Governing with conversation culture – conditioning organizational interaction in a digital social movement

References

• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410376256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashuri, T., & Bar-Ilan, Y. (2016). How flat organizations filter: Organizational gatekeeping in a networked environment. Information Communication and Society, 19(10), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1111402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., & Cornelissen, J. (2011). Bridging corporate and organizational communication. Review, development and a look to the future. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 383–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910390194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy. The many faces of Anonymous. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2016). Masses, crowds, communities, movements: Collective action in the internet age. Social Movement Studies, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1055722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., Stohl, C., & Bimber, B. (2006). Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600557099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C. (2021). Fluid hybridity: Organizational form and formlessness in the digital age. In L. A. Lievrouw & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Routledge handbook of digital media and communication in society (pp. 268–280). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, C. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613479232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, T., & Bakken, T. (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1511–1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603249007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. G, Felin, T., & Whetten, D. A. (2010). Finding the Organization in Organizational Theory: A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D. (2008). Social movements and new media. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00145.x
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K., & Feldman, M. (2008). Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19(6), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer, & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes (pp. 172–192). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 7(C), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2005). The concept of autopoiesis. In D. Seidl, & K. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 54–63). Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2006). System as difference. Organization, 13(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2018). Organization and decision. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information Communication and Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles, D., Benoit-Barné, C., & Millerand, F. (2020). ‘Not your personal army!’ Investigating the organizing property of retributive vigilantism in a Reddit collective of websleuths. Information Communication and Society, 23(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1502336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niitamo, A., & Sjöblom, J. (2018). Verkkokeskustelut kommunikatiivista suunnittelua edistämässä. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu, 56(2).
   Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., & Zack, L. (2016). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckenstein, M., & Turunen, L. (2019). Re-humanizing the platform: Content moderators and the logic of care. New Media and Society, 22(6), 1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819875990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D. (2011). Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911405622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D., & Dobusch, L. (2019). Alternating between partial and complete organization: The case of anonymous. In G. Ahrne, & N. Brunsson (Eds.), Organization outside organizations (pp. 318–333). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D., Kuhn, T., & Kärreman, D. (2019). The communicative constitution of organization, organizing, and organizationality. Organization Studies, 40(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2005a). The basic concepts of Luhmann’s theory of social systems. In D. Seidl, & K. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 21–53). Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2005b). Organization and interaction. In D. Seidl, & K. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 145–170). Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J., & García-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. (2018). Social media and informal organisation of citizen activism. Social Media and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117751384.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication theory: An underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240
   Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, E., & Kisselburgh, L. (2015). Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies, 36(5), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar