Trolls maintained: baiting technological infrastructures of informational justice

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The “Nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, R. (2016). [Aristotle], On trolling. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, FirstView, 1–3. doi: 10.1017/apa.2016.9
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. (2014). The Dark Net: Inside the digital underworld. London: William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? New Media and Society, 11(6), 985–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, A. (2012). Don’t feed the trolls! Managing troublemakers in magazines’ online communities. Journalism Practice, 6, 547–562.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2012). The psychology of trolling and lurking: The role of defriending and gamification for increasing participation in online communities using seductive narratives. In Virtual community participation and motivation: Cross-disciplinary theories (pp. 160–176). Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2014a). Representations of ‘trolls’ in mass media communication: A review of media-texts and moral panics relating to ‘internet trolling’. International Journal Of Web Based Communities, 10, 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2014b). Dealing with internet trolling in political online communities: Towards the this is why we can’t have nice things scale. Int. J. E-Polit, 5(4), 1–20. doi: 10.4018/ijep.2014100101
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. (1976/1991). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, A. (2012). Tubes: A journey to the center of the internet. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. V. (2016). From LOL to LULZ, the evolution of the internet troll over 24 years. Fusion. Retrieved from http://fusion.net/story/281916/history-of-trolling/
   Google Scholar
• Brunton, F., & Coleman, G. (2014). Closer to the metal. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, Materiality, and society (pp. 77–97). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrington, I. (2016). Networks of New York: An illustrated field guide to urban internet infrastructure. London: Melville House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, M. (2009). At the foundations of information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 57–69. doi: 10.1007/s10676-009-9181-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, T. (1997). alt.folklore.urban Frequently Asked Questions. Internet FAQ Archives. Retrieved from http://www.faqs.org/faqs/folklore-faq/part1/
   Google Scholar
• Chui, M., Löffler, M., & Roberts, R. (2010). The Internet of Things. Mckinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/the-internet-of-things
   Google Scholar
• Claire, H. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(2), 215. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistle blower, spy: The many faces of Anonymous. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Schaafsma, J., & Antheunis, M. (2018). Under the bridge: An in-depth examination of online trolling in the gaming context. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3323–3340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, I., Chesney, T., Logan, B., & Madden, N. (2009). Griefing in a virtual community: An exploratory survey of second-Life residents. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy and Technology, 29, 245–268.
   Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L. (2012). Hidden Levers of internet control: An infrastructure-based theory of internet governance. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 720–738. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.659199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Seta, G. (2013). Spraying, fishing, looking for trouble: The Chinese internet and a critical perspective on the concept of trolling. Fibreculture, 22, 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• De Seta, G. (2018). Trolling and other problematic social media practices. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of social media (pp. 390–409). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dibbell, J. (1996). A rape in cyberspace: Or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier (pp. 375–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, S. (2015). Epistemic justice and democratic legitimacy. Hypatia, 30(4), 794–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, D. M. (2016). Doxing: A conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18, 199–210. doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9406-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichman, P., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2015). The bad boys and girls of cyberspace: How gender and context impact perception of and reaction to trolling. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichman, P., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2016). Online trolling and its perpetrators: Under the cyberbridge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. (2015). “The right to be forgotten”: a philosophical view. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik - Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 23(1), 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. (2011). On the epistemic cost of implicit bias. Philosophical Studies, 156(1), 33–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2012). Can an Algorithm by wrong? Limn, 2, Retrieved from http://limn.it/can-an-algorithm-be-wrong/
   Google Scholar
• Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. Information Society, 18, 371–384. doi: 10.1080/01972240290108186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgin, T. (2013). FCJ-159 /b/lack up: What trolls can teach us about race. The Fibreculture Journal, 22, 133–151. Retrieved from http://twentytwo.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-159-black-up-what-trolls-can-teach-us-about-race/
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N. (2015). Pax Technica: How the internet of things may set us free or lock us up. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16, 263–274. doi: 10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L. (1981). The baiting crowd in episodes of threatened suicide. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, E. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. (2016). Scaffolding, hard and soft: Infrastructures as critical and generative structures. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures, 3, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). FCJ-156 Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz. Fibreculture Journal, (22), Retrieved from http://twentytwo.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-156-hacking-the-social-internet-memes-identity-antagonism-and-the-logic-of-lulz/
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Origgi, G. (2012). Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2013a). Ethnography of trolling: workarounds, discipline-jumping & ethical pitfalls. Ethnography Matters. Retrieved from http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2013/01/08/ethnography-and-the-troll-space-workarounds-discipline-jumping-and-ethical-pitfalls-1-of-3/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2013b). Are internet trolls the modern incarnation of witch hunters? Billions and Billions. Retrieved from https://billions-and-billions.com/2013/08/08/are-internet-trolls-the-modern-incarnation-of-witch-hunters-my-interview-with-the-atlantic-wire/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., & Milner, R. (2017). The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfilippo, M. R., Yang, S., & Fichman, P. (2017). Managing online trolling: From deviant to social and political trolls. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii. AIS Electronic Library.
   Google Scholar
• Sclove, R. (2012). I’d hammer out freedom: Technology as politics and culture. In Society, ethics, and technology (5th ed, pp. 69–76). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2010). Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, 36, 357–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, B. (2015). There’s no (testimonial) justice: Why pursuit of a virtue is not the solution to epistemic injustice. Social Epistemology, 30(3), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2015.1031852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler, J. R., & Phillips, W. L. (1998). The bad boys of cyberspace: Deviant behavior in a multimedia chat community. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Oxford: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 2, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Whitwell, T. (2014). Inside Shenzhen: China’s Silicon Valley. The Guardian. London. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/jun/13/inside-shenzen-china-silicon-valley-tech-nirvana-pearl-river
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Fuller, G., & McCrea, C. (2013). Troll theory? The Fibreculture Journal, 22, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2016). Digital Connectivity Helping Drive Growth in East Asia Pacific, But Millions Are Left Offline. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/04/21/digital-connectivity-helping-drive-growth-in-east-asia-pacific-but-millions-are-left-offline
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum, & Boston Consulting Group. (2016). Internet for all: a framework for accelerating internet access and adoption. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Internet_for_All_Framework_Accelerating_Internet_Access_Adoption_report_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar