Digital empowerment for whom? An analysis of ‘Network sovereignty’ in low-income, rural communities in Mexico and Tanzania

References

• Adonis, A. A. (2019). Critical engagement on digital sovereignty in International relations: Actor transformation and global hierarchy. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 21(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v21i2.412
   Google Scholar
• Arora, P. (2019). The next billion users: Digital life beyond the west. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben David, Y. (2015). Connecting the last billion (technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2015-23). University of California. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2015/EECS-2015-233.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2008). Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 198–222). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.012
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases (Working Paper No. 15). Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. https://culturalpolicy.princeton.edu/sites/culturalpolicy/files/wp15_dimaggio_hargittai.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile internet. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, M. E. (2017). Network sovereignty: Building the Internet across Indian Country. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Economic and Social Research Foundation. (2013). Capacity Development for Results-Based Monitoring, Evaluation and Auditing—Bunda District. https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/TZA/Formatted%20BUNDA%20%20District%20Report%2015.9.2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Esselaar, S., Song, S., & Stork, C. (2017). Freemium Internet: Next Generation Business Model to Connect Next Billion. 28th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): Competition and Regulation in the Information Age. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/169459
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G. (2012). Hope from the margins. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Levellers Press. http://wealthofthecommons.org/essay/hope-margins
   Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology. (n.d.). WiBACK – Connecting the Unconnected. Retrieved August 11, 2020, from https://wiback.org/en.html
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, A. (2011). Potentials and challenges in the provisioning of broadband services in Serengeti.: ICT for rural development – sustainability of a broadband island in rural Tanzania [Master’s thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology]. KTH Publication Database DiVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-33426
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2015). Rethinking repair. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality and society (pp. 221–240). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. R. (2020). Contesting digital futures: Urban politics, alternative economies, and the movement for technological sovereignty in Barcelona. Antipode, 52(3), 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiani, F. (2015). Giants, dwarfs and decentralized alternatives to internet-based services: An issue of internet governance. Westminster Papers in Culture and Communication, 10(1), 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Tanzania Household Budget Survey 2011/12. https://www.nbs.go.tz/index.php/en/census-surveys/poverty-indicators-statistics/household-budget-survey-hbs/149-household-budget-survey-main-report-2011-1
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Mara Region: Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile. https://www.nbs.go.tz/index.php/en/regional-profiles
   Google Scholar
• Nungu, A., Brown, T., & Pehrson, B. (2011). Business model for developing world municipal broadband network – A case study. Global Information Infrastructure Symposium - GIIS, 2011, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIIS.2011.6026715
   Google Scholar
• Nungu, A., & Pehrson, B. (2011). Towards sustainable broadband communication in rural areas. In R. Szabó, H. Zhu, S. Imre, & R. Chaparadza (Eds.), Accessnets 2010: Access networks (pp. 168–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20931-4_13
   Google Scholar
• Nungu, A. M., Pehrson, B., & Genesis, N. (2008). Serengeti broadband. Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing Regions, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1397705.1397716
   Google Scholar
• Openaid. (n.d.). ICTfor Rural Development—ICT4RD KTH. https://openaid.se/activity/SE-0-SE-6-3200003903-TZA-22040/
   Google Scholar
• Quast, B. (2016). Making the Next Billion Demand Access (Working Paper No. 01). Centre for Finance and Development, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. http://repec.graduateinstitute.ch/pdfs/cfdwpa/CFDWP01-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2000). Digital networks and the state: Some governance questions. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large Information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tacchi, J. (2015). Ethnographic action research: Media, information and communicative ecologies for development initiative. SAGE Research Methods (pp. 220–229). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290.n22
   Google Scholar
• Terzoli, A., Siebörger, I., & Gumbo, S. (2017). Community ‘Broadband Islands’ for Digital Government Access in Rural South Africa. European Conference on Digital Government, 204-211, XIII. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2213114489
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Progress Report: Capacity Development for Results-Based Monitoring, Evaluation and Auditing Projects (Report period: January–March 2014). https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/TZA/ESRF%20Progress_report_Jan_March%202014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar