Context, class, and community: a methodological framework for studying labor organizing and digital unionizing

References

• Allen, R. (1974). Reluctant reformers. Howard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R., & Fairbrother, P. (2008). The politics of union-government relations: Public transport in two Australian states. Work Organisation, Labor & Globalisation, 2(2), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.2.2.0056
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W. (2014). Response to Sidney Tarrow’s review of the logic of connective action. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, Eric. (2020). Breaking the law: Strike bans and labor revitalization in the red state revolt. Labor Studies Journal, 45(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X20901632
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Union members summary. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro, B. (2018). Trade unions and Facebook. ETUI Research Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C., Clegg, S., Hogan, J., & Kornberger, M. (2003). The polyphonic spree: The case of the Liverpool Dockers. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2338.00276
   Google Scholar
• Chaison, G. (2002). Information technology: The threat to unions. Journal of Labor Research, 23(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-002-1005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, C., & Cook, K. S. (2004). The emergence of trust networks. In Trust and community on the Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. (2013). Klansville, U.S.A: The rise and fall of the civil rights-era Ku Klux Klan. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D., Nugent, C., & Slodden, C. (2010). The durability of collective memory: Reconciling the “Greensboro Massacre”. Social Forces, 88(4), 1517–1542. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L. (2020). How artifacts afford: The power and politics of everyday things. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, W. J., & Freeman, R. B. (2002). Will unionism prosper in cyberspace? The promise of the internet for employee organization British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2004). Networks and participation. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), (pp. 339–359). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2017). Routing around organizations: Self-directed political consumption*. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-2-131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., McKee Hurwitz, H., Mejia Mesinas, A., Tolan, M., & Arlotti, A. (2013). This protest will be tweeted. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimhjellen, I., Wollebæk, D., & Strømsnes, K. (2013). Associations online: Barriers for using web-based communication in Voluntary Associations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(3), 730–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9361-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000414250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative media and social networking sites: The politics of individuation and political participation. The Communication Review, 14(3), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597245
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. B., & Rehavi, M. M. (2008). Helping workers online and offline. nber.org.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, R., Zagenczyk, T., & Masters, M. (2013). The face(book) of unionism. International Journal of E-Politics, 4(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2013100101
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M., & Hjorth, I. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
   Google Scholar
• Greene, A. M., & Kirton, G. (2003). Possibilities for remote participation in trade unions: Mobilising women activists. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2338.00278
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L., & Korstad, R. (1995). Class as race and gender: Making and Breaking a Labor Union in the Jim Crow South. Social Science History, 19, 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation. European Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Jennrich, K. (2016). The online participation divide. In M. Lloyd, & L. A. Friedland (Eds.), The communication crisis in America (pp. 199–213). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). The moveon effect. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, A., & Waddington, J. (2014). E-communications: An aspect of union renewal or merely doing things electronically?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(4), 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2016). Political turbulence. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCartin, J. A. (2008). “A Wagner Act for public employees”: Labor’s deferred dream and the rise of conservatism, 1970-1976. Journal of American History, 95(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/25095467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, M. K. (2011). Interest group activism on the web: The case of environmental organizations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.508003
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457–1492. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015, July–December). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theor. Social Media+Society 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177//2056305115603385
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rego, R., Marques Alves, P., Naumann, R., & Silva, J. (2014). A typology of trade union websites with evidence from Portugal and Britain. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113516405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, D. R., & Esch, E. D. (2012). The production of difference. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J. (2014). What unions no longer do. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, E. (2020). Digitizing freelance media labor: A class of workers negotiates entrepreneurialism and activism. New Media and Society, 22(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819861958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmand, J. A. (1995). The story of the Loray Mill strike. UNC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scaramuzzino, G., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2020). Membership in the digital era: Swedish Trade Unions’ use of internet and social media. Sociologisk Forskning, 57(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.57.20171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., Müller, A., Ramos-Vielba, I., & Thörnquist, A. (2018). Austerity and public sector trade union power. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680118771120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2015). Political ideology, social media, and labor unions. International Journal of Communication, 9(1).
   Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and Costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn't: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2020). The great equalizer reproduces inequality: How the digital divide is a class power divide. Political Power and Social Theory, 37, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920200000037005
   Google Scholar
• Scopes, K. (1992). Understanding the new labor movements in the “third world”: The emergence of social movement unionism. Critical Sociology, 19(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/089692059201900204
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shostack, A. B. (1999). Cyberunion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slovicl, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2013, April 25). Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Research Internet Project.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornthwaite, L., Balnave, N., & Barnes, A. (2018). Unions and social media: Prospects for gender inclusion. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L., & Hurd, R. W. (2001). Building social movement unionism. In L. Turner, H. C. Katz, & R. W. Hurd (Eds.), Rekindling the movement (pp. 9–26). ILR Press, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Upchurch, M., & Grassman, R. (2016). Striking with social media. Organization, 23(5), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415598248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasi, I. B., & Suh, C. S. (2016). Online activities, spatial proximity, and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street movement in the United States*. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-2-139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K., & Sherman, R. (2000). Breaking the iron law of Oligarchy: Union revitalization in the American labor movement. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 303–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/316963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. (2009). Understanding class. New Left Review, 60, 101–116.
   Google Scholar