The party-on-the-Net: the digital face of partisan organization and activism

References

• Aaker, J., & Chang, V. (2009). Obama and the Power of Social Media and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Abrutyn, S., & Lizardo, O. (2022). A motivational theory of roles, rewards, and institutions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., Giovannini, A., & Seddone, A. (2018). ‘No regionalism please, we are Leghisti !’ The transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the leadership of Matteo Salvini. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(5), 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1512977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. (2010). The ex-presidents. Journal of Democracy, 21(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barberà, O., Barrio, A., & Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2019). New parties’ linkages with external groups and civil society in Spain: A preliminary assessment. Mediterranean Politics, 24(5), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1428146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardi, L., Calossi, E., & Pizzimenti, E. (2017). Which face comes first? The ascendancy of the party in public office. In T. Poguntke, P. Webb, & S. E. Scarrow (Eds.), Organizing political parties: Representation, participation, and power (First edition). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman. (2020). Political cyberbullying: Perpetrators and targets of a new digital aggression. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Knüpfer, C. (2018). The democratic interface: Technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1655–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2017). Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/07/Troops-Trolls-and-Troublemakers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, E., & Yörük, E. (2017). Digital populism: Trolls and political polarization of twitter in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4093–4117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantijoch, M., Cutts, D., & Gibson, R. (2016). Moving slowly up the ladder of political engagement: A ‘spill-over’ model of internet participation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty, R. K. (2004). Parties as franchise systems: The stratarchical organizational imperative. Party Politics, 10(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (Second Edition). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curnin, S. (2016). Organizational boundary spanning. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–5). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. (2020). Digital movement parties: A comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei. Information, Communication & Society, 23(12), 1770–1786. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631375
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, C. (2005). Explanatory typologies in qualitative studies of international politics. International Organization, 59(2), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2017). Social media teams as digital vanguards. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1161817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media. Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2021). Are digital parties more democratic than traditional parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle’s online decision-making platforms. Party Politics, 27(4), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819884878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2015). Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics, 21(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., Greffet, F., & Cantijoch, M. (2017). Friend or Foe? Digital technologies and the changing nature of party membership. Political Communication, 34(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1221011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Penguin University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, T., & Peña, A. M. (2021). The rise of the contentious right: Digitally intermediated linkage strategies in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 63(3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2021.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimme, C., Preuss, M., Adam, L., & Trautmann, H. (2017). Social bots: Human-like by means of human control? Big Data, 5(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2013464118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2020). Let them eat Tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. Liveright Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hartleb, F. (2013). Anti-elitist cyber parties?: Understanding the future of European political parties. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1480
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, M., & Rojas, F. (2015). Party in the street: The antiwar movement and the Democratic Party after 9/11. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. (2021). Unravelling the new plebiscitary democracy: Towards a research agenda. Government and Opposition, 56(4), 615–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J., & Paolucci, C. (1999). The business firm model of party organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 307–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. (2020). The four knights of intra-party democracy: A rescue for party delegitimation. Party Politics, 26(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818754599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2017). Analytic activism. Digital listening and the new political strategy. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1993). The evolution of party organizations in Europe: The three faces of party organization. American Review of Politics, 14(4), 593–617.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. (2002). The internal life of parties. In K. R. Luther, & F. Muller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the New Europe (pp. 87–118). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (2009). The cartel party thesis: A restatement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709991782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, A., & Pérez, F. S. (2019). Reflexive technopopulism: Podemos and the search for a new left-wing hegemony. European Political Science, 18(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0140-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2006). Movement parties. In handbook of party politics, edited by R. Katz and W. Crotty (pp. 278–290). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalancette, M., & Raynauld, V. (2019). The power of political image: Justin trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(7), 888–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobera, J., & Portos, M. (2021). Decentralizing electoral campaigns? New-old parties, grassroots and digital activism. Information, Communication and Society, 24(10), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macwilliams, M. C. (2016). Who decides when the party doesn’t? Authoritarian voters and the rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science and Politics, 49(4), 716–721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001463
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, S. (2020). All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics, 40(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719833274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulin, A. (2020). An overview of ten years of liquid democracy research.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, A. M. (2021). Activist parties and hybrid party behaviours: A typological reassessment of partisan mobilisation. Political Studies Review, 19(4), 637–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, J. (2017). Social media and citizen participation in ‘official’ and ‘unofficial’ electoral promotion: A structural analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders Digital Campaign. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P. D., Allern, E., Aylott, N., Bardi, L., Costa-Lobo, M., Cross, W. P., Deschouwer, K., Eneydi, Z., Fabre, E., Farrell, D., Gauja, A., Kopeký, P., Koole, R., Verge Mestre, T., Müller, W., Pedersen, K., Rahat, G., … van Haute, E. (2016). Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies. Party Politics, 22(6), 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816662493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemmele, A., & Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (2015). Beyond party members: Changing approaches to partisan mobilization. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J. (2019). What is donald trump? Forms of ‘celebrity’ in celebrity politics. Political Studies Review, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918772995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2016). Party campaigners or citizen campaigners? How social media deepen and broaden party-related engagement. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Dual screening, public service broadcasting, and political participation in eight western democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218779170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I. (2000). On the internal balance of party power: Party organizations in new democracies. Party Politics, 6(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. (2020). Membership and members’ participation in new digital parties: Bring back the people? Comparative European Politics, 18(4), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00201-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Piazza, A., & Soule, S. A. (2018). Boundary-spanning in social movements: Antecedents and outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 167–187. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Corbett, J., & Flinders, M. (2016). Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116632182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar