Smartphone-size screens constrain cognitive access to video news stories

References

• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., Schweda, A., & Varan, D. (2009). Viewing angle matters – screen type does not. Journal of Communication, 59(3), 609–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boase, J., & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P., & Bradley, S. D. (2004). Presidential Expressions and Viewer emotion: Counterempathic responses to Televised Leader displays. Social Science Information, 43(1), 59–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. (2010). Please add the following to the reference list: Evaluating Shared Access: social equality and the circulation of mobile phones in rural Uganda. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 15(2), 230–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, C. N., & Blanton, H. (2016). Real-world persuasion from virtual-world campaigns: How transportation into virtual worlds moderates in-game influence. Communication Research, 43(4), 542–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2007). Perceptions of mobile phone use in public settings: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behavior and Information Technology, 23(3), 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 76–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., & Roto, V. (2008). How people use the web on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 905–914). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Detenber, B., & Reeves, B. (1996). A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication, 46, 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detenber, B. H., Simons, R. F., & Bennett, G. G. (1998). Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J., Searles, K., Sui, M., & Paul, N. (2018). News attention in a mobile Era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23, 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., & Han, S. P. (2012). How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., & Kamhawi, R. (2006). Hard wired for negative news? Gender differences in processing broadcast news. Communication Research, 33(5), 346–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E, Lang, A, & Zhao, X. (2003). News content and form: Implications for memory and audience evaluations. Communication Research, 30(4), 387–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., Lang, A., Zhou, S., & Bolls, P. D. (2000). Cognitive access to negatively arousing news: An experimental investigation of the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 27(1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Capanella Bracken, C., & Ditton, T. B. (1999). The role of screen size in viewer experiences of media content. Visual Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruszczynski, M. W., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The Physiology of political participation. Political Behavior, 35(1), 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatada, T, Sakata, H, & Kusaka, H. (1980). Psychophysical analysis of the perception of reality induced by a visual wide field display. SMPTE Journal, 89, 560–569.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., & Lee, K. M. (2012). Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 617–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L., Von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2013). Evolving mobile media: Uses and conceptualizations of the mobile internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 491–507. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde-Clark, N, & TVan, Tonder. (2011). Revisiting the leapfrog debate in light of current trends of mobile phone usage in the greater Johannesburg area. South Africa. Journal of African Media Studies, 3(2), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaasinen, E., Roto, K., Roloff, K., Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Vainio, T., Maehr, W., … Shrestha, S. (2009). User experience of mobile Internet: Analysis and recommendations. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 1(4), 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Sundar, S. (2014). Does screen size matter for smartphones? Utilitarian and hedonic effects of screen size on smartphone adoption. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 466–473. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Sundar, S. (2015). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust? Human Communication Research, 42, 45–70. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., Sundar, S. S., & Park, E. (2011). The effects of screen-size and communication modality on psychology of mobile device users. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1207–1212). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kulta, H. P., & Karjaluoto, H. (2016, October). Conceptualizing engagement in the mobile context: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 169–176). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., & Yom-Tov, E. (2014). Measuring user engagement. Williston, VT: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(3), 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Newhagen, J., & Reeves, B. (1996). Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 460476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2016). “The faster you go, the more you know: How highspeed internet increases political knowledge, news consumption and reduces the knowledge gap.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Wu, F. G., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader. Displays, 34(1), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, D. (1995). Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space. Communication Research, 22, 288–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). JCMC321
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Grabe, M. E., & Reich, R. D. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10(1), 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Presence and television. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Marci, C. D. (2006). A biologically based measure of emotional engagement: Context matters. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux, L. (2017). Mobile News Consumption: A habit of snacking. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 634–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Franko, W. W. (2013). Digital cities: The internet and the geography of opportunity. NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D., Pemantle, R., & Pham, P. (2017). The Perils of balance testing in experimental Design: Messy analyses of Clean data. The American Statistician. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1322143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). The emerging mobile Internet underclass: A critique of mobile Internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J. E., & Bucy, E. (2004). Routes to media access. In J. E. Newhagen & E. Bucy (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological Dimensions of New technology Use (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, J., Purvis, S., & Hazlett, R. L. (2011). Which broadcast Medium better drives engagement?: Measuring the powers of radio and television with Electromyography and skin-conductance Measurements. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(4), 578–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Racial and Ethnic Differences in How People Use Mobile Technology. Accessed May 19, 2016, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/30/racial-and-ethnic-differences-in-how-people-use-mobile-technology/.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). News use across social media platforms. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post broadcast democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. M., Brumby, D. P., Cox, A. L., & Gould, S. J. (2016, September). Watching movies on netflix: investigating the effect of screen size on viewer immersion. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (pp. 714–721). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rúas-Araújo, J., Cuesta-Morales, P., & Vila-Sobrino, X. A. (2016). Study of political Campaign Ads from Ecuador Employing heart rate variability (HRV). In New Advances in information Systems and technologies, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 421–430). Cham: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-31307-8_44
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. F., Detenber, B. H., Roedema, T. M., & Reiss, J. E. (1999). Emotion processing in three systems: The medium and the message. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 619–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T., Larsen, J. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2016). Do women and men respond differently to negative news? Politics & Gender, 12(2), 344–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics and negativity. Political Communication, 32, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to Understanding technology effects on Credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S, Kang, J, & Oprean, D. (2017). Being There in the Midst of the Story: How Immersive Journalism Affects Our Perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 672–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussler, M., & Soroka, S. (2014). Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 360–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidmann, N. B., Benitez-Baleato, S., Hunziker, P., Glatz, E., & Dimitropolous, X. (2016). Digital Discrimination: Political bias in Internet service provision across ethnic groups. Science, 353(6304), 1151–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K., Bolls, P., & Lang, A. (1998). The effects of arousal on liking and believability of commercials. Journal of Marketing Communications, 4(2), 101–114.
   Google Scholar