Mediated grassroots collective action: negotiating barriers of digital activism

References

• Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Askanius, T., & Uldam, J. (2011). Online social media for radical politics: Climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal Electronic Governance, 4(1/2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V. (2009). Mediating political action: Internet related beliefs and frustrations amongst international solidarity campaigns in Britain. Digithum, (11). doi: 10.7238/d.v0i11.87
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M. T., Mercea, D., & Charpentier, A. (2015). Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 320–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. doi: 10.1177/0267323112441007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S. (2011, February). Political activities on the internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2). Retrieved from https://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767
   Google Scholar
• Comunello, F., Mulargia, S., & Parisi, L. (2016). The ‘proper’ way to spread ideas through social media: Exploring the affordances and constraints of different social media platforms as perceived by Italian activists. The Sociological Review, 64(3), 515–532. doi: 10.1111/1467954X.12378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641–3656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. ( S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2013). Political opportunity/ political opportunity structure. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. New York: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm159
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrica, D., & Bakardjieva, M. (2018). The personalization of engagement: The symbolic construction of social media and grassroots mobilization in Canadian newspapers. Media, Culture & Society, 40(6), 817–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative media and social network sites: The politics of individuation and political participation. The Communication Review, 14(3), 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Fominaya, C. F., & Gillan, K. (2017). Navigating the technology-media-movements complex. Social Movements Studies, 16(4), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Mihailidis, P. (Eds.). (2016). Civic media: Technology, design, practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp, A. (2012). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2016). Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Steirnstedt, F. (2014). Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1154–1168. doi: 10.1177/1461444814544001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A. (2009). New media, mediation, and communication study. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 303–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lokman, T. (2015). The coming colonization of Hong Kong cyberspace: Government responses to the use of new technologies by the umbrella movement. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 1–9. doi: 10.1080/17544750.2015.1058834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A. (2017). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 494–505. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271. doi: 10.1111/comt.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, P. (2013). Mediation practice and lay theories of news media. In B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and protest movement (pp. 47–74). Bristol, UK: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercea, D., Iannelli, L., & Loader, B. D. (2016). Protest communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015). When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg, M. (2018). Mediatization and the technologization of discourse: Exploring official discourse on the internet and information communications technology within the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. New Media & Society, 20(2), 515–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E. (2015). Decmocratizing Kompromat: The affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1157–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Kendizior, S. (2012). Networked authoritarianism and social media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T. (2014). Social media and the transformation of activist communication: Exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 716–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & Borra, E. (2011). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Social media and activist communication. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 527–537). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History, 33(4), 761–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., Van Deth, J. W., & Garcia-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the occupy wall street, Indignados, and Aganasktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2015). Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the #YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: An examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS Bulletin, 47(1), 127–138. Retrieved from http://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/idsbo/article/view/41/html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2014). Social movements and governments in the digital age: Evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2015). Facebook said its algorithms do help form echo chambers, and the tech press missed it. New Perspectives Quarterly, 32(3), 9–12. doi: 10.1111/npqu.11519
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1976). Developments in the sociology of culture. Sociology, 10(3), 497–506.
   Google Scholar
• Youmans, W. L., & York, J. C. (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 315–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar