References
- Aizenberg, E., & Hanegraaff, M. (2020). Time is of the essence: A longitudinal study on business presence in political news in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219882814
- Andrews, K., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386689
- Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
- Beckers, K., & Harder, R. (2016). Twitter just exploded. Social media as alternative vox pop. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 910–920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1161493.
- Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
- Berkhout, J., Beyers, J., Braun, C., Hanegraaff, M., & Lowery, D. (2018). Making inference across mobilisation and influence research: Comparing top-down and bottom-up mapping of interest systems. Political Studies, 66(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717702400
- Binderkrantz, A. S. (2005). Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.x
- Binderkrantz, A. S. (2012). Interest groups in the media: Bias and diversity over time. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01997.x
- Binderkrantz, A. S., Chaqués Bonafont, L., & Halpin, D. R. (2017). Diversity in the news? A study of interest groups in the media in the UK, Spain and Denmark. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000599
- Binderkrantz, A. S., & Christiansen, P. M. (2014). Making it to the news. Interest groups in the Danish media. In F. Oehmer (Ed.), Politische Interessenvermittlunk und Medien (pp. 201–219). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
- Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance, 28(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089
- Binderkrantz, A. S., & Pedersen, H. H. (2019). The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK. Acta Politica, 54(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7
- Binderkrantz, A. S., Pedersen, H. H., & Beyers, J. (2017). What is access? A discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access. European Political Science, 16(3), 306–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.17
- Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social media as beat. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
- Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
- Chalmers, A., & Shotton, P. (2016). Changing the face of advocacy? Explaining interest organizations’ use of social media strategies. Political Communication, 33(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1043477
- Christiansen, P. M. (2012). Interest group dynamics and representation in Denmark. In D. Halpin, & G. Jordan (Eds.), The scale of interest organization in democratic politics. Data and research methods (pp. 161–179). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cobb, R., Ross, J. K., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400264034
- Conway, B. A., & Kensk, K. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
- Danielian, L. H., & Page, B. I. (1994). The heavenly chorus: Interest group voices on TV news. American Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 1056–1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2111732
- De Bruycker, I. (2019). Blessing or curse for advocacy? How news media attention helps advocacy groups to achieve their policy goals. Political Communication, 36(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493007
- De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2015). Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media. Political Communication, 32(3), 453–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.958259
- Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2016). Insiders versus outsiders. Interest group politics in multilevel Europe. Oxford University Press.
- Eurostat. (2020). Digital economy and society database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society/data/database
- Eyal, H. (2016). Digital fit as a leg-up for nongovernmental organizations’ media and political success. Political Communication, 33(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1011294
- Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative media and social networking sites: The politics of individuation and political participation. The Communication Review, 14(3), 179–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597245
- Gandy, O. H., Jr.. (1982). Beyond agenda-setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Ablex.
- Gibson, R., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107
- Grömping, M. (2019). More bang for the buck: Media freedom and organizational strategies in the agenda-setting of human rights groups. Political Communication, 36(3), 452–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1551256
- Harder, R. A., Paulussen, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). Making sense of Twitter buzz. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 933–943. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1160790
- Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2016). The unheavenly chorus: Political voices of organized interests on social media. Policy & Internet, 8(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.110
- Johansson, H., Scaramuzzino, R., & Wennerhag, M. (2019). Social movements and interest groups compared: How organisational type matters for explaining Swedish organisations’ advocacy strategies. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(2), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i2p353.
- Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
- Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton University Press.
- Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412
- Lewis, J., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2008). A compromised fourth estate? Journalism Studies, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701767974
- Lowery, D., Baumgartner, F. R., Berkhout, J., Berry, J. M., Halpin, D., Hojnacki, M., & Schlozman, K. L. (2015). Images of an unbiased interest system. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1212–1231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1049197
- Lyons, B., McKay, A., & Refiler, J. (2019). High-status lobbyists are most likely to overrate their success. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0761-9
- Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Wolfe, J. (1999). Party competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain. International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(4), 24–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X9900400403
- Metag, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). Journalists’ use of political tweets. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1155–1172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1248989
- Nelimarkka, M., Laaksonen, S. M., Marttila, M., Kekkonen, A., Tuokko, M., & Villi, M. (2016). Influencing the news through social media: Online agenda building and normalization during a pre-electoral campaign. Paper at ICA 2016, Fukuoka, Japan.
- Neuman, W., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S., & Bae, S. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088
- Oehmer, F. (2017). It’s the communication that matters, too! Determinants of interest groups’ media exposure in German newspapers. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-017-0027-8
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
- Pamerlee, J. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955
- Paulussen, S., & Harder, R. A. (2014). Social media references in newspapers. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327
- Powers, M. (2016). NGO publicity and reinforcing path dependencies: Explaining the persistence of media-centered publicity strategies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 490–507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216658373
- Scaramuzzino, G., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2017). The weapon of a new generation?—Swedish civil society organizations use of social media to influence politics. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1276501.
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. A realist’s view of democracy in America. Reprint. Wadsworth. 1975.
- Stier, S., Schünemann, W., & Steiger, S. (2018). Of activists and gatekeepers: Temporal and structural properties of policy networks on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1910–1930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817709282.
- Thrall, A. T. (2006). The myth of the outside strategy: Mass media news coverage of interest groups. Political Communication, 23(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600976989.
- Thrall, A. T., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May we have your attention please? Human-rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213519132
- Van Aelst, P., van Erkel, P., D’heer, E., & Harder, R. A. (2017). Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 715–732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203973
- van der Graaf, A., Otjes, S., & Rasmussen, A. (2016). Weapon of the weak? The social media landscape of interest groups. European Journal of Communication, 31(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115612210
- Vesa, J. (in press). Interest Groups and the News Media. In P. Harris, A. Bitonti, C. S. Fleisher, & A. S. Binderkrantz (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_46-1.
- Vesa, J., Kantola, A., & Binderkrantz, A. S. (2018). A Stronghold of Routine Corporatism? The Involvement of Interest Groups in Policy Making in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(4), 239–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12128.
- Vromen, A., & Coleman, W. (2013). Online campaigning organizations and storytelling strategies: GetUp! in Australia. Policy and Internet, 5(1), 76–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.23
- Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
- Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in U.S. Journalism: How do journalists think about social media? Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844–855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162