Colonising the narrative space: unliveable lives, unseeable struggles and the necropolitical governance of digital populations

References

• 7amleh. (2021, May 21). The attacks on Palestinian digital rights: progress report, May 6-19, 2021. 7amleh. https://7amleh.org/2021/05/21/7amleh-issues-report-documenting-the-attacks-on-palestinian-digital-rights
   Google Scholar
• Access Now. (2021, May 18). Making matters worse, social media companies – like FB, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok – are censoring Palestinians as they face military violence […]. https://twitter.com/accessnow/status/1394373884170887175
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S., Baik, J., & Krause, C. S. (2022). Splintering and centralizing platform governance: How Facebook adapted its content moderation practices to the political and legal contexts in the United States, Germany, and South Korea. Information Communication and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2113817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkad, D. (2021, May 19). Palestinian journalists accuse Facebook of censorship. Middle East Eye. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/palestine-israel-facebook-censorship-data-algorithms
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2022, September 29). Myanmar: Facebook’s systems promoted violence against Rohingya; Meta owes reparations. Amnesty International. https://bit.ly/3FwC1TP
   Google Scholar
• Andén-Papadopoulos, K. (2020). The “image-as-forensic-evidence” economy in the post-2011 Syrian conflict: The power and constraints of contemporary practices of video activism. International Journal of Communication, 14(34), 5072–5091.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M., & Volcic, Z. (2020). “Smart” cameras and the operational enclosure. Television & New Media, 22(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419890456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (2004). The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Article 19. (2022, July 19). Response to the consultation of the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression on her report on challenges to freedom of opinion and expression in times of conflicts and disturbances. Article 19. https://www.article19.org/resources/un-submission-free-expression-armed-conflicts/
   Google Scholar
• Asher-schapiro, A. (2017, November 3). YouTube and Facebook are removing evidence of atrocities, jeopardizing cases against war criminals. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2017/11/02/war-crimes-youtube-facebook-syria-rohingya/
   Google Scholar
• Banchik, A. V. (2021). Disappearing acts: Content moderation and emergent practices to preserve at-risk human rights–related content. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1527–1544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargu, B. (2019). Turkey’s necropolitical laboratory: Notes towards an investigation. In B. Bargu (Ed.), Turkey’s necropolitical laboratory: Democracy, violence and resistance (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2007). Slow death (sovereignty, obesity, lateral agency). Critical Inquiry, 33(4), 754–780. https://doi.org/10.1086/521568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. (2021a, October 13). Revealed: Facebook’s secret blacklist of “dangerous individuals and organizations”. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2021/10/12/facebook-secret-blacklist-dangerous/
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. (2021b, May 15). Facebook’s secret rules about the word “Zionist” impede criticism of Israel. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2021/05/14/facebook-israel-zionist-moderation/
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. (2022a, February 25). Facebook allows praise of neo-Nazi Ukrainian battalion if it fights Russian invasion. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2022/02/24/ukraine-facebook-azov-battalion-russia/
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. (2022b, April 14). Facebook’s Ukraine-Russia moderation rules prompt cries of double standard. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2022/04/13/facebook-ukraine-russia-moderation-double-standard/
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, P. (2021, October 19). Which government censors the tech giants the most? Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/tech-giant-censorship/
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2022, July 21). Meta and hate speech in India. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/07/21/meta-and-hate-speech-india
   Google Scholar
• Business for Social Responsibility. (2022, September 22). Human rights due diligence of Meta’s impacts in Israel and Palestine in May 2021. Accessed January 18, 2023, from https://www.bsr.org/en/reports/meta-human-rights-israel-palestine
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, N. (2022a, December 13). Meta launches new content moderation tool as it takes chair of counter-terrorism NGO. Meta. https://about.fb.com/news/2022/12/meta-launches-new-content-moderation-tool/
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, N. (2022b, March 12). There has been a lot of coverage and discussion of how we are applying our policies to speech […]. Twitter. shorturl.at/hjBJ1.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, Á, & Hecht, L. (2021). Double standards in social media content moderation. Brennan Centre For Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/double-standards-social-media-content-moderation
   Google Scholar
• Dijck, J. v., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eghbariah, R., & Metwally, A. (2021). Informal governance: Internet referral units and the rise of state interpretation of terms of service. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 23(Spring), 542–616. https://yjolt.org/sites/default/files/23_yale_j.l._tech._542_informal_governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi-Bicchierai, L. (2021, July 23). Facebook Says ‘death to Khamenei’ posts are ok for the next two weeks. Vice News. https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7exzm/facebook-says-death-to-khamenei-posts-are-ok-for-the-next-two-weeks
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data and Society, 7(2), 205395172094323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2022). Do not recommend? Reduction as a form of content moderation. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 205630512211175. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221117552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Witness. (2022, July 28). Facebook unable to detect hate speech weeks away from tight Kenyan election. Global Witness. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/digital-threats/hate-speech-kenyan-election/
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. (2018a). The failure of internet freedom. Knight First Amendment Institute, 13, 1–17. https://knightcolumbia.org/content/failure-internet-freedom
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. (2018b). Sovereign difference and sovereign deference on the internet. Yale Law Journal Forum, 128(8), 818–826. https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
   Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R. (2019a). What is platform governance? Information Communication and Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R. (2019b). The platform governance triangle: Conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 0–22. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data and Society, 7(1), 205395171989794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. (2023, February 25). New law sought by Brazil’s Lula to ban and punish “fake news and disinformation” threatens the free internet everywhere. Greenwald Locals. https://greenwald.locals.com/post/3585012/new-law-sought-by-brazils-lula-to-ban-and-punish-fake-news-and-disinformation-threatens-the-free
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, F. (2021, October 4). Statement of Frances Haugen. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/services/files/FC8A558E-824E-4914-BEDB-3A7B1190BD49
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2018, February 14). Germany: Flawed Social Media Law. . Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/02/14/germany-flawed-social-media-law
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2022, September 27). Statement Regarding BSR’s HRA for Meta on Palestine & Israel. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/09/27/statement-regarding-bsrs-hra-meta-palestine-israel
   Google Scholar
• Kaltheuner, F. (2022, February 21). If Nick Clegg wants to fix Meta, he needs to tackle its problem with human rights. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/02/21/if-nick-clegg-wants-fix-meta-he-needs-tackle-its-problem-human-rights
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I. (2022, October 17). Disinformation and freedom of opinion and expression during armed conflicts: note by the Secretary-General. Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3987899?ln = en
   Google Scholar
• Klippenstein, K., & Fang, L. (2022, October 31). Truth cops: Leaked documents outline DHS’s plans to police disinformation. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/
   Google Scholar
• Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraidy, M. M. (2016). The naked blogger of Cairo. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraidy, M. M. (2017). The projectilic image: Islamic State’s digital visual warfare and global networked affect. Media, Culture and Society, 39(8), 1194–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717725575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, J. (2021, October 23). Israel outlaws Palestinian rights groups, alleging terrorism. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-israel-terrorism-96464d7d14c3a1a0b5adb75a45aa6a5e
   Google Scholar
• Kunstman, A., & Stein, R. (2015). Digital militarism: Israel's occupation in the social media age. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C., & Millette, M. (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199–214). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983847.n13
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2023, in press). Platform necropolitics: Content moderation and censoring of pro-Palestinian voices on social media. In N. Miladi (Ed.), Global media coverage of the Palestinian Israeli conflict: Reporting the Sheikh Jarrah evictions (pp. 219–235). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mac, R. (2021, May 12). Instagram censored posts about one of Islam’s holiest mosques, drawing employee ire. Buzz Feed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/instagram-facebook-censored-al-aqsa-mosque
   Google Scholar
• Mac, R., Isaac, M., & Frenkel, S. (2022, March 30). How war in Ukraine roiled Facebook and Instagram. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/30/technology/ukraine-russia-facebook-instagram.html
   Google Scholar
• Masters, J. (2023, February 14). Ukraine: Conflict at the crossroads of Europe and Russia. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ukraine-conflict-crossroads-europe-and-russia
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, A. (2022). Advancing digital safety for high-risk communities [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. Deep Blue. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/174419/1/amcdon_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meta. (2021, January–June). Government requests for data: Israel. Transparency Center. Meta. https://transparency.fb.com/data/government-data-requests/country/IL/
   Google Scholar
• Meta. (2023, March 9). Transparency centre: Dangerous individuals and organisations. Meta. https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/policies/community-standards/dangerous-individuals-organizations/
   Google Scholar
• Milmo, D. (2022, March 14). Facebook and Instagram users not allowed to call for death of Putin. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/mar/14/facebook-instagram-death-putin-meta
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The right to look. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/659354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oremus, W. (2022, March 25). Social media wasn't ready for this war. It needs a plan for the next one. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/25/social-media-ukraine-rules-war-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Oversight Board. (2021, September). Shared Al Jazeera post. Oversight Board. https://www.oversightboard.com/decision/FB-P93JPX02
   Google Scholar
• Papaevangelou, C., & Smyrnaios, N. (2022, March 12). The war in Ukraine exposes social media as a tool of the state. Tech Policy Press. https://techpolicy.press/the-war-in-ukraine-exposes-social-media-as-a-tool-of-the-state/
   Google Scholar
• Patel, F., & Dwyer, M. P. (2021, November 4). So, what does Facebook take down ? The secret list of ‘dangerous’ individuals and organizations. Brennan Center For Social Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/so-what-does-facebook-take-down-secret-list-dangerous-individuals-and
   Google Scholar
• Patrikarakos, D. (2017). War in 140 characters: How social media is reshaping conflict in the twenty-first century. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., & Hofmann, J. (2020). Towards platform observability. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1535
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robins-Early, N. (2021, November 9). How Facebook is stoking a civil war in Ethiopia. Vice News. https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjbpd7/how-facebook-is-stoking-a-civil-war-in-ethiopia
   Google Scholar
• Sada Social Center. (2021, June 2). 770 violations during May and the center sues Facebook. Sada Social Center. https://sada.social/?p = 1907
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2021, October 25). Facebook did little to moderate posts in the world’s most violent countries. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/25/facebook-moderate-posts-violent-countries-517050
   Google Scholar
• Shtaya, M. (2022, March 22). Who gets to speak out against their occupier on social media? +972 Magazine. https://www.972mag.com/social-media-ukraine-palestinians-meta/
   Google Scholar
• Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Facebook Papers. (2021, November 24). The Facebook Papers. https://facebookpapers.com/
   Google Scholar
• Törnberg, P. (2023). How platforms govern: Social regulation in digital capitalism. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231153808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynan, C. (2022, April 7). The implications of inconsistent content moderation: Reflections on Ukraine and Yemen conflicts. Global Policy Journal. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/07/04/2022/implications-inconsistent-content-moderation-reflections-ukraine-and-yemen
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of State. (2022, April 17). 2021 country reports on human rights practices: Israel, West Bank and Gaza. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/313615_israel-2021-human-rights-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vengattil, M., & Culliford, E. (2022, March 11). Facebook allows war posts urging violence against Russian invaders. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/exclusive-facebook-instagram-temporarily-allow-calls-violence-against-russians-2022-03-10/
   Google Scholar
• Wadekar, N. (2022). Why dangerous content thrives on Facebook and TikTok in Kenya. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/31/kenya-meta-tiktok-facebook-disinformation/
   Google Scholar
• York, J. (2021). Silicon values: The future of free speech under surveillance capitalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• York, J. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2019). Moderating the public sphere. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the Age of platforms (pp. 137–162). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakrzewski, C., De Vynck, G., Masih, N., & Mahtani, S. (2021, October 24). How Facebook neglected the rest of the world, fueling hate speech and violence in India. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/24/india-facebook-misinformation-hate-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Does social media influence conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716650925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019a). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019b). “We make them dance”: Surveillance capitalism, the rise of instrumentarian power, and the threat to human rights. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 3–51). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar