Word on the street: politicians, mediatized street protest, and responsiveness on social media

References

• Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the US environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–1620. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbour, B. (2014). Issue frame ownership: The partisan roots of campaign rhetoric. Political Communication, 31(4), 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., & Zeitzoff, T. (2018). The new public address system: Why do world leaders adopt social media? International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, C. (2021). Political sociology in a time of protest. Current Sociology, 69(6), 919–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211024692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., Bischof, D., & Wouters, R. (2021). The public, the protester, and the bill: Do legislative agendas respond to public opinion signals? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1729226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbáth, E., & Gessler, T. (2020). Different worlds of contention? European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 910–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2019). Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 508–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Forms, repertoires and cycles of protest. In D. della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Social movements: An introduction (pp. 165–192). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational protest and global activism. Rowman & Littlefeld Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• De Mulder, A. (2022). Making sense of citizens’ sense of being represented. A novel conceptualisation and measure of feeling represented. Representation, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2022.2095662
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science Advances, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., & Persson, M. (2013). Communicative responsiveness and other central concepts in between-election democracy. In P. Esaiasson & H. M. Narud (Eds.), Between-election democracy: The representative relationship after election day (pp. 15–33). ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gause, L. (2022). The advantage of disadvantage. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillion, D. Q. (2013). The political power of protest: Minority activism and shifts in public policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2007). Useless protest? A time-series analysis of the policy outcomes of ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in the United States, 1977-1995. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.12.1.b05j1087v7pxg382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (2019). Mechanisms of responsiveness: What MPs think of interest organizations and How they deal with them. Political Studies, 67(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718784156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., & Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006297169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S. (2014). Protesting culture and economics in Western Europe: New cleavages in left and right politics. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2018). Who responds to protest? Protest politics and party responsiveness in Western Europe. Party Politics, 24(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816657375
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B., Bentele, K., & Soule, S. (2007). Protest and policymaking: Explaining fluctuation in congressional attention to rights issues, 1960–1986. Social Forces, 86(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Spoon, J.-J. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3-4), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000038603.34963.de
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Dyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A., & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114531383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, B. (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Su, Y. (2002). The war at home: Antiwar protests and congressional voting, 1965 to 1973. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 696–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters Institute digital news report 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Antistate rebels, conventional participants, or everyone? Comparative Politics, 37(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/20072882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P., & Maney, G. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505. https://doi.org/10.1086/316964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., Van Aelst, P., & Praet, S. (2021). Party ownership or individual specialization? A comparison of politicians’ individual issue attention across three different agendas. Party Politics, 27(4), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. (1986). The Art of political manipulation. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D., & Earl, J. (2017). The past, present, and future of media and social movements studies. In J. Earl & D. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social movements and media (pp. 1–22). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Parliamentary questioning in 17 European parliaments: Some steps towards comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572331003740115
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, S., & Olzak, S. (2004). When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C. (2017). Spontaneous collective action: Peripheral mobilization during the Arab spring. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesen, G. (2013). When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2015). Follow the leader! direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Van Erkel, P., D’heer, E., & Harder, R. (2017). Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp, K. (2017). The influence of issue ownership perceptions on behavior of journalists. University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Wouters, R., Hutter, S., Jennings, W., Gava, R., Tresch, A., Varone, F., Grossman, E., Breunig, C., & Brouard, S. (2016). The media as a dual mediator of the political agenda setting effect of protest: A longitudinal study in six west-European countries. Social Forces, 1–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2017). Surviving information overload: How elite politicians select information. Governance, 30(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The complex agenda-setting power of protest. Demonstrations, media, parliament, government, and legislation in Belgium, 1993-2000. Mobilization, 17(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.17.2.pw053m281356572h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R. (2013). From the street to the screen: Characteristics of protest events as determinants of television news coverage. Mobilization, 18(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.18.1.y6067731j4844067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R., & Van Camp, K. (2017). Less than expected? How media cover demonstration turnout. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(4), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217720773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar