References
- Azer, S. A., Grain, H. A., Khelaif, R. A., & Eshaiwi, S. M. (2013). Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11), e241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2728
- Bakar, S., Aminullah, R., Sahidol, J. N. M., Harun, N. I., & Razali, A. (2019). Using YouTube to encourage English learning. In E. S. L. classrooms, M. Y. Mohamad Noor, B. E. Ahmad, M. R. Ismail, H. Hashim, & M. A. Abdullah Baharum (Eds.), Proceedings of the regional conference on science, technology and social sciences (RCSTSS 2016) (pp. 415–419). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0203-9_38
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
- Bétrancourt, M., & Benetos, K. (2018). Why and when does instructional video facilitate learning? A commentary to the special issue “developments and trends in learning with instructional video”. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 471–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.035
- Beukeboom, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & de Vries, M. (2015). Does a virtual like cause actual liking? How following a brand’s Facebook updates enhances brand evaluations and purchase intention. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 32, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.09.003
- Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.004
- De Koning, B. B., Hoogerheide, V., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2018). Developments and trends in learning with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 395–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.055
- Dias da Silva, M. A., Pereira, A. C., & Walmsley, A. D. (2019). Who is providing dental education content via YouTube? British Dental Journal, 226(6), 437–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0046-8
- Dijkmans, C., Kerkhof, P., Buyukcan-Tetik, A., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015). Online conversation and corporate reputation: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of exposure to the social media activities of a highly interactive company. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(6), 632–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12132
- Ebbers, S. J. (2007). The impact of social model agent type (coping, mastery) and social interaction type (vicarious, direct) on learner motivation, attitudes, social comparisons, affect, and learning performance [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA]. DigiNole: Florida State University digital repository.
- Gruffat, C. (2015). Tutorials on YouTube. A study from the perspective of digital humanities. Social Media Studies, 1(2), 143–149. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/06ba/d29f081e73a6feab859cf5e945eddcdde2bb.pdf
- Hautz, J., Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Thürridl, C. (2014). Let users generate your video ads? The impact of video source and quality on consumers’ perceptions and intended behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.06.003
- Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learning and Instruction, 44, 22–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.004
- Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., van Nassau, H., & van Gog, T. (2018). Model-observer similarity and task-appropriateness in learning from video modeling examples: Do model and student gender affect test performance, self-efficacy, and perceived competence? Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 457–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.012
- Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005.
- Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x
- Lange, P. G. (2019). Informal learning on YouTube. In R. Hobbs, & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–11). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0090
- Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education, 61, 193–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
- Liao, Y.-W., Huang, Y.-M., Chen, H.-C., & Huang, S.-H. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 313–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.028
- Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
- Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201–212). Cambridge University Press.
- Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389
- Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker’s voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 419–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.419
- McCroskey, L., McCroskey, J., & Richmond, V. (2006). Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Communication Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270322
- Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.03.004.
- Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.002
- Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02
- Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
- Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., & Reisslein, M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers and Education, 67, 36–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.006
- Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., & Schenker, N. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance? Journal of Insect Science, 3(34), 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1673/031.003.3401
- Pires, F., Masanet, M.-J., & Scolari, C. A. (2019). What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766
- Pogue, L. L., & Ahyun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600748623
- Popular Mechanics. (2017). The very best DIY videos. https://www.popularmechanics.com/home/outdoor-projects/a27901/best-youtube-instructional-videos/
- Purcariu, M. (2019). The how-to video: An exploratory study on a popular user-generated genre. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 12(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24193/jmr.33.4.
- Riboni, G. (2017). Between professionalism and amateurship: Makeup discourse on YouTube. Lingue Culture Mediazioni-Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal), 4(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2017-001-ribo
- Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057002149
- Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01320134
- Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
- Smith, A., Toor, S., & van Kessel, P. (2018). Many turn to YouTube for children’s content, news, How-To lessons. Rew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/
- Statista. (2019). Most popular YouTube beauty and style channels as of April 2019, ranked by number of subscribers. https://www.statista.com/statistics/627448/most-popular-youtube-beauty-channels-ranked-by-subscribers/
- Sutherland, S., & Jalali, A. (2017). Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: Current perspectives. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 369–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S112594
- van Noort, G., & Willemsen, L. M. (2012). Online damage control: The effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.07.001
- van Wermeskerken, M., Ravensbergen, S., & van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 430–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.038
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2013.03.003
- Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., & Bronner, F. (2012). The ironic effect of source identification on the perceived credibility of online product reviewers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01598.x
- Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.341
- Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3/4), 122–135.