Organisational and professional hierarchies in a data management system: public–private collaborative building of public healthcare and social services in Finland

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (1995). Things of boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2005). Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2010). Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams. Human Relations, 63(8), 1199–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709355657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A. (2010). Research note: From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709359219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2018). Envisioning the power of data analytics. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, C., & Yoshinaka, Y. (2007). Staging socio-technical spaces: Translating across boundaries in design. Journal of Design Research, 6(1/2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2007.015563
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice. Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., Redden, J., Hintz, A., & Warne, H. (2019). The “golden view”: Data-driven governance in the scoring society. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1413 doi:10.14763/2019.2.1413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolin, B., & McLeod, L. (2012). Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(5), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, S., Lotherington, A. T., Obstfelder, A., & Dyb, K. (2010). Getting the whole picture? New information and communication technologies in healthcare work and organization. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 442–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903095856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helén, I. (2019). Price for a life: An essay on becoming of data-driven market governmentality. Proceedings of the STS Conference Graz 2019, Critical Issues in Science, Technology and Society Studies, 6 - 7 May 2019. https://diglib.tugraz.at/download.php?id=5e29a105b8dfa&location=browse
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A., & Bechmann, A. (2020). Building truths in AI: Making predictive algorithms doable in healthcare. Information, Communication & Society, 23(6), 802–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1751866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogle, L. F. (2016). Data-intensive resourcing in healthcare. BioSocieties, 11(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S. (2016). Sosiologinen materia-toimijaverkostoteoreettisen tutkimustarinan ohennus. Sosiologia, 53(3), 275–291.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). Reframing AI discourse. Minds and Machines, 27(4), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6 doi:10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipio, J., Lääveri, T., Hyppönen, H., Vainiomäki, S., Reponen, J., Kushniruk, A., & Vänskä, J. (2017). Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians’ experiences with EHRs in Finland. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 97, 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerosuo, H. (2001). Boundary encounters as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines. Critical Social Studies, 3(1), 53–65. https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/5128
   Google Scholar
• Keshet, Y., Ben-Arye, E., & Schiff, E. (2013). The use of boundary objects to enhance interprofessional collaboration: Integrating complementary medicine in a hospital setting. Sociology of Health Illness, 35(5), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01520.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivinen, T., & Lammintakanen, J. (2013). The success of a management information system in health care - A case study from Finland. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, E. (2006). Modernising health care. Reinventing professions, the state and the public. The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leskelä, R.-L., Haavisto, I., Jääskeläinen, A., Helander, N., Sillanpää, V., Laaksonen, V., Ranta, T., & Torkki, P. (2019). Tietojohtaminen ja sen kehittäminen: tietojohtamisen arvointimalli ja suosituksia maakuntavalmistelun pohjalta. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 42. Valtioneuvoston kanslia.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L., Eriksén, S., & Borg, C. (2016). The influence of social challenges when implementing information systems in a Swedish health-care organization. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(6), 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S., Dorland, J., & Clausen, C. (2020). Staging: From theory to action. In C. Clausen, D. Vinck, S. Pedersen, & J. Dorland (Eds.), Staging collaborative design and innovation: An action-oriented participatory approach (pp. 20–36). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, K. (2011). From “being there” to “being […] where”: Relocating ethnography. Qualitative Research in Organisations and Management: An International Journal, 6(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641111188402
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Russell, H. B. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., Nind, M., Tilley, L., & Chapman, R. (2015). Negotiating a third space for participatory research with people with learning disabilities: An examination of boundaries and spatial practices. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(4), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1081558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SITRA. (2016). Sote-tiedosta tekoihin. Palvelupaketit raportoinnin työkaluna - ja mitä niillä voidaan seuraavaksi tehdä. https://www.sitra.fi/julkaisut/sote-tiedosta-tekoihin/
   Google Scholar
• Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö. (2020). Sote-tietopaketit – raportointityökalu kunnille. https://stm.fi/sote-tietopaketit
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origins of a concept. Science. Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624 doi:10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedman, R., Kennedy, H., & Jones, R. (2020). Complex ecologies of trust in data practices and data-driven systems. Information, Communication and Society, 23(6), 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1748090 doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1748090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, R. E., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Sargent, L., & Hardy, C. (2008). Power and participation in the production of boundary objects (Working paper series). Cardiff Business School. https://www.coursehero.com/file/25942210/Thomas-et-al-power-and-participation-in-the-production-of-boundary-objectsdoc/
   Google Scholar
• Waring, J., & Latif, A. (2017). Of shepherds, sheep and sheepdogs? Governing the adherent self through complementary and competing “pastorates”. Sociology, 52(5), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517690680
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wisner, K., Lyndon, A., & Chesla, C. A. (2019). The electronic health record’s impact on nurses’ cognitive work: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 94, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrede, S. (2008). Unpacking gendered professional power in the welfare state. Equal Opportunities International, 27(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150810844910
   Google Scholar