1,903
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Contextual social valences for artificial intelligence: anticipation that matters in social work

ORCID Icon
Pages 1110-1125 | Received 19 Sep 2022, Accepted 14 Jun 2023, Published online: 25 Jul 2023

References

  • Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28(1), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.18
  • Amrit, C., Paauw, T., Aly, R., & Lavric, M. (2017). Identifying child abuse through text mining and machine learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.035
  • Andrejevic, M. (2017). To preempt a thief. International Journal of Communication, 11, 879–896.
  • Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2017). Politics of prediction. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016667623
  • Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2021). Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim code. Polity Press.
  • Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
  • boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  • Cheng, H.-F., Stapleton, L., Kawakami, A., Sivaraman, V., Cheng, Y., & Qing, D. (2022). How child welfare workers reduce racial disparities in algorithmic decisions. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  • Church, C. E., & Fairchild, A. J. (2017). In search of a silver bullet: Child welfare’s embrace of predictive analytics. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 68(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12086
  • Collins, H., & Kusch, M. (1998). The shape of actions: What humans and machines Can Do. MIT Press.
  • Cornell, K. L. (2006). Person-in-situation: History, theory, and new directions for social work practice. Praxis, 6(4), 50–57.
  • Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Foust, R., Vaithianathan, R., & Putnam-Hornstein, E. (2017). Risk assessment and decision making in child protective services: Predictive risk modeling in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.027
  • Devlieghere, J., & Gillingham, P. (2021). Transparency in social work: A critical exploration and reflection. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), 3375–3392. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa166
  • Doueck, H. J., English, D. J., DePanfilis, D., & Moote, G. T. (1993). Decision-making in child protective services: A comparison of selected risk-assessment systems. Child Welfare, 72(5), 441–452.
  • Drake, B., Melissa, J.-R., Gandarilla, O. M., Maria, M., & Darejan, D. (2020). A practical framework for considering the use of predictive risk modeling in child welfare. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220978200
  • Elgin, D. J. (2018). Utilizing predictive modeling to enhance policy and practice through improved identification of at-risk clients: Predicting permanency for foster children. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.030
  • Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Macmillan.
  • Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The rise of Big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of Law enforcement. NY University Press.
  • Fiore-Gartland, B., & Neff, G. (2015). Communication, mediation, and the expectations of data: Data valences across health and wellness communities. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1466–1484.
  • Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2013). Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(8), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.11.002
  • Gillingham, P. (2019). Can predictive algorithms assist decision-making in social work with children and families? Child Abuse Review, 28(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2547
  • Gillingham, P. (2020). The development of algorithmically based decision-making systems in children’s protective services: Is administrative data good enough? The British Journal of Social Work, 50(2), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz157
  • Gillingham, P., & Graham, T. (2017). Big data in social welfare: The development of a critical perspective on social work’s latest “electronic turn”. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1134606
  • Kawakami, A. (2022). Improving human-AI partnerships in child welfare: understanding worker practices, challenges, and desires for algorithmic decision support. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  • Keddell, E. (2015). The ethics of predictive risk modelling in the Aotearoa/New Zealand child welfare context: Child abuse prevention or neo-liberal tool? Critical Social Policy, 35(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018314543224
  • Keddell, E. (2019). Algorithmic justice in child protection: Statistical fairness, social justice and the implications for practice. Social Sciences, 8(10), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100281
  • Liukko, E. (2020). Monialaisesti palveluja tarvitsevien tunnistaminen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Policy Brief, 21/2020, Prime Minister’s Office.
  • Mackenzie, A. (2013). Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 6(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.12
  • Mackenzie, A. (2015). The production of prediction: What does machine learning want? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577384
  • Marjanovic, O., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Vidgen, R. (2021). Algorithmic pollution: Making the invisible visible. Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211010356
  • Markham, A. (2021). The limits of the imaginary: Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms. New Media & Society, 23(2), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929322
  • Montgomery, C. M. (2017). From standardization to adaptation: Clinical trials and the moral economy of anticipation. Science as Culture, 26(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1255721
  • Pääkkönen, J., Laaksonen, S.-M., & Jauho, M. (2020). Credibility by automation: Expectations of future knowledge production in social media analytics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 26(4), 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520901839
  • Pesonen, K., Korpela, J., Vilko, J., & Elfvengren, K. (2023). Realizing the value potential of AI in service needs assessment: Cases in child welfare and mental health services. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2022). Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647
  • Pink, S., Ruckenstein, M., Berg, M., & Lupton, D. (2022). Everyday automation: Setting a research agenda. In S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton, & M. Ruckenstein (Eds.), Everyday automation. Experiencing and anticipating automated decision-making (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
  • Redden, J., Dencik, L., & Warne, H. (2020). Datafied child welfare services: Unpacking politics, economics and power. Policy Studies, 41(5), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1724928
  • Ruckenstein, M. (2022). Time to re-humanize algorithmic systems. AI & Society.
  • Saxena, D., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Wisniewski, P., & Guha, S. (2021). A framework of high-stakes algorithmic decision-making for the public sector developed through a case study of child-welfare. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476089
  • Stapleton, L., Lee, M. H., Qing, D., Wright, M., Chouldechova, A., Holstein, K., Wu, Z. S., & Zhu, H. (2022). Imagining new futures beyond predictive systems in child welfare: A qualitative study with impacted stakeholders. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
  • Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-Machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tutton, R. (2011). Promising pessimism: Reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710397398
  • Tutton, R. (2021). Sociotechnical imaginaries and techno-optimism: Examining outer space utopias of silicon valley. Science as Culture, 30(3), 416–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2020.1841151
  • Vaithianathan, R., Maloney, T., Putnam-Hornstein, E., & Jiang, N. (2013). Children in the public benefit system at risk of maltreatment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(3), 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.022
  • Wise, J. M. (1998). Intelligent agency. Cultural Studies, 12(3), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/095023898335483