References
- Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), no. REGULATION (EU) 2016/679, EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, COUNCIL (2016).
- Aldighieri, R. (2018). GDPR: A consumer perspective 2018. acxiom. https://dma.org.uk/uploads/misc/5af5497c03984-gdpr-consumer-perspective-2018-v1_5af5497c038ea.pdf
- Allen, D. W. E., Berg, A., Berg, C., Markey-Towler, B., & Potts, J. (2018). Some economic consequences of the GDPR. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160404
- Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
- Anthony, D., Campos-Castillo, C., & Horne, C. (2017). Toward a sociology of privacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053643
- Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745
- Baker, L. (2017). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on the banking sector: Data subjects’ rights, conflicts of laws and Brexit. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 1(2), 137–145.
- Barnard-Wills, D., Pauner Chulvi, C., & De Hert, P. (2016). Data protection authority perspectives on the impact of data protection reform on cooperation in the EU. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.006
- Bashir, M., Hayes, C., Lambert, A. D., & Kesan, J. P. (2015). Online privacy and informed consent: The dilemma of information asymmetry. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010043
- Bauer, P. C. (2015). Negative experiences and trust: A causal analysis of the effects of victimization on generalized trust. European Sociological Review, 31(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu096
- Bauer, P. C. (forthcoming). Conceptualizing trust and trustworthiness. In R. Barradas De Freitas & S. Lo Iacono (Eds.), Trust matters: Cross-disciplinary essays (pp. 1–16). Hardt Publishing.
- Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K., & Venetz, A. (2017). Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? Political Behavior, 39(3), 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2
- Bauer, P. C., & Freitag, M. (2018). Measuring trust. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 1–27). Oxford University Press.
- Bauer, P. C., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2019). Trust and cooperative behavior: Evidence from the realm of data-sharing. PLoS ONE, 14(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220115
- Bieker, F., Friedewald, M., Hansen, M., Obersteller, H., & Rost, M. (2016). A process for data protection impact assessment under the European general data protection regulation. Privacy Technologies and Policy, 9857, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44760-5_2
- Binns, R. (2017). Data protection impact assessments: A meta-regulatory approach. International Data Privacy Law, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw027
- Brayne, S. (2017). Big data surveillance: The case of policing. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865
- Büchi, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Velidi, S., & Viljoen, S. (2020). The chilling effects of algorithmic profiling: Mapping the issues. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105367
- Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality And Society, 7(3), 255–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463195007003003
- Buskens, V., Raub, W., & van der Veer, J. (2010). Trust in triads: An experimental study. Social Networks, 32(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.05.001
- Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
- Campos-Castillo, C., & Anthony, D. (2019). Situated trust in a physician: Patient health characteristics and trust in physician confidentiality. The Sociological Quarterly, 60(4), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2018.1547174
- Ciriani, S. (2015). The economic impact of the European reform of data protection. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2674010
- Citron, D. K., & Gray, D. (2013). Addressing the harm of total surveillance: A reply to professor Neil Richards. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 262–274.
- Cohen, J. E. (2012). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1904–1933. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hlr126&i=1934
- Croissant, Y., & Millo, G. (2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02
- de Montjoye, Y.-A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01376
- The Economist. (2018). America should borrow from Europe’s data-privacy law. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/04/05/america-should-borrow-from-europes-data-privacy-law
- European Commission. (2015). Special eurobarometer 431 “data protection”/ Wave EB83.1. https://doi.org/10.2838/552336
- European Commission. (2019a). Data protection rules as a trust-enabler in the EU and beyond – taking stock. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/aid_development_cooperation_fundamental_rights/aid_and_development_by_topic/documents/communication_2019374_final.pdf
- European Commission. (2019b, October 18). EU data protection rules. https://ec.europa.eu/info/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules/eu-data-protection-rules_en
- Faitelson, Y. (2017, December 4). Yes, the GDPR will affect your U.S.-based business. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/12/04/yes-the-gdpr-will-affect-your-u-s-based-business/
- Feiner, L. (2019, April 24). Facebook says the FTC privacy inquiry could cost as much as $5 billion. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/24/facebook-estimates-up-to-5-billion-loss-in-ftc-privacy-inquiry.html
- Freudiger, J., Shokri, R., & Hubaux, J.-P. (2012). Evaluating the privacy risk of location-based services. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 7035, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27576-0_3
- Glanville, B. (2018, March 1). 72% of Brits haven’t heard about GDPR. YouGov. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2018/03/01/72-brits-havent-heard-about-gdpr
- Goddard, M. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): European regulation that has a global impact. International Journal of Market Research, 59(6), 703–705. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-050
- Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
- Greengard, S. (2018). ACM: Digital library: Communications of the ACM. dl.acm.org. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3276744
- Hacker, P., & Petkova, B. (2017). Reining in the big promise of big data: Transparency, inequality, and new regulatory frontiers. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 15, i.
- Hermstrüwer, Y., & Dickert, S. (2017). Sharing is daring: An experiment on consent, chilling effects and a salient privacy nudge. International Review of Law and Economics, 51, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.06.001
- Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2019). From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(4), 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5
- Horne, C., & Przepiorka, W. (2019). Technology use and norm change in online privacy: Experimental evidence from vignette studies. Information, Communication and Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1684542
- Kang, C. (2019, July 12). F.T.C. approves Facebook fine of about $5 billion. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/technology/facebook-ftc-fine.html
- Keusch, F. (2019). Trust, privacy & data sharing, ZA6979 Data file Version 1.0.0 [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13248
- Kohler, U. (2019). Possible uses of nonprobability sampling for the social sciences. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00014
- Lindsey, N. (2019, November 25). Google will restrict sharing of user data for Google ads under EU privacy pressure. CPO Magazine. https://www.cpomagazine.com/data-privacy/google-will-restrict-sharing-of-user-data-for-google-ads-under-eu-privacy-pressure/
- Liu, V., Musen, M. A., & Chou, T. (2015). Data breaches of protected health information in the United States. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 313(14), 1471–1473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.2252
- Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Ranzini, G. (2020). Data capitalism and the user: An exploration of privacy cynicism in Germany. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912544
- Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Marreiros, H., Tonin, M., Vlassopoulos, M., & Schraefel, M. C. (2017). “Now that you mention it”: A survey experiment on information, inattention and online privacy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 140, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.024
- Martin, K., & Nissenbaum, H. (2017). Measuring privacy: an empirical test using context to expose confounding variables. Science and Technology Law Review, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.7916/stlr.v18i1.4015
- Martin, K., & Shilton, K. (2016a). Why experience matters to privacy: How context-based experience moderates consumer privacy expectations for mobile applications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1871–1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23500
- Martin, K., & Shilton, K. (2016b). Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices. The Information Society, 32(3), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153012
- Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2012). Big data: A revolution that transforms how we work, live, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- McDonald, A. M., & Cranor, L. F. (2008). The cost of reading privacy policies. ISJLP, 4(3), 543–568.
- Michaelidou, N., & Micevski, M. (2019). Consumers’ ethical perceptions of social media analytics practices: Risks, benefits and potential outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 104, 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.008
- Morrissey, S. (2016). Take notice! The legal and commercial impact of the General Data Protection Regulation’s rules on privacy notices. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 1(1), 46–52.
- Nippert-Eng, C. E. (2010). Islands of privacy. University of Chicago Press.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2018). Respecting context to protect privacy: Why meaning matters. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(3), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9
- O’Brien, C. (2018, December 13). Google Ireland takes the reins for European services. The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/google-ireland-takes-the-reins-for-european-services-1.3730721
- Peretti, K. K. (2008). Data breaches: What the underground world of carding reveals. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 25, 375.
- Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. SUNY Press.
- Presthus, W., & Sørum, H. (2018). Are consumers concerned about privacy? An online survey emphasizing the General Data Protection Regulation. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.081
- Richardson, L. (1988). Secrecy and status: The social construction of forbidden relationships. American Sociological Review, 53(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095688
- Rogers, S. (2016, July 1). What is Google Trends data — And what does it mean? Medium; Google News Lab. https://medium.com/google-news-lab/what-is-google-trends-data-and-what-does-it-mean-b48f07342ee8
- Rubinstein, I., & Petkova, B. (2018). The international impact of the general data protection regulation. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3167389
- Seligman, A. B. (2000). The problem of trust. Princeton University Press.
- Sobolewski, M., & Paliński, M. (2017). How much consumers value on-line privacy? Welfare assessment of new data protection regulation (GDPR) (No. 2017-17). Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw. https://ideas.repec.org/p/war/wpaper/2017-17.html
- Tankard, C. (2016). What the GDPR means for businesses. Network Security, 2016(6), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(16)30056-3
- Thompson, S. A., & Warzel, C. (2019, December 19). Twelve million phones, one dataset, zero privacy. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html
- van Ooijen, I., & Vrabec, H. U. (2018). Does the GDPR enhance consumers’ control over personal data? An Analysis from a Behavioural Perspective. Journal of Consumer Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9399-7
- Wang, R. Y., & Ng, C. N. (2015). Can centralized sanctioning promote trust in social dilemmas? A two-level trust game with incomplete information. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0124513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124513
- Watts, D. J. (2004). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
- Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.