References
- Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
- Canares, M. P., Marcial, D., & Narca, M. (2016). Enhancing citizen engagement with open government data. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(2), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i2.3240
- Chen, L. (2008). Open information system and crisis communication in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750701861905
- Chen, X. (2012). Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. Cambridge University Press.
- Crossley, N. (2003). From reproduction to transformation: Social movement fields and the radical habitus. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206003
- Crossley, N. (2006). The field of psychiatric contention in the UK, 1960–2000. Social Science & Medicine, 62(3), 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.016
- Currie, M., Paris, B. S., Pasquetto, I., & Pierre, J. (2016). The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles county. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663566
- Ekiert, G., Perry, E. J., & Yan, X. (eds.). (2020). Ruling by other means: State-mobilized movements. Cambridge University Press.
- Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
- Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond transparency, participation, and collaboration? A reflection on the dimensions of open government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726
- Givan, R. K., Roberts, K. M., & Soule, S. A. (2010). Introduction: The dimensions of diffusion. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements: Actors, mechanisms, and political effects (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.
- Goodman, D. S. (2008). Conclusion: News from the front. In L. Li (Ed.), The Chinese state in transition: Processes and contests in local China (pp. 145–156). Routledge.
- Gray, J. (2019). Data witnessing: Attending to injustice with data in Amnesty international’s decoders project. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573915
- Heurlin, C. (2016). Responsive authoritarianism in China. Cambridge University Press.
- Hintz, A., & Milan, S. (2018). Through a glass, darkly: Everyday acts of authoritarianism in the liberal west. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3939–3959.
- Horgan, L., & Dourish, P. (2018). Ambiguity, ambivalence, and activism: Data organizing inside the institution. Krisis, 1. https://archive.krisis.eu/ambiguity-ambivalence-and-activism-data-organizing-inside-the-institution/?
- Huang, V. G. (2016). Speaking out: Testimonial narratives of Chinese cyberpetitioners under networked authoritarianism. Discourse, Context & Media, 14, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.002
- Huang, V. G. (2021). Musical resistance and musical bodies in the making: A worker-band from southern China. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(6), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211011756
- Huang, V. G., & Liu, T. (2021). Gamifying contentious politics: Gaming capital and playful resistance. Games and Culture, 17(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211014143
- Jiang, M., & Fu, K.-W. (2018). Chinese social media and big data: Big data, big brother, big profit? Policy & Internet, 10(4), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.187
- Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
- Kim, J., Stern, R. E., Liebman, B. L., & Wu, X. (2022). Closing open government: Grassroots policy conversion of China’s open government information regulation and its aftermath. Comparative Political Studies, 55(2), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024314
- Meng, A., & DiSalvo, C. (2018). Grassroots resource mobilization through counter-data action. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718796862
- Mertha, A. (2009). Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0”: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China Quarterly, 200, 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741009990592
- Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869
- Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2021). Big data from the south(s): An analytical matrix to investigate data at the margins. In D. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociology and digital media (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.
- Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from old open government to new open government: Four critical dimensions and case illustrations. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691024
- Najam, A. (2000). The four C’s of third sector-government relations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.10403
- O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge University Press.
- Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2018). Group development stages in open government data engagement initiatives: A comparative case studies analysis. In P. Parycek, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, E. Tambouris, E. Kalampokis, & S. Virkar (Eds.), Electronic government (pp. 48–59). Springer International Publishing.
- Ricker, B., Cinnamon, J., & Dierwechter, Y. (2020). When open data and data activism meet: An analysis of civic participation in Cape Town, South Africa. The Canadian Geographer, 64(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12608
- Rokem, J., Fregonese, S., Ramadan, A., Pascucci, E., Rosen, G., Charney, I., Paasche, T. F., & Sidaway, J. D. (2017). Interventions in urban geopolitics. Political Geography, 61, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.04.004
- Schrock, A. R. (2016). Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society, 18(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629469
- Shieh, S. (2009). Beyond corporatism and civil society: Three modes of state–NGO interaction in China. In J. Schwartz & S. Shieh (Eds.), State and society responses to social welfare needs in China: Serving the people (pp. 22–42). Routledge.
- Stern, R. E., & O’Brien, K. J. (2012). Politics at the boundary: Mixed signals and the Chinese state. Modern China, 38(2), 174–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700411421463
- Subra, P. (2012). Geopolitics: A unique or multidimensional concept? Place, issues and tools of local geopolitics. Hérodote, 3, 45–70. https://doi.org/10.3917/her.146.0045
- Sun, Y., & Huang, V. G. (2021). Embedded data activism: The institutionalization of a grassroots environmental data initiative in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 15(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1963997
- Sun, Y., & Yan, W. (2020). The power of data from the global south: Environmental civic tech and data activism in China. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2144–2162.
- Tan, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). How can the “weak position” create “smart power”? The action logic of Chinese grassroots NGOs in promoting the governance of wicked problem. Journal of Public Management, 18(4), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.20210902.002
- Tan, Y. (2014). Transparency without democracy: The unexpected effects of China’s environmental disclosure policy. Governance, 27(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12018
- Tarantino, M. (2020). Navigating a datascape: Challenges in automating environmental data disclosure in China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1659132
- Tarantino, M., & Zimmermann, B. (2017). Database green: Software, environmentalism and data flows in China. The China Quarterly, 229, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016001600
- Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge University Press.
- Tong, Z. (2014). The change of organizational mode of environmentalism and the development of social movement networks. Journal of Nanjing Tech University, 13(1), 86–93.
- Torres, G. (2020). Auditing the state: Everyday forms of institutional resistance in the Mexican freedom of information process. (DATACTIVE Working Paper No. 1/2019).
- Voltmer, K. (2006). The mass media and the dynamics of political communication in processes of democratization. An introduction. In K. Voltmer (Ed.), Mass media and political communication in new democracies (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
- Wang, J. (2019). The other digital China: Nonconfrontational activism on the social web. Harvard University Press.
- Yang, G. (2009). The power of the Internet in China: Citizen activism online. Cambridge University Press.