Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: an applied data justice framework

References

• Ali, A., Qadir, J., Ur Rasool, R., Sathiaseelan, A., Zwitter, A., & Crowcroft, J. (2016). Big data for development: Applications and techniques. Big Data Analytics, 1(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Baud, I. (2016). Digitisation and participation in urban governance. In G. M. Gomez & P. Knorringa (Eds.), Local governance, economic development and institutions (pp. 86–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berdou, E. (2011). Mediating voices and communicating realities. Brighton: IDS University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T., Miller, M. A., Phelps, N. A., & Taylor, J. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 857–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A., Wilson, B., Sarraf, S., & Jana, A. (2015). Open data for informal settlements. Journal of Urban Management, 4(2), 74–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, C., & Thatcher, J. (2014). What does a critical data studies look like, and why do we care? Society + Space, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., & Perini, F. (2016). Researching the emerging impacts of open data. Journal of Community Informatics, 12(2), 148–178.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. (2012). Seeing like a slum. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Winter/Spring, 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Feruglio, F., & Rifai, A. (2017). Participatory budgeting in Indonesia. Making All Voices Count.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability. World Development, 72, 346–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillos, T. (2017). Participatory budgeting and the poor. World Development, 96, 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, E. (2011). Mapping change. Innovations, 6(1), 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, E. (2017). Open mapping from the ground up. Making All Voices Count.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2017a, May 22–24). Data justice. Presentation at IFIP WG9.4 conference ICTs for Promoting Social Harmony, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2017b). A structural model and Manifesto for data justice for international development (GDI Development Informatics Working Paper No.69). Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Renken, J. (2018). Data justice for development. Information Development, 34(1), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. (2016). Big data for development. Development Policy Review, 34(1), 135–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jobst, M., & Malherbe, M. (2017). Participatory budgeting in Pune. Sweden: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014a). The real-time city? GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014b). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data Infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. (2018). Towards critical data studies. In J. Thatcher, J. Eckert, & A. Shears (Eds.), Thinking big data in geography (pp. 3–20). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacic, P., & Lundine, J. (2013). Mapping Kibera. In S. Livingston & G. Walter-Drop (Eds.), Bits and atoms (pp. 115–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, R., & Desouza, K. C. (2015). Chennai, India. Cities, 42, 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshetri, N. (2014). The emerging role of big data in key development issues. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (Eds). (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty. ACT: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lokanathan, S. (2017). Mapping big data for development and the global goals. Colombo: LIRNEasia.
   Google Scholar
• Lokanathan, S., Kreindler, G. E., de Silva, N. N., Miyauchi, Y., Dhananjaya, D., & Samarajiva, R. (2016). The potential of mobile network big data as a tool in Colombo’s transportation and urban planning. Information Technologies & International Development, 12(2), 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundine, J., Kovacic, P., & Poggiali, L. (2012). Youth and digital mapping in urban informal settlements. Children Youth and Environments, 22(2), 214–233.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, L. (2018). Left to other peoples’ devices? A political economy perspective on the big data revolution in development. Development and Change, 49(1), 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, S. (2013). Participatory budgeting in Pune. Pune: Centre for Environment Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2013). Urban poverty in the global south. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G., Tanweer, A., Fiore-Gartland, B., & Osburn, L. (2017). Critique and contribute. Big Data, 5(2), 85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obermayr, C. (2017). Sustainable city management. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Otiso, K. M. (2002). Forced evictions in Kenyan cities. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 23(3), 252–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan, V., Raman, N. V., & Shekhar, S. (2013). Plan B: Practical Strategies to improve planning in Indian cities. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Panek, J., & Sobotova, L. (2015). Community mapping in urban informal settlements. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 68(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., & Baptist, C. (2012). Documenting by the undocumented. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, K., & Verrest, H. (2016). Perspectives on the role of geo-technologies for addressing contemporary urban issues. European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privacy International. (2017). Smart cities: Utopian vision, dystopian reality. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rifai, A., Asterina, N., & Hidayani, R. (2016). Improving the transparency, inclusivity and impact of participatory budgeting in Indonesian cities. Making All Voices Count.
   Google Scholar
• Samarajiva, R., Lokanathan, S., Madhawa, K., Kreindler, G., & Maldeniya, D. (2015). Big data to improve urban planning. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(22), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, R., Heeks, R., Chattapadhyay, S., & Foster, C. (2017). Exploring big data for development (GDI Development Informatics Working Paper No.66). Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, S. (2012, November 22–24). The unequal access to municipal services and the role of local elected representatives. Paper presented at N-AERIS XIII, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, S. (2016). Introduction: (Re)prioritising citizenship in smart cities governance. In S. Shekhar (Ed.), (Re)prioritizing citizenship: Setting a new agenda for smart cities governance (pp. 5–8). Chennai: CAG.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, S., & Padmanabhan, V. (2015). The quality of civic data in India and the implications on the push for open data. Chennai: Transparent Chennai, Institute for Financial Management and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shkabatur, J. (2014). Interactive community mapping. In S. Bailur & B. Gigler (Eds.), Closing the feedback loop (pp. 71–106). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• SKK. (2010). Gilingan neighbourhood Map. Solo: Solo Kota Kita.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. K. (2016). Planning with urban informality. International Development Planning Review, 38(4), 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, S., & Baker, J. (2015). Big data and international development. Brighton: IDS, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., & Broeders, D. (2015). In the name of development. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 64, 229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., & Richter, C. (2015). Big data and urban governance. In J. Gupta, K. Pfeffer, H. Verrest, & M. Ros-Tonen (Eds.), Geographies of urban governance (pp. 175–191). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2014). A world that counts: Mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2016). World cities report 2016. Nairobi: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2017). New urban agenda. Nairobi: Author.
   Google Scholar
• van Veenstra, A. F., Esmeijer, J., Bakker, T., & Kotterink, B. (2014). Data and the city. Delft: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. (Ed.). (2017). Whose right to the smart city? Plymouth: Plymouth University.
   Google Scholar