References
- Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Duke University Press.
- Ananny, M. (2019). Probably speech, maybe free: Toward a Probabilistic understanding of online expression and platform governance. Knight First Amendment Institute. https://knightcolumbia.org/content/probably-speech-maybe-free-toward-a-probabilistic-understanding-of-online-expression-and-platform-governance
- Ananny, M. (2020). Making political people: How social media create the ideals, definitions, and probabilities of political speech. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 4, 351–366. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.2-p351-366-Ananny.pdf
- Badiou, A. (2007). The century. Polity Press.
- Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
- Beer, D. (2023). The tensions of algorithmic thinking: Automation, intelligence and the politics of knowing. Bristol University Press.
- Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
- Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. Penguin Books.
- Brown, W., & Fleming, D. H. (2020). Celebrity headjobs: Or oozing squid sex with a framed-up leaky {Schar-JØ}. Porn Studies, 7(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2020.1815570.
- Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
- Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security. California Law Review, 107, 1755–1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J
- Chun, W. (2008). On ‘sourcery,’ or code as fetish. Configurations, 16(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0064
- Chun, W. H. K. (2021). Discriminating data: Correlation, neighborhoods, and the new politics of recognition. MIT Press.
- Clegg, N. (2019). Facebook, elections and political speech. Meta Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/09/elections-and-political-speech/
- Compton, S. (2021). More women are facing the reality of deepfakes, and they’re ruining lives. Vogue. https://www.vogue.co.uk/news/article/stop-deepfakes-campaign
- Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. MIT Press.
- Crawford, K. (2016). Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915589635
- Daston, L., & Galison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations, 40, 81–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928741
- Deeptrace. (2019). The state of deepfakes: Landscape, threats, and impact. Deeptrace Labs. https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/10/08/deepfake_report.pdf
- Deng, J., Socher, R., Li, L. J., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009). Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848
- Denson, S. (2020). Discorrelated images. Duke University Press.
- Derrida, J., & Stiegler, B. (2002). Echographies of television: Filmed interviews. Polity Press.
- De Vries, K. (2020). You never fake alone: Creative AI in action. Information, Communication & Society, 23(14), 2110–2127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1754877
- Diakopoulos, N., & Johnson, D. (2020). Anticipating and addressing the ethical implications of deepfakes in the context of elections. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925811.
- Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
- Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 1–9.
- Gosse, C., & Burkell, J. (2020). Politics and porn: How news media characterizes problems presented by deepfakes. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 37(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1832697
- Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The netflix prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538646
- Hao, K. (2022). Google has released a tool to spot faked and doctored images. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/05/349126/google-ai-deepfakes-manipulated-images-jigsaw-assembler/
- Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
- Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
- Heemsbergen, L., Trere, E., & Pereira, G. (2022). Introduction to algorithmic antagonisms: Resistance, reconfiguration, and renaissance for computational life. Media International Australia, 183(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221086042
- Jacobsen, B. N. (2021). Regimes of recognition on algorithmic media. New Media & Society, 1–16. Online first. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.117714614448211053555
- Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019). A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. ArXiv, 1-12.
- Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., & Aila, T. (2020). Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN. ArXiv, 1-21.
- Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
- Meikle, G. (2023). Deepfakes. Polity Press.
- Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. The University of Chicago Press.
- Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. Verso.
- Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual and other pleasures. Palgrave.
- Offert, F. (2021). Latent deep space: Generative adversarial networks in the sciences. Media + Environment, 3(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.29905
- Raterink, C. (2021). Assessing the risks of language model ‘deepfakes’ to democracy. Tech Policy Review. https://techpolicy.press/assessing-the-risks-of-language-model-deepfakes-to-democracy/
- Schick, N. (2020). Deepfakes: The coming infocapolypse. Grand Central Publishing.
- Schroepfer, M. (2019). Creating a dataset and a challenge for deepfakes. Meta AI. https://ai.facebook.com/blog/deepfake-detection-challenge?utm_source = hp
- Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392
- Uricchio, W. (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.548486
- Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News. Social Media + Society, (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
- van der Nagel, E. (2020). Verifying images: Deepfakes, control, and consent. Porn Studies, (4), 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2020.1741434.
- Wakefield, J. (2022). Deepfake presidents used in Russia-Ukraine war. BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-60780142
- Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
- Yadlin-Segal, A., & Oppenheim, Y. (2021). Whose dystopia is it anyway? Deepfakes and social media regulation. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 27(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520923963
- Zeilinger, M. (2021). Generative adversarial copy machines. Culture Machine, 20, 1–23. https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Martin-Zeilinger.pdf
- Zylinska, J. (2020). Ai art: Machine visions and warped dreams. Open Humanities Press.