References
- An, H. (2018). 페이스북, 6.13 지방선거 투표 독려 지원 [Facebook Encourages 6.13 Local Election]. ZDNet. http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=130919
- Ananny, M. (2020). Making up political people: How social media create the ideals, definitions, and probabilities of political speech. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 4(2), 351–366.
- Andres, R., & Slivko, O. (2021). Combating online hate speech: The impact of legislation on Twitter (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 21-103). https://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp21103.pdf
- Barendt, E. (2005). Political speech. In Freedom of speech (pp. 154–197). Oxford University Press.
- Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
- Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2016). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, 18(3), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543163
- Declaration on freedom of expression in response to the adoption of the Network Enforcement Law („Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz”) by the Federal Cabinet on April 5, 2017. (2017). http://deklaration-fuer-meinungsfreiheit.de/en/
- Deibert, R. J. (2009). The geopolitics of internet control: Censorship, sovereignty, and cyberspace. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 323–336).
- Drake, W. J., Vinton, C. G., & Kleinwächter, W. (2016, January). Internet fragmentation: An overview. World Economic Forum.
- Druckman, J. N., Gubitz, S. R., Lloyd, A. M., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). How incivility on partisan media (de) polarizes the electorate. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1086/699912
- Echickson, W., & Knodt, O. (2018). Germany’s NetzDG: A key test for combating online hate. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/RR%20No2018-09_Germany%27s%20NetzDG.pdf
- EFF. (2020). Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
- Einwiller, S. A., & Kim, S. (2020). How online content providers moderate user-generated content to prevent harmful online communication: An analysis of policies and their implementation. Policy & Internet, 12(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.239
- European Commission. (2022a). Communication from the commission establishing a European declaration on digital rights and principles for the digital decade. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/declaration-european-digital-rights-and-principles#Declaration
- European Commission. (2022b). Digital Services Act: Commission welcomes political agreement on rules ensuring a safe and accountable online environment. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_2545
- Facebook. (2018, May 23). Hard questions: What’s Facebook’s strategy for stopping false news? – about Facebook. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2018/05/hard-questions-false-news/
- Facebook. (2020a). Content restrictions based on local law. Facebook Transparency. https://transparency.facebook.com/content-restrictions
- Facebook. (2020b). Community standards: Hate speech. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/hate_speech
- Facebook. (2020c). Community standards: False news. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/false_news
- Facebook. (2020d). Stellungnahme zum Referentenentwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes. [Official statement to Ministry of Justice inquiry]. https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Stellungnahmen/2020/Downloads/021720_Stellungnahme_Facebook_RefE_NetzDG.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
- Facebook. (2020e). Facebook veröffentlicht fünften NetzDG-Transparenzbericht https://about.fb.com/de/news/2020/07/facebook-veroeffentlicht-fuenften-netzdg-transparenzbericht/
- Facebook. (2020f). Defamation reporting form. https://www.facebook.com/help/contact/430253071144967
- Facebook. (2021). NetzDG transparency report: January 2021. https://about.fb.com/de/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2021/01/Facebook-NetzDG-Transparency-Report-January-2021.pdf
- Garrett, R. S., Eckman, S. J., & Shanton, K. L. (2020). Campaign and election security policy: Overview and recent developments for congress (p. 42). Congressional Research Service.
- Gelber, K. (2010). Freedom of political speech, hate speech and the argument from democracy: The transformative contribution of capabilities theory. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(3), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2009.8
- Gillespie, T. (2017). Governance of and by platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Thomas (Eds.), SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 254–278).
- Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
- Gleicher, N. (2020, October 27). Removing coordinated inauthentic behavior. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/10/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-mexico-iran-myanmar/
- Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
- He, D. (2020). Governing hate content online: How the rechtsstaat shaped the policy discourse on the NetzDG in Germany. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3746–3768. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14213
- Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735
- Jeevanjee, K., Lim, B., Ly, I., Perault, M., Ruddock, J., Schmeling, T., Vattikonda, N., & Zhou, J. (2021, March 23). All the ways Congress wants to change the Internet’s most fundamental law. Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/technology/2021/03/section-230-reform-legislative-tracker.html
- Kee, H. (2018). The revision of the Public Election Law due to the spread of fake news. Ajou Law Review, 12(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.21589/ajlaw.2018.12.3.237
- Killion, V. (2019). The first amendment: Categories of speech. Focus.
- Kim, K. (2016). Korean Internet and real name verification requirement. Kor. UL Rev., 20, 87.
- Klonick, K. (2017). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131, 1598. https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/04/the-new-governors-the-people-rulesand-processes-governing-online-speech/
- Klonick, K. (2020). The Facebook oversight board: Creating an independent institution to adjudicate online free expression. Yale Law Journal, 129, 2418. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/feature/the-facebookoversight-board
- Kum, J. (2016). 선관위, 총선 때 게시물 1만7101건 삭제 [National Election Commission Deleted 17,101 Posts During the General Election]. Media Today. http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=130919
- Liesching, M., Funke, C., Hermann, A., Kneschke, C., Michnick, C., Nguyen, L., Prüßner, J., Rudolph, S., & Zschammer, V. (2021). Das NetzDG in der praktischen Anwendung: Eine Teilevaluation des Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes. Medienrecht & Medientheorie (3).
- Myers West, S. (2018). Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society, 1461444818773059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773059
- National Election Commission. (2017). 중앙선관위, 제19대 대선에서 페이스북과 협업 강화. [National Election Commission Reinforces Cooperation with Facebook for the 19th Presidential Election]. https://www.nec.go.kr/site/nec/ex/bbs/View.do?cbIdx=1090&bcIdx=136411
- National Election Commission. (2021). 중앙선관위, 제20대 대통령선거 허위사실공표·비방 차단 위해 16개 유관기관과 공동 대응. [National Election Commission Cooperates with 16 Institutions to Restrict False Information]. https://www.nec.go.kr/site/nec/ex/bbs/View.do?cbIdx=1090&bcIdx=150828
- Naughton, J. (2018). Platform power and responsibility in the attention economy. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple. Oxford University Press.
- O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2018). Four Internets: The geopolitics of digital governance.
- Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity.
- Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
- Rosen, G. (2020, October 7). Preparing for Election Day. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/10/preparing-for-election-day/
- Rosen, G., Harbath, K., Gleicher, N., & Leathern, R. (2019, October 21). Helping to protect the 2020 US Elections. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/10/update-on-election-integrity-efforts/
- Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
- Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton University Press.
- Suzor, N. P., West, S. M., Quodling, A., & York, J. (2019). What do we mean when we talk about transparency? Toward meaningful transparency in commercial content moderation. International Journal of Communication, 13(0), 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9736
- Taylor, L. (2021). Public actors without public values: Legitimacy, domination and the regulation of the technology sector. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 897–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00441-4
- Torfing, J. (2012). Governance networks. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 99–112). University Press.
- Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0064
- Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.