References
- Alasuutari, P., Qadir, A., & Creutz, K. (2013). The domestication of foreign news: News stories related to the 2011 Egyptian revolution in British, Finnish and Pakistani newspapers. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 692–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713491299
- Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492
- Belt, T. L. (2018). Can we at least all laugh together now? Twitter and online political humor during the 2016 election. In C. J. Galdieri, J. C. Lucas, & T. S. Sisco (Eds.), The role of Twitter in the 2016 US election (pp. 97–117). Palgrave Pivot.
- Boxman-Shabtai, L., & Shifman, L. (2015). When ethnic humor goes digital. New Media & Society, 17(4), 520–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813506972
- Caufield, R. P. (2008). The influence of “infoenterpropagainment”: Exploring the power of political satire as a distinct form of political humor. In J. C. Baumgartner & J. S. Morris (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 3–20). Routledge.
- Clausen, L. (2004). Localizing the global: ‘Domestication’ processes in international news production. Media, Culture & Society, 26(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704038203
- Ellis, B. (2002). Making a big apple crumble: The role of humor in constructing a global response to disaster. New Directions in Folklore, 6. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ndif/article/view/19883
- Fang, K. (2020). Turning a communist party leader into an internet meme: The political and apolitical aspects of China’s toad worship culture. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485722
- Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E. (2009). The state of satire, the satire of state. In J. Gray, J. P. Jones, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era (pp. 3–36). NYU Press.
- Hariman, R. (2008). Political parody and public culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802210369
- Hart, R. P., & Hartelius, E. J. (2007). The political sins of Jon Stewart. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701520991
- Heikkilä, N. (2017). Online antagonism of the alt-right in the 2016 election. European Journal of American Studies, 12(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.12140
- Herring, G. C. (2017). The American century and beyond: US foreign relations, 1893-2015 (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Polity Press.
- Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
- Holbert, R. L., Tchernev, J. M., Walther, W. O., Esralew, S. E., & Benski, K. (2013). Young voter perceptions of political satire as persuasion: A focus on perceived influence, persuasive intent, and message strength. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.787075
- Julin, G. (2018). Satire in a multi-cultural world: A Bakhtinian analysis. Comedy Studies, 9(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2040610X.2018.1494357
- Katz, Y., & Shifman, L. (2017). Making sense? The structure and meanings of digital memetic nonsense. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 825–842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291702
- Kuipers, G. (2005). “Where was King Kong when we needed him?” Public discourse, digital disaster jokes, and the functions of laughter after 9/11. The Journal of American Culture, 28(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-734X.2005.00155.x
- Kuipers, G. (2008). The sociology of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humor research (pp. 361–398). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x
- Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (2016). How the world changed social media. UCL Press.
- Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press.
- Mocanu, D., Baronchelli, A., Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Zhang, Q., & Vespignani, A. (2013). The Twitter of Babel: Mapping world languages through microblogging platforms. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e61981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061981
- Moody-Ramirez, M., & Church, A. B. (2019). Analysis of Facebook meme groups used during the 2016 us presidential election. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808799
- Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2018). Meme templates as expressive repertoires in a globalizing world: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 294–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy016
- Niven, D., Lichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(3), 118–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X03008003007
- Oring, E. (2003). Engaging humor. University of Illinois Press.
- Pew Research Center. (2016). A divided and pessimistic electorate [report]. http://www.people-press.org/2016/11/10/a-divided-and-pessimistic-electorate/
- Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. M. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 1–25). Sage.
- Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
- Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2017). Internet memes as polyvocal political participation. In D. Schill & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), The presidency and social media: Discourse, disruption, and digital democracy in the 2016 presidential election (pp. 285–308). Routledge.
- Ruigrok, N., & Van Atteveldt, W. (2007). Global angling with a local angle: How U.S., British, and Dutch newspapers frame global and local terrorist attacks. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06297436
- Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
- Shifman, L., Levy, H., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Internet jokes: The secret agents of globalization? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 727–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12082
- Sloan, L., & Morgan, J. (2015). Who tweets with their location? Understanding the relationship between demographic characteristics and the use of geoservices and geotagging on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142209
- Spangler, P. T., Liu, J., & Hill, C. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research for simple qualitative data: An introduction to CQR-M. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 269–283). American Psychological Association.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
- Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711
- Wu, S., & Mai, B. (2019). Talking about and beyond censorship: Mapping topic clusters in the Chinese Twitter sphere. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5057–5079.
- Young, D. G. (2020). Irony and outrage: The polarized landscape of rage, fear, and laughter in the United States. Oxford University Press.
- Zidani, S. (2018). Represented dreams: Subversive expressions in Chinese social media as alternative symbolic infrastructures. Social Media + Society, 4(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118809512