Principles for Accountable Algorithms. FAT/ML. Retrieved from http://www.fatml.org/resources/principles-for-accountable-algorithms
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12(2), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguay, S., Burgess, J., & Suzor, N. (2018). Queer women’s experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence. doi: 10.1177/1354856518781530
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm: Why a right to an explanation is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16, 18–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13(2), 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. A. (2007). Business power in global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics & Society, 41(2), 183–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garton Ash, T., Gorwa, R., & Metaxa, D. (2019). Glasnost! nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/ourresearch/glasnost-nine-ways-facebook-can-make-itself-better-forum-free-speech-and-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Gasser, U., & Schulz, W. (2015). Governance of online intermediaries: Observations from a series of national case studies (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2566364). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2566364
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2015). Platforms intervene. Social Media+Society, 1(1). doi: 10.1177/2056305115580479
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018a). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018b). Regulation of and by platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 254–278). London: SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781473984066
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T., & Seaver, N. (2015). Critical algorithm studies: A reading list. Microsoft Research, New England: Social Media Collective. Retrieved from https://socialmediacollective.org/reading-lists/critical-algorithm-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. L. (2018). The failure of internet freedom. New York, NY: Knight First Amendment Institute. Retrieved from https://knightcolumbia.org/content/failure-internet-freedom
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. L., & Wu, T. (2006). Who controls the internet?: Illusions of a borderless world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golla, S. J. (2017). Is data protection law growing Teeth: The current lack of sanctions in data protection law and administrative fines under the GDPR. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 8, 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., & Garton Ash, T. (Forthcoming). Democratic transparency in the platform society. In N. Persily & J. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M. (2018). Understanding and improving privacy ‘audits’ under FTC Orders (Stanford CIS White Paper). Retrieved from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2018/04/understanding-improving-privacy-audits-under-ftc-orders
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelmann, J. (2015). The virtues of moderation. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2007). The social, political, economic, and cultural dimensions of search engines: An introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 769–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauben, M., & Hauben, R. (1997). Netizens: On the history and impact of Usenet and the Internet. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2017.1391913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media+Society, 1(2). doi: 10.1177/2056305115603080
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, M. (2017). Programmed inequality: How Britain discarded women technologists and lost its edge in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Primitives of legal protection in the Era of data-driven platforms. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 252(2), 252–273.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Heald, D. (Eds.). (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. E., & Thiruvathukal, G. K. (2012). Codename revolution: The Nintendo Wii platform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, D. (2018). A human rights approach to platform content regulation. Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Retrieved from https://freedex.org/a-human-rights-approach-to-platform-content-regulation/
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D. (2018, September 11). Don’t force google to export other countries’ laws. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/10/opinion/google-right-forgotten.html
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D. (Forthcoming). Facts and where to find them: Empirical foundations for policymaking affecting platforms and online speech. In N. Persily & J. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, L. M. (2017). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, 126(3), 712–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., & Persily, N. (2018). A new model for industry-academic partnerships (SSRC Working Paper). Retrieved from https://gking.harvard.edu/partnerships
   Google Scholar
• Klonick, K. (2017). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131, 1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & Mcgregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. Presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, G. (2013). Participatory culture and the new governance of communication: The paradox of participatory media. Television & New Media, 14(2), 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2006). Code 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Media regulation: Governance and the interests of citizens and consumers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Matias, J. N., & Mou, M. (2018). Civilservant: Community-led experiments in platform governance. In 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mikler, J. (2018). The political power of global corporations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (Eds.). (2018). Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers West, S. (2018). Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444818773059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. (2013). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, V., Bright, J., Margetts, H., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Public policy in the platform society. Policy & Internet, 9(4), 368–373. doi: 10.1002/poi3.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naughton, J. (2000). A brief history of the future: The origins of the Internet. London: Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Nicas, J., & Rosenberg, M. (2018, November 26). A look inside the tactics of definers, Facebook’s attack Dog. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/15/technology/facebook-definers-opposition-research.html
   Google Scholar
• Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444818769694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2017). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444817701318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooren, P., van Gorp, N., van Eijk, N., & Fathaigh, RÓ. (2018). Should we regulate digital platforms? A new framework for Evaluating policy options. Policy & Internet, 10(3), 264–301. doi: 10.1002/poi3.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, C. (2014). Intermediary liability for harmful speech: Lessons from abroad notes. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 28, 289–324.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2016). Two narratives of platform capitalism. Yale Law & Policy Review, 35(1), 309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2018). Tech platforms and the knowledge problem. American Affairs, 2(2). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3197292
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. doi: 10.1177/1461444816661553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Van Dijck, J., & Nieborg, D. (2018). Platform power & public value. Presented at the association of internet researchers annual conference (#AoIR2018), Montreal, Canada, October 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2018, November 20). Break up Facebook (and while we’re at it, Google, Apple and Amazon). The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/20/facebook-google-antitrust-laws-gilded-age
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. T. (2018). Digital detritus: “error” and the logic of opacity in social media content moderation. First Monday, 23(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8283
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E.-O. (Eds.). (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 3(2), 189-212.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism (challenging the corporate sharing economy). New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T., & Schneider, N. (Eds.) (2017). Ours to hack and to own: The rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. New York, NY: OR Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. (2018). Regulating intermediaries to protect privacy online – the case of the German NetzDG. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3216572
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, J. A. (2017). Platform logic: An interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy & Internet, 9(4), 374–394. doi:10.1002/poi3.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaban, H. (2018, January 23). Google for the first time outspent every other company to influence Washington in 2017. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/23/google-outspent-every-other-company-on-federal-lobbying-in-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. (1986). Codes of conduct for transnational corporations: The case of the WHO/UNICEF code. International Organization, 40(4), 815–840. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1991). Big business and the state. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(2), 245–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives (Draft). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from doi:10.31235/osf.io/ack26.
   Google Scholar
• Suzor, N., Van Geelen, T., & Myers West, S. (2018). Evaluating the legitimacy of platform governance: A review of research and a shared research agenda. International Communication Gazette. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/112749/
   Google Scholar
• Syal, R. (2017, December 13). Make Facebook liable for content, says report on UK election intimidation. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/13/make-facebook-liable-for-content-says-report-on-uk-election-intimidation
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2). doi: 10.1177/2053951717736335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons, H., & Kozlowska, H. (2018, March 22). Facebook’s quiet battle to kill the first transparency law for online political ads. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1235363/mark-zuckerberg-and-facebooks-battle-to-kill-the-honest-ads-act/.
   Google Scholar
• Tisne, M. (2018, December 14). It’s time for a bill of data rights. MIT technology review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612588/its-time-for-a-bill-of-data-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to Turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, G. (Ed.). (2014). Corporations and citizenship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ustun, B., Spangher, A., & Liu, Y. (2019). Actionable recourse in linear classification. In ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAT*’19). Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06514
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a Connective world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1977). Storm over the multinationals: The real issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 31(2).
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, H. (2014). Big data, machine learning, and the social sciences: Fairness, accountability, and transparency. Presented at the neural information processing systems workshop on fairness, accountability, and transparency in machine learning, Montreal, Canada, December 12.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltevrede, E., & Borra, E. (2016). Platform affordances and data practices: The value of dispute on Wikipedia. Big Data & Society, 3(1). doi:10.1177/2053951716653418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2018). Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 95–112. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2018). The curse of bigness: Antitrust in the new gilded age. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerberg, M. (2018, November 15). A blueprint for content governance and enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/a-blueprint-for-content-governance-and-enforcement/10156443129621634/.
   Google Scholar