References

• Albaeck, A. (1998). Knowledge, interests and the many meanings of evaluation: A developmental perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 7, 94–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1998.tb00208.x
   Google Scholar
• Allegri, E. (2000). Valutazione della qualità e supervisione [ Quality evaluation and supervision]. Trieste: Lint.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2006). Ethics and values in social work (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bellinger, A., & Elliott, T. (2011). What are you looking at ? The potential of appreciative inquiry as a research approach for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 708–725. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertotti, T. (2015). Resources reduction and welfare changes: Tensions between social workers and organisations. The Italian case in child protection services. European Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1030363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezzi, C. (2001). Il nuovo disegno della ricerca valutativa [ The new design of the evaluative research]. Rome: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, L., Bricocoli, M., & Monteleone, R. (2008). Activation and local welfare in Italy: Trends and issues. Social Policy & Administration, 42, 143–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanini, A. (2006). La valutazione nel servizio sociale [Evaluation in social work]. In A. Campanini (Ed.), la valutazione nel servizio sociale (pp. 19–38). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Campanini, A. (2007). Country perspectives. European Journal of Social Work, 10, 107–116. doi:10.1080/13691450601143773
   Google Scholar
• Campanini, A., & Facchini, C. (2013). Social workers affecting social policy in Italy. In J. Gal & I. Weiss (Eds.), Social works affecting social policy: An international perspective on policy practice (pp. 79–99). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campanini, A., & Fortunato, V. (2008). The role of professional social work in the light of the Italian reform. In V. Fortunato, G. J. Friesenhahan, & E. Kantowicz (Eds.), Social work in restructured European welfare states (pp. 27–39). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• College of Social Work. (2012). Professional capabilities framework. London: CSW. Retrieved October 2015, from http://www.beds.ac.uk / https://www.basw.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 5–23. doi:10.1002/ev.1114
   Google Scholar
• De Ambrogio, U., & Civenti, G. (2007). Attenzioni metodologiche e passaggi chiave nella valutazione professionale [Methodological attention and key steps in professional evaluation]. In U. De Ambrogio, T. Bertotti, & F. Merlini (Eds.), L'assistente sociale e la valutazione (pp. 89–107). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• De Ambrogio, U., Bertotti, T., & Merlini, F. (Eds.). (2007). L'assistente sociale e la valutazione [ The social worker and the evaluation]. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• England, H. (1986). Social work as art. Making sense for good practice? London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2008). Reflections on social work's identity: International themes in Italian practitioners’ representation of social work. International Social Work, 51, 206–219. doi:10.1177/0020872807085859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2013). Il Metodo del servizio Sociale [ The method of social work]. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Fazzi, L. (2012). Social work in the public and non profit sector in Italy: What are the differences? European Journal of social work, 15, 629–644. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2011.557180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, E., Höjer, S., & Campanini, A. (2013). Readiness for practice: Social work students’ perspectives in England, Italy, and Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 16, 327–343. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.716397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, L. (2013). Trifocalità [Trifocality]. In A. Campanini (Ed.), Il Nuovo dizionario di Servizio Sociale [ The new dictionary of social work] (pp. 731–735). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Laragy, C., Bland, R., Giles, R., & Scott, V. (2012). Australian practice standards nine years on: Are they useful? International Social Work, 56, 644–658. doi:10.1177/0020872812436623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Brawley, E., & Zorita, P. (2007). Tacit and codified knowledge in social work: A critique of standardization in education and practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88, 534–542. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.3675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlini, F., & Ranci Ortigosa, E. (2003). La valutazione dell'intervento professionale dell'assistente sociale. Un percorso di ricerca e di sperimentazione [Evaluation of social worker's professional intervention. A research]. In U. De Ambrogio (Ed.), Valutare gli interventi e le politiche sociali [ Evaluating interventions and social policies] (pp. 95–115). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., & Lorenz, W. (2010). Beyond the pro and contra of evidence-based practice. Social Work & Society, 8. Retrieved August 2015, from http://www.socwork.net/2010/1/nothdurftter-lorenz
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, M. (2013). La valutazione nei servizi [Evaluation in social services]. In A. Campanini (Ed.), Il Nuovo dizionario di Servizio Sociale (pp. 760–764). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. C. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pawson.
   Google Scholar
• Petersén, A. C., & Olsson, J. I. (2014). An evaluation paradox in social work? An empirical study of evaluation use in connection with temporary programmes in Swedish social work. European Journal of Social Work, 17, 175–191. doi:10.1080/13691457.2013.802226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, H. (1998). Internal and external evaluation of social work. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 7, 137–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1998.tb00215.x
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. J. (2001). The role of science in social work: The perennial debate. Journal of Social Work, 1, 273–293. doi: 10.1177/146801730100100303
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, A. (2003). Evidence-based social work practice: Challenges and promises. Social Work Research, 27, 197–208. doi: 10.1093/swr/27.4.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Lishman, J. (1999). Evaluation and social work practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997). Keeping social work honest: Evaluating as profession and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 27, 847–869. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997/2012). Game plans, buzzes and sheer luck: Doing well in social work. Social Work Research, 21, 69–79. Reprinted in Shaw, I. (2012), Practice and research. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 321–341. doi: 10.1093/swr/21.2.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicora, A. (2006). Riflessività e autovalutazione nel servizio sociale [Riflexivity and self evaluation in social work]. In A. Campanini (Ed.), La valutazione nel servizio sociale [ Evaluation in social work] (pp. 59–75). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1212–1237. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeira, A., Canali, C., Vecchiato, T., Jergeby, U., Thoburn, J., & Neve, E. (2008). Evidence-based social work practice with children and families: A cross national perspective. European Journal of Social Work, 11, 57–72. doi:10.1080/13691450701532107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeira, A., & Rosen, A. (2000). Unraveling ‘tacit knowledge’: What social workers do and why they do it. Social Service Review, 74, 103–123. doi:10.1086/514459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar