Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair

References

• Ananny, M. (2016). Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 93–117. doi: 10.1177/0162243915606523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. doi: 10.1177/1461444816676645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, G. (2018). Search engine art: Internet imperialism and the image in context. Presented at the EVA London 2018, UK, London: Proceedings of EVA London 2018, UK. Retrieved from https://ewic.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_eva18_de_paper1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balsamo, A. M. (2011). Designing culture: The technological imagination at work. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002. doi: 10.1177/1461444809336551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodo, B., Helberger, N., Irion, K., Zuiderveen Borgesius, K., Moller, J., van de Velde, B., … de Vreese, C. (2018). Tackling the algorithmic control crisis -the technical, legal, and ethical challenges of research into algorithmic agents. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 19(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjolt/vol19/iss1/3
   Google Scholar
• Bräuchler, B., & Postill, J. (Eds.). (2010). Theorising media and practice. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. doi: 10.1177/1461444812440159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2016). Neither black nor box: Ways of knowing algorithms. In S. Kubitschko & A. Kaun (Eds.), Innovative methods in media and communication research (pp. 81–98). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. d. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., & Jajodia, S. (2010). Who is tweeting on Twitter: Human, bot, or cyborg? Proceedings of the 26th annual computer security applications conference (pp. 21–30). New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. (2018). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 146144481881568. doi: 10.1177/1461444818815684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132. doi: 10.1080/1035033042000238295
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2012). Media as practice. In Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice (pp. 33–58). London: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, N. (2019). The identity trade: Selling privacy and reputation online. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., & Johansson, A. (2017). “Keep smiling!”: Time, functionality and intimacy in spotify’s featured playlists. Cultural Analysis, 16(1), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., Vaccaro, K., Rickman, A., Hamilton, K., & Kirlik, A. (2016). First I “like” it, then I hide it: Folk theories of social feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ‘16 (pp. 2371–2382). Santa Clara, CA: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858494
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A., & Hannay, A. (Eds.). (1995). Technology and the politics of knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R. W. (2015). The case for alternative social media. Social Media + Society, doi: 10.1177/2056305115604338
   Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. doi: 10.1177/1461444812472322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2017). Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 63–80. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1199721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1–25. doi: 10.1177/0263276407075954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J. (2014). Rethinking repair. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies : Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 221–240). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karakayali, N., Kostem, B., & Galip, I. (2018). Recommendation systems as technologies of the self: Algorithmic control and the formation of music taste. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(2), 3–24. doi: 10.1177/0263276417722391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubitschko, S. (2017). Acting on media technologies and infrastructures: Expanding the media as practice approach. Media, Culture & Society, 16344371770606. doi: 10.1177/0163443717706068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, G. (2013). Participatory culture and the new governance of communication: The paradox of participatory media. Television & New Media, 14(2), 91–105. doi: 10.1177/1527476411433519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55–78. doi: 10.1177/0263276407075956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig, C., & Nardi, B. (2015). Algorithmic authority: The case of Bitcoin (pp. 743–752). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.95
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. (2006). Cutting code: Software and sociality. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meinking, S. (2015). World White Web is out to make the internet a bit less white. Retrieved from http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/24828/1/world-white-web-is-out-to-make-the-internet-a-bit-less-white
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 446–463. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340–360. doi: 10.1111/comt.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. (1993). A small matter of programming: Perspectives on end user computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, Daniel. (2015). On Organizing Algorithms. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 119–132. doi: 10.1177/0263276414530477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018). Aestheticizing Google critique: A 20-year retrospective. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 205395171876862. doi: 10.1177/2053951718768626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, N., & Zehle, S. (2015). The aesthetics of algorithmic experience. In R. Martin (Ed.), The Routledge companion to art and politics (pp. 214–221). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C. (2016). When the algorithm itself is a racist: Diagnosing ethical harm in the basic components of software (Vol. 10). International Journal of Communications. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6182/1807
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver, N. (2014). Knowing algorithms. In Media in transition 8. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://nick-seaver.squarespace.com/s/seaverMiT8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44–74). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, O. (2016). How a designer took on Google over the ‘World White Web’. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/36044177/how-a-designer-took-on-google-over-the-world-white-web#.tikw6ox5VN
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2005). Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. In N. Thrift (Ed.), Knowing capitalism (pp. 212–226). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E., Jeppesen, S., & Mattoni, A. (2017). Comparing digital protest media imaginaries: Anti-austerity movements in Spain, Italy & Greece. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 404–422. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1999). Do artifacts have politics? In D. A. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (2nd ed., pp. 28–40). Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 58–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
   Google Scholar
• Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1177/0162243915608948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar