News from the ad archive: how journalists use the Facebook Ad Library to hold online advertising accountable

References

• Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019). Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook’s Ad delivery Can lead to biased outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3(No. CSCW)), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359301
   Google Scholar
• Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. Social Media + Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkner, T., Koenen, E., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2018). A Century of Journalism History as Challenge Digital archives, sources, and methods: Digital archives, sources, and methods. Digital Journalism, 6(9), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1514271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodo, B., Natali, H., & De Vreese, C. (2017). Political microtargeting: A manchurian candidate or a dark horse? Internet Policy Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.776
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campaign Legal Center v. Federal Elections Commission. (2020). Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. Case 1:20-cv-00588. https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/clc_200588_complaint.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., Ó Fathaigh, R., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2019). The regulation of online political micro-targeting in Europe. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommett, K. (2020). Regulating digital campaigning: The need for precision in Calls for transparency. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommett, K. (2021). The inter-institutional impact of digital platform companies on democracy: A case study of the UK media’s digital campaigning coverage. New Media & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, L., Lauinger, T., & McCoy, D. (2020). A Security analysis of the Facebook Ad library. Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00084
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, L., Sakhuja, S., Dey, R., & McCoy, D. (2019). An Analysis of United States Online Political Advertising Transparency. arXiv:1902.04385 [cs.SI].
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2021a). What is the Facebook Ad Library and how do I search it?. Facebook Business Help Center. https://www.facebook.com/business/help/214754279118974?id=288762101909005 [https://perma.cc/67MB-ULNV]
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2021b). Ads about Social Issues, Elections or Politics. Facebook Business Help Center. https://web.archive.org/web/20210415224853if/
   Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M. (2019). The digital prism: Transparency and managed visibilities in a datafied world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic power of transparency. Politics & Society, 41(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, W. (2016). Manipulating citizens: How political campaigns’ Use of behavioral Social Science harms democracy. New Political Science, 38(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2015.1125119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. (2020, August 11). Tiktok user reveals ingenious Facebook trick to find hidden discount codes. The Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/discount-codes-facebook-ad-library-tik-tok-a9665221.html
   Google Scholar
• Grygiel, J., & Sager, W. (2020). Unmasking uncle Sam: A Legal test for identifying State media. UC Irvine L. Rev, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Heawood, J. (2018). Pseudo-public political speech: Democratic implications of the Cambridge analytica scandal. Information Polity, 23(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsel, A., Mathias, J. N., Werdmuller, B., Griffey, J., Hopkins, M., Peterson, C., & Feamster, N. (2019). Estimating Publication Rates of Non-Election Ads by Facebook and Google. Draft article. https://github.com/citp/mistaken-ad-enforcement/blob/master/estimating-publication-rates-of-non-election-ads.pdf
   Google Scholar
• InfluenceMap. (2019). Big Oil’s Real Agenda on Climate Change. https://influencemap.org/report/How-Big-Oil-Continues-to-Oppose-the-Paris-Agreement-38212275958aa21196dae3b76220bddc
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, J., & Kolkman, D. (2019). Transparent to whom? No algorithmic accountability without a critical audience. Information, Communication & Society, 22(14), 2081–2096. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., Kou, C., Bankston, L., Yun Kim, S., Heinrich, R., Baragwanath, R., & Raskutti, G. (2018). The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on facebook. Political Communication, 35(4), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & Barrett, B. (2020). Democratic tradeoffs: Platforms and political advertising. Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 16(493), 493–519.
   Google Scholar
• Kwoka, M. (2016). FOIA, Inc. Duke Law Journal, 65(1461), 1361–1437.
   Google Scholar
• Leerssen, P. (2020). The soap Box as a black Box: Regulating transparency in Social Media recommender systems. European Journal of Law and Technology, 11(2).
   Google Scholar
• Leerssen, P., Ausloos, J., Zarouali, B., Helberger, N., & De Vreese, C. (2019). Platform Ad archives: Promises and pitfalls. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1421
   Google Scholar
• Lourenco, P. (2016). Evidence of an open government data portal impact on the public sphere. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(3), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2016070102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
   Google Scholar
• Mccracken, G. (1998). The long interview. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public accountability. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2009). Regulating robocalls: Are automated Calls the sound of, or a threat to, democracy? Michigan Technology Law Review, 16(1), 213–253.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (2018). Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mozilla. (2019). Data Collection Log — EU Ad Transparency Report. Mozilla Ad Transparency. https://adtransparency.mozilla.org/eu/log/
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2014). Watchdog journalism. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public accountability (pp. 525–543). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quarati, A., & De Martino, M. (2019). Open government data usage: a brief overview. IDEAS ‘19: Proceedings of the 23rd International Database Applications & Engineering Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Rieke, A., & Bogen, M. (2018). Leveling the Platform: Real Transparency for Paid Messages on Facebook. UpTurn Report. https://www.upturn.org/static/reports/2018/facebook-ads/files/Upturn-Facebook-Ads-2018-05-08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, A. (2020). Facebook’s threat to the NYU Ad Observatory is an attack on ethical research. NiemanLab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/10/facebooks-threat-to-the-nyu-ad-observatory-is-an-attack-on-ethical-research/
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M., Santos de Oliveira, L., Andreou, A., Olma Vaz de Melo, P. G., & O., Benevenuto, F. (2020). Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebook. WWW ‘20: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-Checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H., Beam, R. H., Brownlee, B. J., Voakes, P. S., & Cleveland Wilhoit, G. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: US News people at the Dawn of a New millennium. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Möller, J., Kruikemeijer, S., Ó Fathaigh, R., Irion, K., Dobber, T., Bodo, B., & De Vreese, C. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82. doi:10.18352/ulr.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar