Mapping online visuals of shale gas controversy: a digital methods approach

References

• Adobe Inc. (2019). Adobe Illustrator. (Version 23.0.2) [Computer Software]. https://adobe.com/products/illustrator
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1997). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shapin technology, building society (2nd ed., pp. 205–224). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, S. (2018). The bubble that got away? Prospects for Shale gas Development in South Africa, 5(4), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2018). Fracking in a fractured environment: Shale gas mining and institutional dynamics in South Africa’s young democracy. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, California.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, A., Amram, A., & Bekkerman, R. (2018). The colors of the national Web: Visual data analysis of the historical Yugoslav Web domain. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 19(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0202-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2017). Shale we Drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudet, H. S. (2019). Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies. Nature Energy, 4, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0399-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugden, D., Evensen, D., & Stedman, R. (2017). A drill by any other name: Social representations, framing, and legacies of natural resource extraction in the fracking industry. Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo, K., & Grant, R. (2015). Public health, science, and policy debate: Being right Is Not enough. American Journal of Public Health, 105(2), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and Global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, M. J. (2011). The great shale debate in the Karoo. South African Journal of Science, 107(7/8), 9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i7/8.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Framing dynamics and political gridlock: The curious case of hydraulic fracturing in New York. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (2017). Hydraulic fracturing as an interpretive policy problem: Lessons on energy controversies in Europe and the U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1277947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology—The issue-attention cycle. The Public interest, 28(Summer), 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• El Universal. (2018, August 4). Piden a AMLO cancelar proyecto hidráulico en NL. Hora Cero Web. https://www.horacero.com.mx/nacional/piden-a-amlo-cancelar-proyecto-hidraulico-en-nl/
   Google Scholar
• Gommeh, E., Dijstelbloem, H., & Metze, T. (2021). Visual discourse coalitions: Visualization and discourse formation in controversies over shale gas development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(0), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1823208
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Cox, R. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Environment and communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Ercan, S. A., & Duus, S. (2017). A picture worth a thousand words? Visuals in public deliberation. 3rd International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, J. E., & Simis, M. (2017). Discourse over a contested technology on twitter: A case study of hydraulic fracturing. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullman, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting images of fracking: How visual frames and standing attitudes shape perceptions of environmental risk and economic benefit. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In knowledge and society studies in the sociology of culture past and present (Vol. 6, p. 1/40). Elsevier Science Limited. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/21-DRAWING-THINGS-TOGETHER-GB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review. 38(suppl 1), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03350.x
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, K. B., Baker, S., Rist, L., & Zachrisson, A. (2016). Theorising pathways to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(5), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1128492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lis, A., & Stankiewicz, P. (2017). Framing shale gas for policy-making in Poland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1143355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loredo, D. (2018, October 10). Sin fracking, México dejaría de aprovechar casi el 50 por ciento de sus reservas: CNH. El Financiero. https://elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/sin-fracking-mexico-dejaria-de-aprovechar-casi-el-50-por-ciento-de-sus-reservas-cnh
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915574602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Moats, D. (2015). Mapping controversies with social media: The case for symmetry. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511560417. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social?: Issues in live social research. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2016). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol. Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2017). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2018a). Visual framing for policy learning: Internet as the ‘eye of the public’. In N. F. Dotti (Ed.), Knowledge, policymaking and learning for European cities and regions (pp. 165–180). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2018b). Framing the future of fracking: Discursive lock-in or energy degrowth in the Netherlands? Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2020). Visualization in environmental policy and planning: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(5), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1798751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2006). Environmental governance in the information age: The emergence of informational governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0508j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer, S. (2018). Networked Images: Visual methodologies for the digital age. Inaugural Lecture, 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Niederer, S., & Colombo, G. (2019). Visual methodologies for Networked Images: Designing visualizations for collaborative research, cross-platform analysis, and public participation. Cross-platform Analysis, and Public Participation. Diseña, 14, 40–67. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.14.40-67
   Google Scholar
• Omena, J. J. (2019). Métodos Digitais: Teoria-prática-crítica. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Querubín, N. S. (2019). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. WIRES Climate Change, 10(2), e569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.569
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2018). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabello, E. T., & Gouveia, F. C. (2019). Métodos digitais nos estudos em saúde: Mapeando usos e propondo sentidos. In J. J. Omena (Ed.), Métodos digitais: Teoria-prática-crítica (1st ed., pp. 143–160). FCSH Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Reforma. (2018, October 6). Descarta AMLO fracking. https://www.mural.com/aplicaciones/articulo/default.aspx?id=1508846
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2015). Digital methods for web research. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–22). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0076
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2017). 5. Foundations of digital methods query design. In M. T. Schäfer & K. van Es (Eds.), The datafied society (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-008
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2019). Doing digital methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarge, M. A., VanDyke, M. S., King, A. J., & White, S. R. (2015). Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing: The role of issue support in the evaluation of visual frames. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2015.6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sood, G. (2017). Clarifai: R Client for the Clarifai API. R package version 0.4.2.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, T., Aarts, N., Termeer, C., & Dewulf, A. (2016). Social media as a new playing field for the governance of agro-food sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. R., & van Tonder, G. (2015). The karoo fracking debate: A christian contribution to the world communities of faith. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Energy Information Administration. (2011). Annual Energy Outlook 2011 with Projections to 2035. EIA. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2011).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valerio-Ureña, G., & Rogers, R. (2019). Characteristics of the digital content about energy-saving in different countries around the world. Sustainability, 11(17), 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek, L., Metze, T., Kunseler, E., Huitzing, H., de Blois, F., & Wardekker, A. (2020). Environmental visualizations: Framing and reframing between science, policy and society. Environmental Science & Policy, 114(9), 497–505.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., Jacomy, M., Bounegru, L., & Gray, J. (2018). Visual network exploration for data journalists. In S. A. Eldridge & B. Franklin (Eds.), The routledge handbook of developments in digital journalism studies (1st ed., pp. 265–283). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270449-21
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., Jacomy, M., & Pereira, D. (2014). Visual Network Analysis. Working Paper, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). The discursive politics of ‘fracking’: Frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Energy democracy, dissent and discourse in the party politics of shale gas in the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics, 29(0), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1740555
   Google Scholar