Beyond algorithmic control: flexibility, intermediaries, and paradox in the on-demand economy

References

• Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldoz, R., Koeber, C., & Kraft, P. (2001). The critical study of work: Labor, technology, and global production. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, C. (2002). Work in the new economy: Flexible labor markets in Silicon Valley. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowsky, R. W. (2013). When you just cannot get away. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.772650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. (2019, May 12). Uber and Lyft face hurdle of finding and keeping drivers. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/uber-and-lyft-face-tough-test-of-finding-and-keeping-drivers-11557673863
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1978). Toward a Marxist theory of the labor process: Braverman and beyond. Politics & Society, 8(3–4), 247–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927800800301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under. Monopoly capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1983). Between the labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. J. (2018). Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2691–2711. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817729149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. J., & Qiu, J. L. (2019). Digital utility: Datafication, regulation, labor, and DiDi’s platformization of urban transport in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1614964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Y., & Sun, P. (2020). Temporal arbitrage, fragmented rush, and opportunistic behaviors: The labor politics of time in the platform economy. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1561–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de León, R. (2019, August 5). Chinese rideshare giant Didi Chuxing makes big move in driverless car race. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/chinese-rideshare-giant-didi-makes-big-move-in-driverless-car-race.html
   Google Scholar
• Didi Chuxing. (n.d.). Become a Didi Driver. https://www.didiglobal.com/contact/recruit
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (1999). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 237802311987004. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041
   Google Scholar
• Huws, U. (2019). Labor in contemporary capitalism: What next? Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1984). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. The Sociological Review, 32(S1), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Levy, K. E. C. (2015). The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. The Information Society, 31(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.998105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2014). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Dover Publications. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (1998). The business of contingent work: Growth and restructuring in Chicago’s temporary employment industry. Work, Employment and Society, 12(4), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017098124004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riain, S. O. (2001). Net-working for a living: Irish software developers in the global workplace. In R. Baldoz, C. Koeber, & P. Kraft (Eds.), Critical study of work (pp. 258–283). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2020). Platforms, markets, and contingent calculation: The flexible arrangement of the delivered meal. Antipode, 52(3), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, A. C., Malhotra, S., & Pérez, K. (2013). Answer the call: Virtual migration in Indian call centers. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlobach, M., & Retzer, S. (2018, August 13). Didi chuxing – how China’s ride-hailing leader aims to transform the future of mobility – sustainable transport in China. Sustainable Transport in China. https://www.sustainabletransport.org/archives/6317
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (2018). Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2954–2971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817738236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (2020). Dynamic exploits: Calculative asymmetries in the on-demand economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2019, January 30). Give way uber, Didi signals its ambitions and they encompass wheels on every continent. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2019/01/30/give-way-uber-didi-signals-its-ambitions-and-they-encompass-wheels-on-every-continent/#3b5020dd350f
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2006). The double indeterminacy of labour power: Labor effort and labor mobility. Work, Employment and Society, 20(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006065109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2015). Continuity and change in labor process analysis forty years after labor and monopoly capital. Labor Studies Journal, 40(3), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X15607154
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Thompson, P. (2016). Re-evaluating the labour process debate. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 19(4), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X98194002
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, J. (2017). The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617724303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P. (2019). Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2003). Fantasy island: A labour process critique of the ‘age of surveillance’. Surveillance & Society, 1(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i2.3350
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N. (2020). At what price? Labour politics and calculative power struggles in on-demand food delivery. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 14(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0136
   Google Scholar
• Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J. (1993). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. University of John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Ong, A. (2008). Privatizing China. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. J. (2019). Digital China’s informal circuits: Platforms, labor and governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar