3,306
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

The coloniality of collaboration: sources of epistemic obedience in data-intensive astronomy in Chile

ORCID Icon
Pages 425-440 | Received 23 Apr 2020, Accepted 15 Jun 2021, Published online: 21 Jul 2021

References

  • Abebe, R., Aruleba, K., Birhane, A., Kingsley, S., Obaido, G., Remy, S. L., & Sadagopan, S. (2021). Narratives and counternarratives on data sharing in Africa. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 329–341). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01168
  • Anderson, W. (2002). Introduction: Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5/6), 643–658.
  • Barandiaran, J. (2015). Reaching for the stars? Astronomy and growth in Chile. Minerva, 53(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9272-7
  • Bates, J., Lin, Y. W., & Goodale, P. (2016). Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data and Society, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654502
  • Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press.
  • Carpentier, N. (2017). The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community Media participation. Peter Lang.
  • CONICYT. (2012). Astronomy, technology, industry: Roadmap for the fostering of technology development and innovation in the field of astronomy in Chile. https://www.conicyt.cl/astronomia/files/2012/10/Roadmap-Astronomía-25.10.12.pdf
  • Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  • Edwards, P. N., Mayernik, M. S., Batcheller, A. L., Bowker, G. C., & Borgman, C. L. (2011). Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314
  • Gibert, J. (2016). Ciencia anómala: Características de la Ciencia en el Chile Neoliberal [Abnormal science: Characteristics of the sciences in neoliberal Chile]. Contenido: Cultura y Ciencias Sociales, 7, 3–16.
  • Gnida, M. (2019). An astronomical data challenge. Symmetry. https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/an-astronomical-data-challenge
  • Guridi, J. A., Pertuze, J. A., & Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2020). Natural laboratories as policy instruments for technological learning and institutional capacity building: The case of Chile’s astronomy cluster. Research Policy, 49(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103899
  • Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (2009). Jim Gray on eScience: A transformed scientific method. In T. Hey, S. Tansley, & K. Tolle (Eds.), The fourth paradigm (pp. xvii–xxxi). Microsoft Research.
  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Sage.
  • Kreimer, P. (2006). ¿Dependientes o integrados? La ciencia latinoamericana y la nueva división internacional del trabajo [Dependant or integrated? Latinamerican science and the new international division of labour]. Nómadas, 24, 199–212.
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). Verso.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
  • McCray, P. (2004). Giant telescopes: Astronomical ambition and the promise of technology. Hardvard University Press.
  • McCray, P. (2017). The biggest data of all: Making and sharing a digital universe. Osiris, 32(1), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/693912
  • Medina, E., Marques, C., & Holmes, C. (2014). Introduction: Beyond imported magic. In E. Medina, I. da Costa Marques, & C. Holmes (Eds.), Beyond imported magic: Essays on science,technology, and society in Latin America (pp. 1–23). MIT Press.
  • Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
  • Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
  • Ministry of the Economy. (2019). Data observatory: Llamado a Propuestas de Valor [Data observatory: Call for partners]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DXCjoAcF7lrDiNI2GcpiOv7RJooyU3-b/view
  • Peek, J. E. G., Desai, V., White, R. L., D’Abrusco, R., Mazzarella, J. M., Grant, C., Novacescu, J. L., Scire, E., & Winkelman, S. (2019). Robust archives maximize scientific accessibility (pp. 1–10). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06234
  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
  • Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353
  • Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
  • Silva, B. K. (2020). Chile: A center of global astronomy, 1850–2019. Oxford research encyclopedia of Latin American history. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory
  • SOCHIAS. (2019). Censos de Astrónomos/As [Censuses of astronomers]. https://sochias.cl/censos-de-astronomos/
  • Taylor, L., & Broeders, D. (2015). In the name of development: Power, profit and the datafication of the global south. Geoforum, 64, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002
  • Verhulst, S. (2017). Data collaboratives: Exchanging data to create public value across Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. https://blogs.iadb.org/conocimiento-abierto/en/data-collaboratives-exchanging-data-to-create-public-value-across-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/.