‘Do your own research': affordance activation and disinformation spread

References

• Adams, D. M., & Pilloud, M. A. (2021). Perceptions of race and ancestry in teaching, research, and public engagement in biological anthropology. Human Biology, 93(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.93.1.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life (D. Couling, Trans.). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (2021). Fake news is not a virus: On platforms and their effects. Communication Theory, 31(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Farris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (0 ed., pp. 47–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Connors, P., Ortega, T., Kerr, D., & Wineburg, S. (2021). Lateral reading: College students learn to critically evaluate internet sources in an online course. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, J. E., Brooks, P. J., Scimeca, D., Todorova, R., Galati, P., Batson, M., Grosso, R., Matthews, M., Miller, V., & Caulfield, M. (2021). Improving college students’ fact-checking strategies through lateral reading instruction in a general education civics course. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Canizales, S. L., & Vallejo, J. A. (2021). Latinos & racism in the Trump era. Daedalus, 150(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01852
   Google Scholar
• Cantril, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars; a study in the psychology of panic. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Chang, H., Rao, A., Lerman, K., Cowan, G., & Ferrara, E. (2021). COVID-19 misinformation and the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, K., & Isaac, M. (2021, January 8). Twitter permanently bans Trump, capping online revolt. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2009). Cloaked websites: Propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media & Society, 11(5), 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the “alt-right”. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766547
   Google Scholar
• Delkic, M. (2022, May 10). Trump’s banishment from Facebook and Twitter: A timeline. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, A. R. (2022). Conspiracy theories and the manufacture of dissent: QAnon, the ‘big lie’, COVID-19, and the rise of rightwing propaganda. Critical Sociology, 48(6), 1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211073669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (1st ed., pp. 203–227). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. C. (2020). From the margins to the center: Legitimation strategies from an alt-right case study. Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Reaching Through Technology - CHI ‘91, 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, B. (2019, September 28). A US soldier working at Mar-a-Lago uploaded photos of an underage girl to a Russian website—a closer look at the site reveals a horrific underworld. Business Insider.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Golebiewski, M., & boyd, D. (2019). Data voids: Where missing data can easily be exploited. Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Google and Censorship through Search Engines. (2019). Hearing before the senate committee on the judiciary, subcommittee on the constitution, 116th congress.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J., & Liedke, J. (2022). U.S. adults under 30 now trust information from social media almost as much as from national news outlets. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/10/27/u-s-adults-under-30-now-trust-information-from-social-media-almost-as-much-as-from-national-news-outlets/
   Google Scholar
• Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2019). Invisible search and online search engines: The ubiquity of search in everyday life (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. (2017). Making sense of the alt-right (p. 232). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmer, N. (2016). Messengers of the right: Conservative media and the transformation of American politics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, C. (2017). Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information (p. 22). Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., & Vetter, M. A. (2020). The good, the bot, and the ugly: Problematic information and critical media literacy in the post digital era. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00069-4
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500200169
   Google Scholar
• Kirdemir, B., Agarwal, N., & Chair, M.-E. (2020). Social media, news, polarization, and disinformation in times of crisis: A case study on Turkey. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. (2007). The anti-immigration movement: From shovels to suits. NACLA Report on the Americas, 40(3), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2007.11722307
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Yang, T., Inchoco, G. D., Jones, G. M., & Satyanarayan, A. (2021). Viral visualizations: How coronavirus skeptics use orthodox data practices to promote unorthodox science online. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (2018). Alternative influence: Broadcasting the reactionary right on YouTube (p. 61). Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (2010). Salsa dancing into the social sciences: Research in an age of info-glut. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. N. (2017). Ctrl-Alt-Delete: An antifascist report on the alternative right. In K. Kersplebedeb (Ed.), Ctrl-Alt-Delete: An antifascist report on the alternative right. Kersplebedeb Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, A. (2022, March 15). The DuckDuckGo users furious at its response to the war in Ukraine. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2022/03/duckduckgo-russian-disinformation-downranking.html
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online (p. 106). Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474–512.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Partin, W. C. (2022). Constructing alternative facts: Populist expertise and the QAnon conspiracy. New Media & Society, 14614448221090200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. E., Krutka, D., & Stoddard, J. (2018). Media literacy, democracy, and the challenge of fake news. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-2-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrew, S., Smith, M., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2019). Improving university students’ web savvy: An intervention study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M. (2021). Introduction: “Citation networks as antidiscriminatory practice”. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 7(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v7i2.37645
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511560338. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Mortenson, C., & Li, Q. (2021). The presumed influence of election misinformation on others reduces our own satisfaction with democracy. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2014). The design of everyday things, revised and expanded edition. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposureis linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orwell, G. (2021). Nineteen eighty–four. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1949).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., & Milner, R. (2021). You are here: A field guide for navigating poliarized speech, conspiracy theories, and our polluted media landscape. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• PRRI Staff. (2022). The persistence of QAnon in the post-Trump era: An analysis of who believes the conspiracies (p. 14). Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI).
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., Keeter, S., & Perrin, A. (2022). Trust and distrust in America. Pew Research Center. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, A. (2019). Superior: The return of race science. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. (2009). `How many cases do I need?'. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., Arif, A., & Wilson, T. (2019). Disinformation as collaborative work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starbird, K., DiResta, R., & DeButts, M. (2023). Influence and Improvisation: Participatory Disinformation during the 2020 US Election. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 205630512311779. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stifling Free Speech: Technological Censorship and the Public Discourse. (2019). Hearing before the committee on the judiciary, subcommittee on the constitution, 116th congress. committee on the judiciary, subcommittee on the constitution.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, M. (2013). “But I didn't mean it!” Why it's so hard to prioritize impacts over intents. Scientific American – Psychological Science in the Public Interest.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A. (2022, February 23). Fed up with Google, conspiracy theorists turn to DuckDuckGo. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Tripodi, F. (2018). Searching for alternative facts: Analyzing scriptural inference in conservative news practices. Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tripodi, F., & Ma, Y. (2022). You’ve got mail: How the Trump administration used legislative communication to frame his last year in office. Information, Communication & Society, 25(5), 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2020873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripodi, F. B. (2021). ReOpen demands as public health threat: A sociotechnical framework for understanding the stickiness of misinformation. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 28(4), 321–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripodi, F. B. (2022). The propagandists’ playbook: How conservative elites manipulate search and threaten democracy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufecki, Z. (2018). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uyheng, J., Bellutta, D., & Carley, K. M. (2022). Bots amplify and redirect hate speech in online discourse about racism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 205630512211047. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221104749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2019, July 28). Why conservatives allege big tech is muzzling them. The Atlantic.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M. D., & Ortega, T. (2022). Lateral reading on the open internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, L., Roscher, F., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). Your friendly neighborhood troll: The internet research agency’s use of local and fake news in the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign [Data Report]. NYU Center for Social Media and Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (Fifth edition.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zade, H., Wack, M., Zhang, Y., Starbird, K., Calo, R., Young, J., & West, J. D. (2022). Auditing google’s search headlines as a potential gateway to misleading content: Evidence from the 2020 US election. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i4.72
   Google Scholar
• Zaru, D. (2021, January 13). Trump Twitter ban raises concerns over “unchecked” power of big tech. ABC News.
   Google Scholar