References
- Adhikary, M. (2019, January 18). Data is the new oil: Mukesh Ambani says global firms should not control India’s data. Business Today. https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/data-new-oil-mukesh-ambani-says-global-firms-should-not-control-india-data/story/311244.html
- Agamben, G. (1995). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.; 1 edition). Stanford University Press.
- Ajana, B. (2013). Governing through biometrics: The biopolitics of identity. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Andrejevic, M. (2007). Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review, 10(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420701715365
- Arora, M. (2018). Vickram Crishna v. UIDAI and S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India, Transfer Case (Civil) no. 152 of 2013, Supreme Court of India.
- Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Surveillance and identity: Discourse, subjectivity and the state. Routledge.
- Bartelson, J. (2014). Sovereignty as symbolic form. Routledge.
- Basu, A. (2019, November 7). India’s role in global cyber policy formulation. Lawfare. https://www.lawfareblog.com/indias-role-global-cyber-policy-formulation
- Basu, A., Hickok, E., & Chawla, A. S. (2019). The localisation Gambit: Unpacking policy moves for the sovereign control of data in India. The Centre for Internet and Society. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/the-localisation-gambit-unpacking-policy-moves-for-the-sovereign-control-of-data-in-india
- Basu, A., & Sherman, J. (2020, January 23). Key global takeaways from India’s revised personal data protection bill. Lawfare. https://www.lawfareblog.com/key-global-takeaways-indias-revised-personal-data-protection-bill
- Bhuyan, A. (2018, January 18). Aadhaar isn’t just about privacy. There are 30 challenges the Govt is facing in supreme court. The Wire. https://thewire.in/government/aadhaar-privacy-government-supreme-court
- Bonilla, Y. (2017). Unsettling sovereignty. Cultural Anthropology, 32(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.3.02
- Breckenridge, K. (2014). Biometric state: The global politics of identification and surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the present. Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, W. (2014). Walled states, waning sovereignty. Zone Books.
- Budnitsky, S., & Jia, L. (2018). Branding internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 594–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751151
- Burman, A., & Sharma, U. (2021, April 14). How would data localization benefit India? Carnegie India. https://carnegieindia.org/2021/04/14/how-would-data-localization-benefit-india-pub-84291
- Cohen, J. E. (2018). The biopolitical public domain: The legal construction of the surveillance economy. Philosophy & Technology, 31(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2
- Cohen, L. (2016, March 4). Duplicate, leak, deity. Limn. https://limn.it/duplicate-leak-deity/
- Committee of Experts under the Chairmanship of Justice B.N. Srikrishna. (2018). A free and fair digital economy: Protecting privacy, empowering Indians. Ministry of Electronic and Information Technology. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Data_Protection_Committee_Report-comp.pdf
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
- Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
- Dattani, K. (2020). Governtrepreneurism” for good governance: The case of Aadhaar and the India stack. Area, 52(2), 411–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12579
- Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. (2019). Draft national e-commerce policy: India’s data for India’s development. https://dipp.gov.in/sites/default/files/DraftNational_e-commerce_Policy_23February2019.pdf
- Divan, S. (2018). Opening statement on behalf of the petitioners, writ petition (civil) no. 829 of 2013, Supreme Court of India.
- Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (First edition). Picador.
- Gelb, A., Mukherjee, A., & Navis, K. (2018, September 26). What India’s supreme court ruling on Aadhaar means for the future. Center For Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/what-india-supreme-court-ruling-aadhaar-means-future
- Gitelman, L., & Jackson, V. (2013). Introduction. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), Raw data is an oxymoron (pp. 1–14). The MIT Press.
- Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012
- Jacobsen, E. K. U. (2012). Unique Identification: inclusion and surveillance in the Indian biometric assemblage. Security Dialogue, 43(5), 457–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612458336
- Joshi, D. (2020). Interrogating India’s quest for data sovereignty (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3648047). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3648047
- Khera, R. (2018). Dissent on Aadhaar: Big data meets big brother. Orient BlackSwan.
- Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Kovacs, A., & Ranganathan, N. (2019). Data sovereignty, of whom? Limits and suitability of sovereignty frameworks for data in India (Working Paper No. 03; Data Governance Network). Internet Democracy Project. https://datagovernance.org/report/data-sovereignty
- Lyon, D. (2009). Identifying citizens: ID cards as surveillance. Polity.
- Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146
- Magnet, S. A. (2011). When biometrics fail: Gender, race, and the technology of identity. Duke University Press Books.
- Nair, V. (2018). An eye for an I: Recording biometrics and reconsidering identity in postcolonial India. Contemporary South Asia, 26, 143–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2017.1410102
- Nolin, J. M. (2020). Data as oil, infrastructure or asset? Three metaphors of data as economic value. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2019-0044
- Polatin-Reuben, D., & Wright, J. (2014). An internet with {BRICS} characteristics: Data sovereignty and the Balkanisation of the Internet. 4th {USENIX} workshop on free and Open communications on the internet ({FOCI} 14). https://www.usenix.org/conference/foci14/workshop-program/presentation/polatin-reuben
- Raley, R. (2013). Dataveillance and counterveillance. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), Raw data is an oxymoron (pp. 121–145). The MIT Press.
- Ranganathan, N. (2020). The economy (and regulatory practice) that biometrics inspires: A study of the Aadhaar project. In A. Kak (Ed.), Regulating biometrics: Global approaches and urgent questions (pp. 52–61). AI Now. https://ainowinstitute.org/regulatingbiometrics.html
- Rao, U. (2013). Biometric marginality: UID and the shaping of homeless identities in the city. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(13), 71–77.
- Rao, U., & Greenleaf, G. W. (2013). Subverting ID from above and below: The uncertain shaping of India’s new instrument of e-governance. Surveillance & Society, 11(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v11i3.4496
- Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.
- Ruppert, E., & Scheel, S. (2021). Data practices: Making up a European people. Goldsmiths Press.
- Sarkar, S. (2014). The Unique Identity (UID) project, biometrics and re-imagining governance in India. Oxford Development Studies, 42(4), 516–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2014.924493
- Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
- Sengoopta, C. (2003). Imprint of the Raj: How fingerprinting was born in colonial India. Macmillan.
- Singh, R. (2019). Give me a database and I will raise the nation-state. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 42(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1602810
- Sinha, A., & Basu, A. (2019). The politics of India’s data protection ecosystem. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(49), 7–8.
- Thompson, E. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. Vintage.
- Venkataramakrishnan, R. (2018, August 28). The daily fix: UP pilferage scam reveals hollowness of government’s claims about Aadhaar. https://scroll.in/article/891975/the-daily-fix-up-pilferage-scam-reveals-hollowness-of-governments-claims-about-aadhaar
- Vidyut. (2018a, February 6). Constitutional validity of Aadhaar, Day 6: State “puffery” in claims of Aadhaar benefits. MediaNama. https://www.medianama.com/2018/02/223-constitutional-validity-aadhaar-day-6-state-puffery-claims-aadhaar-benefits/
- Vidyut. (2018b, February 7). Constitutional validity of Aadhaar, Day 7: This degrades free individuals. MediaNama. https://www.medianama.com/2018/02/223-constitutional-validity-of-aadhaar-day-7-this-degrades-free-individuals/
- Vidyut. (2018c, February 21). Constitutional validity of Aadhaar, Day 10: “Consent is illusory.” MediaNama. https://www.medianama.com/2018/02/223-constitutional-validity-aadhaar-day-10-consent-illusory/
- Vidyut. (2018d, March 21). Constitutional validity of Aadhaar, Day 19: Freedom of conscience. MediaNama. https://www.medianama.com/2018/03/223-constitutional-validity-of-aadhaar-day-19-freedom-of-conscience/
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.