Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook

References

• Ananny, M. (2016). Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 93–117. doi: 10.1177/0162243915606523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angwin, J., Varner, M., & Tobin, A. (2017, September 14). Facebook enabled advertisers to reach ‘Jew haters.’ Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-enabled-advertisers-to-reach-jew-haters
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BallotPedia. (2017). List of current mayors of the top 100 cities in the United States [Data file]. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_current_mayors_of_the_top_100_cities_in_the_United_States
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, S. C., LaBrie, J. W., Froidevaux, N. M., & Witkovic, Y. D. (2016). Different digital paths to the keg? How exposure to peers’ alcohol-related social media content influences drinking among male and female first-year college students. Addictive Behaviors, 57, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. doi: 10.1177/0263276411424420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We Are data. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli, M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W., & Scala, A. (2019). Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet. arXiv Preprint ArXiv:1903.00699, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K., Cho, J., & Rader, E. (2017). Explaining the News Feed algorithm: An analysis of the “News Feed FYI” blog. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1553–1560. Denver, Colorado, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• The Council of State Governments. (2016). The governors, 2016 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/4.1%202016.xls
   Google Scholar
• DeVito, M. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dylko, I., Dolgov, I., Hoffman, W., Eckhart, N., Molina, M., & Aaziz, O. (2017). The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Kumaran, S. R. K., Sandvig, C., & Karahalios, K. (2018). Communicating algorithmic process in online behavioral advertising. Montreal, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook Business. (n.d.). News feed publisher guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/publisher/newsfeedguidelines
   Google Scholar
• Facebook Help Center. (n.d.). What categories of my Facebook data are available to me? Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/930396167085762
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(Special Issue), 298–320. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M., & Murray, J. (2018). Datastructuring—organizing and curating digital traces into action. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951718799114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 265–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• GitHub. (2017). Congress-legislators. Retrieved from https://github.com/unitedstates/congress-legislators
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Munger, K., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2018). How accurate are survey responses on social media and politics? Political Communication, 36(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegeman, J., Ge, H., Gubin, M., & Amit, A. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 13/545,266. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, Y.-F., & Hua, M. (2012). U.S. Patent No. 2012/0166532A1. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Karnowski, V., Kümpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, T. A., Cohler, M. R., Zuckerberg, M. E., Juan, Y. F., Jin, R. K. X., Rosenstein, J. M., … Palihapitlya, C. M. (2009). U.S. Patent No. 12/193,705. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, T., & Zhou, D. (2010). Leveraging information in a social network for inferential targeting of advertisements. Facebook, Inc.; U.S. Patent Application No. 12/419,958.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (2016, December). Algorithmic Opportunity: Digital Advertising and Inequality in Political Involvement. In The Forum (Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 471-484). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., Kou, C., Bankston, L., Kim, S. Y., … Raskutti, G. (2018). The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication, 35(4), 515–541. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information Communication and Society, 20(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of political action: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68(4), 1041–1063. doi: 10.2307/2579133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2017). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. Presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lada, A., Li, J., & Ding, S. (2017, January 31). News Feed FYI: New signals to show you more authentic and timely stories. Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/01/news-feed-fyi-new-signals-to-show-you-more-authentic-and-timely-stories/
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18(1), 18–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). News media, knowledge, and political interest: Evidence of a dual role from a field experiment. Journal of Communication, 67, 545–564. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. (2015). The production of prediction: What does machine learning want? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 429–445. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, C., Finos, L., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., & Spada, M. M. (2017). Objective Facebook behaviour: Differences between problematic and non-problematic users. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 541–546. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, L. (2015, July 2). How The New York Times finds new subscribers on Facebook. Digiday. Retrieved from https://digiday.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mosseri, A. (2017, May 19). Improving the integrity of News Feed: Principles for publishers. Facebook Media. Retrieved from https://media.fb.com/2017/05/19/improving-the-integrity-of-news-feed-principles-for-publishers/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media+ Society, 3(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohme, J., Albaek, E., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Exposure research going mobile: A smartphone-based measurement of media exposure to political information in a convergent media environment. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2-3), 135–148. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open: States. (2017). States [Data file]. Retrieved from https://openstates.org/downloads/
   Google Scholar
• Palis, C. (2012, April 12). Facebook lets you download more of your data. Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/12/facebook-download-your-data_n_1420764.html
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaram, G., & Sanaratna, N. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 13/326.289. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaram, G., Wu, G., Yan, H., & Kanter, J. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 13/589,693. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2017). Scrutinizing an algorithmic technique: The Bayes classifier as interested reading of reality. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 100–117. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1181195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2017). The Economist’s machine-powered social. WARC. Retrieved from https://www.warc.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Goel, V. (2017, September 6). Fake Russian Facebook accounts bought $100,000 in political ads. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, C. (2017). Inside the partisan fight for your news feed. BuzzfeedNews. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/inside-the-partisan-fight-for-your-news-feed?utm_term=.yceQP3M0N#.vk5EbdZXy
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Opportunity structures for selective exposure: Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish election campaigns using panel survey data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 527–546. doi: 10.1177/1940161216658157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/eds018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–554. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1111/comt.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Xu, Y., & Edgerly, S. (2018). Political inequalities start at home: Parents, children, and the socialization of civic infrastructure online. Political Communication, 35(2), 178–195. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1333550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., … Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C., & Thorson, K. (2017). Combining big data and survey techniques to model effects of political content flows in Facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1177/0894439315609528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., & Moreels, P. (2012). Inferring user profile attributes from social information, Facebook, Inc.; U.S. Patent 8,856,235.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Skoric, M., & Shen, F. (2017). I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests. Political Communication, 34(1), 112–131. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar