Transmedia teens: the creative transmedia skills of Italian students

References

• Ardévol, E. (2012). Virtual/visual ethnography: Methodological crossroads at the intersection of visual and Internet research. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in visual methodology (pp. 74–93). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. E. (2011). Are we all produsers now? Convergence and Media Audience Practices. Cultural Studies, 25(4-5), 502–516.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., Castro, J. C., & Lin, C. (2015). Youth practices in digital arts and new media. Learning in formal and informal settings. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), (2010). A Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2015). Making sense of teen life: Strategies for capturing ethnographic data in a networked era. In E. Hargittai, & C. Sandvig (Eds.), Digital research confidential: The secrets of studying behavior online (pp. 79–102). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Hargittai, E. (2013). Connected and concerned: How parental concerns about online safety issues vary. Internet & Policy, 5(3), 245–269. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI332
   Google Scholar
• Brake, D. R. (2014). Are we all online content creators now? Web 2.0 and digital divides. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(3), 591–609. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. digital formation. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Buglass, S. L., Binder, J. F., Betts, L. R., & Underwood, J. D. M. (2017). Motivators of online vulnerability: The impact of social network site use and FOMO. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digcomp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. T., Wu, J., & Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (eds.). (1999). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. C., & Eynon, R. (2018). Is digital upskilling the next generation our ‘pipeline to prosperity’? New Media & Society, 20(11), 3961–3979. doi: 10.1177/1461444818783102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills Paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the Internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Pico, M., Masanet, M.-J., & Scolari, C. A. (2019). Towards a typology of young produsers: Teenagers’ transmedia skills, media production, and narrative and aesthetic appreciation. New Media & Society, 21(2), 336–353. doi: 10.1177/1461444818796470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui, M., Fasoli, M., & Carradore, R. (2017). “Digital well-being”. Developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, J., & Boffi, L. (2016). Design Interventions as a form of Inquiry. In R. Smith, K. Vangkilde, M. Kjærsgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, & T. Binder (Eds.), Designing anthropological futures (pp. 89–104). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Handwerker, W. P. (2001). Quick ethnography. Walnut Creek: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with New media: Summary of findings from the digital Youth project. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21stCentury/white paper. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2015). Participatory culture in a Networked Era. A conversation on Youth, learning, Commerce and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, P., & Ito, M. (2010). Creative production. In M. Ito, S. Baumer, M. Bittanti, d. boyd, R. Cody, B. Herr-Stephenson, & L. Tripp (Eds.), (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around and geeking out: Kids Living and learning with new media (pp. 243–293). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York: A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In M. Knobel, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Chen, D. T., Li, Y., & Lin, T. B. (2015). Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument. Computers & Education, 85, 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. (2015). Economic, social, and personal aspects of Educating for creativity: A study of a community-based Youth media Arts Program. In J. Black, J. C. Castro, & C. Lin (Eds.), Youth practices in digital arts and new media. Learning in formal and informal settings (pp. 19–33). NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2013). The participation paradigm in audience research. Communication Review, 16(1-2), 21–30. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2013.757174
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class. living and learning in the digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2009). The practice of everyday (media) life: From mass consumption to mass cultural production? Critical Inquiry, 50(9), 319–331. doi: 10.1086/596645
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2011). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, R. (2016). Social media in Southeast Italy. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.) (2010). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39-58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, S., Moura, P., Masanet, M. J., Taddeo, G., & Tirocchi, S. (2018). Media uses and production practices: Case study with teens from Portugal, Spain and Italy. Comunicación y Sociedad, 33, 89–114. doi: 10.32870/cys.v0i33.7091
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2014). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Ardévol, E. (2018). Ethnographic strategies for revealing teens’ transmedia skills and practices. In C. A. Scolari (Ed.), Teens, media and collaborative cultures. Exploiting teens’ transmedia skills in the classroom (pp. 108–117). Barcelona: H2020 TRANSLITERACY Research Project/Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. doi: 10.1002/symb.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production Gap: The digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide. Poetics, 39, 145–168. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolari, C. A. (2009). Transmedia storytelling: Implicit consumers narrative worlds and branding in contemporary media production. International Journal of Communication, 3, 586–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolari, C. A. (2013). Narrativas transmedia. Cuando todos los medios cuentan. Barcelona: Deusto.
   Google Scholar
• Scolari, C. A. (ed.). (2018a). Teens, media and collaborative cultures. Exploiting teens’ transmedia skills in the classroom. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2011). Creative digital cultures: Informal learning beyond the school. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international Handbook of creative learning (pp. 244–252). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. London: The Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16(3), 507–526. doi: 10.1177/1461444813487959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1177/0163443708098245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the Curriculum: School knowledge in the digital Age. Boston: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education. Unlocking the Potential of Technology. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
   Google Scholar