References

• Åberg, J.-O. (1997). Det rationella och det legitima. En studie av utvärderingars teori och praktik [The rational and the legitimate. A study of the theory and practice of evaluations]. Göteborg: Göteborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Alkin, M. C. (Ed.). (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G., Thelander, J., & Åkerström, M. (2009). Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella? En processutvärdering av projektet ‘Motverka våld och gäng’ [Chain of care for young people or professionals? A process evaluation of the program ‘Obstruct violence and gangs’]. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2009). The political uses of expert knowledge: Immigration policy and social research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (1997). Thoughts for a new evaluation society. Evaluation, 3(1), 97–109. doi:10.1177/135638909700300107
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (2006). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 33–55). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T., Donaldson, S. I., & Mark, M. M. (2011). Validity frameworks for outcome evaluation. In H. T. Chen, S. I. Donaldson, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Advancing validity in outcome evaluation: Theory and practice. New directions for evaluation (pp. 5–16). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). The evaluation society. Stanford, CA: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P., & Krogstrup, H. K. (2000). Evaluering og institutionelle standarder: nyinstitutionelle betragtninger af evaluering som vor tids ritual [Evaluation and institutional standards: Neo-institutional reflections on evaluation as contemporary ritual]. Politica, 32(3), 283–299. Retrieved from http://www.tidsskrift.dk/index.php/politica/article/view/9151/17300
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P., & Larsen, F. (2001). Anvendelse af evaluering – Historien om et begreb, der udvider sig [Use of evaluation – The history of a expanding concept]. In P. Dahler-Larsen, & H. K. Krogstrup (Eds.), Tendenser i evaluering [Trends in evaluation], (pp. 211–220). Odense, Denmark: Odense Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fäldt, J., Storbjörk, J., Palm, J., Oscarsson, L., & Stenius, K. (2007). Vårdkedjeprojektet. Tre utvärderingsperspektiv. Forskningsrapport, no. 2 [The chain of care program. Three evaluation perspectives. Research report no 2]. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A., Ghazinour, M., & Mårald, G. (2008). Regeringens insatser mot hedersrelaterat våld 2003–2007 – slutrapport från den nationella utvärderingen [Final evaluation report of the Swedish HRV-programme]. Evaluation Reports, no. 25. Umeå: Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson, B., & Månsson, S.-A. (1996). Deltagande observation [Participant observation]. In P.-G. Svensson & B. Starrin (Eds.), Kvalitativa studier i teori och praktik [Qualitative studies in theory and practice] (pp. 11–51). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• IMS. (2009). Personalutbildning i äldreomsorg: blir den till nytta för de äldre? En utvärdering av Kompetensstegen [Staff education within care of older people: Does it benefit the elderly? An evaluation of the Competence ladder]. Stockholm: Institutet för metodutveckling i socialt arbete, Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. A. (2004). Tikkun olam. The roots of participatory evaluation. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 331–342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, L. (2008). Utvärderingsmonstret [The evaluation monster]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J., & Rothstein, B. (2006). Sweden: The fall of the strong state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basics of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, M. M., Greene, J. C., & Shaw, I. F. (2007). The evaluation of policies, programs, and practices. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 1–30). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morago, P. (2006). Evidence-based practice: From medicine to social work. European Journal of Social Work, 9(4), 461–477. doi:10.1080/13691450600958510
   Google Scholar
• Månsson, S.-A. (2000). Kunskapsutveckling inom socialtjänsten och den akademiska forskningen: drar vi åt samma håll? [Knowledge development in social services and academic research: Are we going in the same direction?] Socionomen, 8, 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Månsson, S.-A. (2001). Nationellt stöd för kunskapsutveckling inom socialtjänsten [National support for knowledge development in social services]. Socionomen, 3, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare [online]. Retrieved from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence. How research can inform practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, L. (2009). Evidensbaserad praktik inom socialtjänsten [Evidence-based practice in social services: An introduction for practitioners, managers, politicians and students]. Stockholm: SKL Kommentus.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. C. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabo, A. (2003). Utvärdering som moderna ritualer [Evaluations as modern rituals: An anthropological perspective]. In B. Rombach & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Från sanningssökande till styrmedel [From a search for truth to a governing instrument. Modern evaluations in public sectors] (pp. 171–191). Stockholm: Santérus.
   Google Scholar
• Rieper, O., & Foss Hansen, H. (2007). Metodedebatten om evidens [The Methodological debate about evidence] [online]. Retrieved from http://www.akf.dk/udgivelser/2007/pdf/metodedebat_evidens.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B., & Faugert, S. (2007). Perspektiv på utvärdering [Perspectives on evaluation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (2004). Utilizing evaluation evidence to enhance professional practice. Evaluation, 10(4), 410–429. doi:10.1177/1356389004050284
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (2009). Vårdöverenskommelsen: stimulansmedel till bättre vård och behandling av personer med tungt missbruk [The care agreement: State subsidies for improved care and treatment of people with serious substance abuse]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Statskontoret. (2007). Verksamhetsanknutna statsbidrag till kommuner och landsting [Specific purpose grants to local governments and county councils]. Rapport. 2007:17. Stockholm: Statskontoret. Retrieved from http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/2007/200717.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundell, K. (2008). Effektutvärderingar [Effect evaluations]. In U. Jergeby (Ed.), Evidensbaserad praktik i socialt arbete [Evidence-based practice in social work] (pp. 47–87). Stockholm: Gothia.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2004). Utvärderingsböljans former och drivkrafter [The evaluation wave's shapes and driving forces] [online]. Gävle: Uppsala University. Retrieved from http://www.svuf.nu/konferensen2004/papers/k3_evert_vedung.pdf. (in Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2010). Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation, 16(3), 263–277. doi:10.1177/1356389010372452
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2011). Spridning, användning och implementering av utvärdering [Diffusion, utilization and implementation of evaluation]. In B. Blom, S. Morén, & L. Nygren (Eds.), Utvärdering i socialt arbete [Evaluation in social work] (pp. 285–299). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?Evaluation Practice, 9(1), 5–19. doi:10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80017-5
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (2004). Rooting for evaluation: A cliff notes version of my work. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 153–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12–30. doi:10.1177/1098214004273337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar